For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
GumbootCloggerooI was at Sarstock and I wasn't embarrassed when Timberlake played with The Stones. I was embarrassed to be a Torontonian that day because of the stupid people in the audience throwing bottles at him. That was ridiculous. I quite enjoyed Timberlake's set, to be honest with you. I was surprised. I thought he was going to come out and dance around chairs and do silly N'Sync songs but his set was rather funky. He's got talent. As for his appearance with The Stones, so what? Kudos to them for thinking outside the box. And yes, if you're still upset or whatever by Timberlake's appearance then my advice for you again is, get over it! Are you seriously still holding a grudge all these years? Timberlake played one song with them. It's not like he murdered Keith and I'm asking you to get over it. It was just one song! Geez.Quote
The WickQuote
GumbootCloggerooTimberlake's appearance with The Stones happened years ago. GET OVER IT!Quote
The Wick
Also, isn't this the guy who tore Mick apart for the knighthood because he was trying to protecting the Stones rebellious legacy? Very rebellious of him with Timberfake up there.
So anything that happens years ago should be forgotten right? Interesting approach. "Get over it" is one of those expressions that when you look beyond the words doesn't mean much. I have noticed though that it's often substituted for people being embarrassed by something and not wanting to be reminded of it. Come on son, admit it, you were pretty embarrassed when you found out.
Quote
bv
Please anyone with a master degree in ticket sales and market economy. If the Stones were to sell their tickets at a price lower than market price, say $100, and the going price would be 3 times that i.e. $300, who would then end up with the difference, which is $200.
We are talking about 4 x 20,000 x that money i.e. quite a bit of money that would end up in some pockets, but certainly not the fans' pockets. And we are not talking writsbands or personal id sales like they have at Glastonbury...
Quote
saltyQuote
bv
Please anyone with a master degree in ticket sales and market economy. If the Stones were to sell their tickets at a price lower than market price, say $100, and the going price would be 3 times that i.e. $300, who would then end up with the difference, which is $200.
We are talking about 4 x 20,000 x that money i.e. quite a bit of money that would end up in some pockets, but certainly not the fans' pockets. And we are not talking writsbands or personal id sales like they have at Glastonbury...
I can see where you are coming from, but, with all due respect, I don't think it is a good argument to essentially say that it is okay for the Stones to rip off the fans, because if they didn't rip them off then someone else would.