Re: MSG Tickets -Who's Got Tickets, Who's Going???
Date: June 15, 2005 01:04
bv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Excuse me, but sec 63 row M must be one of the
> best seats in the entire house. One of the seats I
> just love if I can get my hands on them. You are
> on the edge of the stage, 13 rows up from Lisa,
> Blonde and Bernard. You are elevated slightly so
> that you see everything even if you are not 6 feet
> tall, your view is great. I would much rather sit
> 20 feet from the stage on the side and see
> perfectly than 20 feet back on the floor behind a
> tall guy and see less. It is a mystery why MSG
> call this partly obstructed. The Stones do always
> have open stage design. Open on both sides. The No
> Security arena stage was perfect. Open 360
> degrees. Even the LICKS arena stage was great from
> the sides. I can't imagine they bring up anything
> on the sides that might block the view. This must
> be general MSG terms on sales so that you won't
> bring a bunch of lawyers in case Garth Brooks play
> MSG with a small stage closed on the sides I
> think.
>
> As for MSG prices in general, I think this have
> been said before, but I just have to repeat it.
> Most seats are great. MSG has got an open, wide
> and low design, where you can see great from any
> seat. I have been to MSG 6 times for Stones shows
> and many times for ice hockey. Wherever you sit
> you even see the puck. It is smaller than Mick for
> sure. It is not like some of the arenas where you
> sit high up, and you can't tell the difference
> between players at hockey games.
>
> Bjornulf
I've been in MSG, Bjornulf (I met you after the 2002 show). I know its a good arena to watch a show (well, as far as 20,000 seater arenas go, that is). I had a side view pretty close to the stage and on the lower tier and it was very good.
But regardless of what row it is, this is still a $450 ticket for a seat with an obstructed view! Hardly therefore the best seat in the house.