For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
actually it's not so sad, rather just logical. maybe after watching the "Happy" rendition from Fort Worth'78 Mick himself came to the conclusion that he was hogging the mic way too much to call itQuote
Brstonesfan
it's very sad how this came about on the 81 tour...per contract from rumors we have heard.
what he saidQuote
RollingFreak
Another reason was I assumed he just never felt comfortable in the backup singer role. He can obviously do it, but he's still up there being "Mick Jagger". I feel he thinks if he's up there, he's got to keep the crowd entertained and just figured if its not his song then its just a waste of his energy.
Quote
Brstonesfan
it's very sad how this came about on the 81 tour...per contract from rumors we have heard.
have to agree it doesn't sound like something Keef would likely do.Quote
From4tilLate
In that same article he wrote that in 1981 Keith "hijacked the cherry picker, rose up and played a 17-minute guitar solo" (never happened)
Quote
Nikkeihave to agree it doesn't sound like something Keef would likely do.Quote
From4tilLate
In that same article he wrote that in 1981 Keith "hijacked the cherry picker, rose up and played a 17-minute guitar solo" (never happened)
he'd probably hijack a cherry picker given the chance, but i can't
imagine him playing solo for 17 minutes. on which song even?
did they do that one live? it would've been hilariousQuote
treaclefingers
Hang (from the Cherry Picker) Fire.
Quote
Nikkeihave to agree it doesn't sound like something Keef would likely do.Quote
From4tilLate
In that same article he wrote that in 1981 Keith "hijacked the cherry picker, rose up and played a 17-minute guitar solo" (never happened)
he'd probably hijack a cherry picker given the chance, but i can't
imagine him playing solo for 17 minutes. on which song even?
Quote
Nikkeidid they do that one live? it would've been hilariousQuote
treaclefingers
Hang (from the Cherry Picker) Fire.
would it have been Mick stuck up on that thing for 17min
and Keef refusing to stop the song. that, i can imagine
...someone told me that isn't necessary anymore, since Jagger recently hadQuote
georgeV
someone told me they hook him up to an intravenous.
it's good to hear that responsibilities get shared concerning signature parts of the show.Quote
john lomax
He has a cup of tea and discusses opening riffs with The Scarf.
down in the mix, i presumeQuote
More Hot Rocks
I actually wanna know where Keith goes during some songs.
Quote
latebloomer
He changes his socks.
Quote
Midnight Toker
He finds a good set of ear plugs, inserts them before Keith
starts "Wanna Hold You" and relaxes for 4 minutes.
Quote
BeforeTheyMakeMeRun
I know that during the 1981 tour Mick & Keith weren't exactly good friends, so (forgive me if I'm wrong) there was a clause in the tour contract that Mick Jagger had to leave the stage during Keith's set. When I watched the 1975 tour video of 'Happy' from L.A. Friday (video below), I could see why! Mick was just living up the role of...backing singer(?) as a drug-fueled Richards fumbled through his guitar-plucking and singing, while Jagger just ran around stage dancing before running back to the mic just in time for the chorus, and seemed to try and make Keef's song his (see 1:12).
So this had me wondering-has this tour requirement been implemented in the 1981-2014 tours? I can understand why if Mick needs a wardrobe change in between Keith's last song and Mick's next song, but it seems that since 2013, 'Rambler' has usually, if not always, followed the last Richards performance, and in 2007, 'Miss You' followed Keith's set, with one exception. Does Richards still want Mick off of the stage for his two songs and state it in the contract, or does Jagger leave the stage of his own freewill?