For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
Max'sKansasCity
I have always liked Zep just fine, and greatly respect the way they ended it with respect to John.... but this resurgence of Zep due to the recent release and the Honors thing will taper off, and then it will be just the Stones... as it always has been. It is silly to try to debate which is a better band, they are both are great... but The Stones.... are THE STONES!!!
why do you think it will "taper off" and be just the stones as its "always been"? here in the states zeppelin has outsold the stones pretty badly over the last 25 years without even touring and only putting out a BBC sessions, 2 live albums and 3 greatest hits
I read something to the tune of Zep has sold 20 million albums since 1990. Something whack like that. No other band has done anything like that. The only band that has come close to touching Led Zeppelin's popularity in the United States is Journey. Of course, simply in the context of classic rock FM radio, which tends to be a driving force behind some band's on tour. There are about 30 some Zep songs played on the radio. Journey has maybe 5 that are played EVERY DAY, sometimes every hour. Pink Floyd about 10, the Stones about 5, the Beatles about 20. That's programming, of course, but it's also demand.
led zeppelin has sold way more than 20 million since 1990. metallica has sold over 30 million albums since 1990 in the states
Quote
Max'sKansasCityQuote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
Max'sKansasCityYou should probably give links to the things you are stating as facts.Quote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
Max'sKansasCity
I have always liked Zep just fine, and greatly respect the way they ended it with respect to John.... but this resurgence of Zep due to the recent release and the Honors thing will taper off, and then it will be just the Stones... as it always has been. It is silly to try to debate which is a better band, they are both are great... but The Stones.... are THE STONES!!!
why do you think it will "taper off" and be just the stones as its "always been"? here in the states zeppelin has outsold the stones pretty badly over the last 25 years without even touring and only putting out a BBC sessions, 2 live albums and 3 greatest hits
I read something to the tune of Zep has sold 20 million albums since 1990. Something whack like that. No other band has done anything like that. The only band that has come close to touching Led Zeppelin's popularity in the United States is Journey. Of course, simply in the context of classic rock FM radio, which tends to be a driving force behind some band's on tour. There are about 30 some Zep songs played on the radio. Journey has maybe 5 that are played EVERY DAY, sometimes every hour. Pink Floyd about 10, the Stones about 5, the Beatles about 20. That's programming, of course, but it's also demand.
led zeppelin has sold way more than 20 million since 1990. metallica has sold over 30 million albums since 1990 in the states
links from me of the person saying journey was the 2nd most popular band in the states since 1990?
things like how many times a song/group is played on the radio per day, how many albums sold, stuff like that.
Quote
MKjanQuote
keefriffhard4life
link to RIAA you can search anything related to certified album sales:
[riaa.com]
led zeppelin 111.5 million
rolling stones- 66.5 million
do a search on led zeppelin and you will see in 1990 the totals for the studio stuff was not very high. example in 1990 physical graffitti was 4 million sold and now it is 16 million sold. another example IV is certified 10 million in 1990 and in 2006 was 23 million so it moved 13 million units in 16 years. just those 2 albums gives zeppelin a sales total 25 million since 1990.
if you want i could give you the sales total of every zeppelin album from 1990-2012 and you can see even if every stones album ever released sold 1 million albums from 1990-2012 its still not enough to pass zeppelins sales in that same timeframe
I'd like to see the amounts for royalties Zep owes to all they ripped off. This would include mechanicals, synch licenses, and performing rights income. If the mechanical licenses were agreed at the statutory rate and not a flat fee, Zep owes
the farm.
Quote
FrankMQuote
LastStopThisTown
2007 Led Zep vs 2007 Stones - Led Zep level of performance, musically speaking, was far better than the Stones. IMO, of course.
It's easy to do one show and put a lot of energy into it. It's much harder to tour from the end of 2005 to 2007 and still have a lot of energy at the end of the tour.
Quote
lem motlow
jimi hendrix- total albums sales to date-22.5 million
bon jovi- total album sales to date-34 million
record sales are a really poor indicator of quality.you may as well be trying to tell me mcdonalds produce better meals than gordon ramsays steakhouse because they sell more food.
Quote
GasLightStreet
Plant fully admitted to nicking Willie Dixon ...
Quote
Claire_MQuote
GasLightStreet
Plant fully admitted to nicking Willie Dixon ...
