For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
talkcheap
Once again, when I listen to a Stones track and like the bass, i find out it's not Bill playing. This time it was "Some girls" and Keith is playing. Last week it was "Fingerprint file" and Mick Taylor playing bass. Other times it's been Ronnie.
I this Stones secret weapon and there the true Stones groove come from?
Is there anyone else who found out this?
Quote
StonesTodQuote
talkcheap
Once again, when I listen to a Stones track and like the bass, i find out it's not Bill playing. This time it was "Some girls" and Keith is playing. Last week it was "Fingerprint file" and Mick Taylor playing bass. Other times it's been Ronnie.
I this Stones secret weapon and there the true Stones groove come from?
Is there anyone else who found out this?
you forgot about charlie...his bass drum playing is a secret weapon, too.
Quote
talkcheap
I listened to the live dvd "Some girls, live in Texas" from 78 the other day. Bill plays great bass the whole show and he is not mixed down. You hear him loud and well. Great playing.
Quote
DoomandGloom
Hardly anyone listens to Darryl Jones and thinks, Oh Yeah, that's much better.
Wow a mono mix, does it have different elements? I'm shocked to hear there are alternate commercial mixes for Exile. Yep Wood is a good bassist but he refused to move over when Wyman split.Quote
scottkeef
I've always loved Ronnie's sloppy, loopy bass styling that I first heard on the Jeff Beck "Truth"LP but recently I got a MONO promo 45 version of HAPPY and the Keith bass is VERY upfront..I actually never really heard it the way I do on this mix!
I really want the entire album of mono mixes.. Are the vocals louder on TD? There must be some slightly different edits and vocal ad libs.Quote
scottkeef
Yeah, it was kinda a surprise for me too..I had the MONO Tumbling Dice 45 (which just smokes in a way the LP cant do) and I had heard the All Down The Line MONO 45 but not this one...
Quote
Naturalust
Bill's bass playing has really surprised me every time I have taken the time to analyze it in a song. Never really liked his look or attitude much but as a bass player he is damn good, imho. peace
Quote
DoomandGloomI really want the entire album of mono mixes.. Are the vocals louder on TD? There must be some slightly different edits and vocal ad libs.Quote
scottkeef
Yeah, it was kinda a surprise for me too..I had the MONO Tumbling Dice 45 (which just smokes in a way the LP cant do) and I had heard the All Down The Line MONO 45 but not this one...
Quote
talkcheap
Why did they do them in mono? In 1972?
Quote
GravityBoyQuote
talkcheap
Why did they do them in mono? In 1972?
I've recorded my own stuff down the years and sometimes mono is better.
I rarely have a massive left/right channel seperation.
The Beatles albums are better in mono.
Quote
StonesTodQuote
GravityBoyQuote
talkcheap
Why did they do them in mono? In 1972?
I've recorded my own stuff down the years and sometimes mono is better.
I rarely have a massive left/right channel seperation.
The Beatles albums are better in mono.
even better than the google-phonic versions?
Quote
duke richardson
at least Keith and Ronnie play real basses ..not those funny home-made things..
Quote
duke richardson
at least Keith and Ronnie play real basses ..not those funny home-made things..
Quote
GravityBoy
The Beatles albums are better in mono.
So "ALL Down.. " is mono on Exile? Wow!!!!Quote
LieBQuote
GravityBoy
The Beatles albums are better in mono.
That's mostly because the mono versions were considered the "main" or "default" mixes before stereo became standard around '68. They put all their effort into making the mono Revolver and mono Sgt Pepper sounding great, and then had an engineer (more or less) quickly dish out the stereo version with less attention to detail. In later years, the stereo mixes became the common ones, which made the superior mono versions more sought after.
In the Stones case, the situation was a little different, because during the Andrew Oldham years, their production wasn't as good as that of the Beatles/George Martin. In 1967 their songs were so messy that mono/stereo hardly mattered (yeah, I know that's a stretch), and by '68, with Jimmy Miller's fantastic production, mono wasn't interesting anymore.
However, I recently listened to the mono version of Satanic, and to my ears it's clearly superior to the stereo version. More punch and focus. The same can not be said about the mono Banquet, IMHO.
Apart from AM radio purposes (as scottkeef explained), the Stones sometimes went for mono for a punchier mix, as with the well-known All Down The Line version, being mono on the otherwise completely stereo mixed Exile album.
Sorry about the OT...