Robert's joke at the O2 was [[i]paraphrase[/i]] "and I don't know who he nicked it from." Oh how we laughed. It's a valid point though - all music comes from other music.
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
MKjanQuote
keefriffhard4life
link to RIAA you can search anything related to certified album sales:
[riaa.com]
led zeppelin 111.5 million
rolling stones- 66.5 million
do a search on led zeppelin and you will see in 1990 the totals for the studio stuff was not very high. example in 1990 physical graffitti was 4 million sold and now it is 16 million sold. another example IV is certified 10 million in 1990 and in 2006 was 23 million so it moved 13 million units in 16 years. just those 2 albums gives zeppelin a sales total 25 million since 1990.
if you want i could give you the sales total of every zeppelin album from 1990-2012 and you can see even if every stones album ever released sold 1 million albums from 1990-2012 its still not enough to pass zeppelins sales in that same timeframe
I'd like to see the amounts for royalties Zep owes to all they ripped off. This would include mechanicals, synch licenses, and performing rights income. If the mechanical licenses were agreed at the statutory rate and not a flat fee, Zep owes
the farm.
Plant fully admitted to nicking Willie Dixon and that it's paid off. Which would make one think that they've paid all for what they nicked. They certainly could afford to since they sold so many copies.
Quote
MKjanQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
MKjanQuote
keefriffhard4life
link to RIAA you can search anything related to certified album sales:
[riaa.com]
led zeppelin 111.5 million
rolling stones- 66.5 million
do a search on led zeppelin and you will see in 1990 the totals for the studio stuff was not very high. example in 1990 physical graffitti was 4 million sold and now it is 16 million sold. another example IV is certified 10 million in 1990 and in 2006 was 23 million so it moved 13 million units in 16 years. just those 2 albums gives zeppelin a sales total 25 million since 1990.
if you want i could give you the sales total of every zeppelin album from 1990-2012 and you can see even if every stones album ever released sold 1 million albums from 1990-2012 its still not enough to pass zeppelins sales in that same timeframe
I'd like to see the amounts for royalties Zep owes to all they ripped off. This would include mechanicals, synch licenses, and performing rights income. If the mechanical licenses were agreed at the statutory rate and not a flat fee, Zep owes
the farm.
Plant fully admitted to nicking Willie Dixon and that it's paid off. Which would make one think that they've paid all for what they nicked. They certainly could afford to since they sold so many copies.
Hmmm, not so sure if one song paid means other writers/publishers were. Did Plant mention Dixon was paid because they were sued by Dixon?
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
MKjanQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
MKjanQuote
keefriffhard4life
link to RIAA you can search anything related to certified album sales:
[riaa.com]
led zeppelin 111.5 million
rolling stones- 66.5 million
do a search on led zeppelin and you will see in 1990 the totals for the studio stuff was not very high. example in 1990 physical graffitti was 4 million sold and now it is 16 million sold. another example IV is certified 10 million in 1990 and in 2006 was 23 million so it moved 13 million units in 16 years. just those 2 albums gives zeppelin a sales total 25 million since 1990.
if you want i could give you the sales total of every zeppelin album from 1990-2012 and you can see even if every stones album ever released sold 1 million albums from 1990-2012 its still not enough to pass zeppelins sales in that same timeframe
I'd like to see the amounts for royalties Zep owes to all they ripped off. This would include mechanicals, synch licenses, and performing rights income. If the mechanical licenses were agreed at the statutory rate and not a flat fee, Zep owes
the farm.
Plant fully admitted to nicking Willie Dixon and that it's paid off. Which would make one think that they've paid all for what they nicked. They certainly could afford to since they sold so many copies.
Hmmm, not so sure if one song paid means other writers/publishers were. Did Plant mention Dixon was paid because they were sued by Dixon?
There was no mention of them being sued but the implication was obvious - they were. That was the only song talked about.
Quote
Svartmer
But come on...cheers Jimmy Page, 69 today.
Quote
StonesTodQuote
Svartmer
But come on...cheers Jimmy Page, 69 today.
was that a suggestion or his age?
Quote
Svartmer
But come on...cheers Jimmy Page, 69 today.
Quote
StonesTod
i just don't get all the negativity that zep gets here - and on a STONES board of all things.
Quote
jamesfdouglasQuote
StonesTod
i just don't get all the negativity that zep gets here - and on a STONES board of all things.
Me neither man, me neither.