Quote
His Majesty

Quote
NICOS
Let it Be is one of the best recorded album.......and yes the Beatles were technically a bigger studio recording band but I still prefer Beggars, Bleed, Sticky and Exile because they never get bored ....because every time I listen to them I hear something new ...as with the Beatles great but if you know the song you know it

It's the other way around surely...

There are loads of little interesting things within Beatles mixes.

Name one Beatle song HM that got something interesting in the mix that I didn't hear before.................

__________________________

Is soundscape a word? Yes -


Noun:

A piece of music considered in terms of its component sounds.
The sounds heard in a particular location, considered as a whole.

However the context of my post covers the opinion of music followers that encompass many levels of demographics.

Quote
Rockman
Beatles were Vaudeville...Stones Sexville

I don't know how to tweet or twitter or...nevermind...but I need to retweet this.
Thanks Rockman

Yes, isn't this news, but who's better than The Doors...???



2 1 2 0

It's still way too early to take this thread seriously enough to really join in but what the hell does this mean:

Quote
His Majesty
They aren't a rock and roll band though.

And God help you if you whip out the "they're a blues band who played rock music!" argument.

Piss off @#$%&!!

Quote
Come On
Yes, isn't this news, but who's better than The Doors...???

Virtually everything....my elbow...that rock...those leaves.
Gosh its endless...they were truly that bad


Yardbirds were OK once that Relf fellow left

Quote
Munichhilton

Quote
Come On
Yes, isn't this news, but who's better than The Doors...???

Virtually everything....my elbow...that rock...those leaves.
Gosh its endless...they were truly that bad


Yardbirds were OK once that Relf fellow left

relf was great until he went electric....

Quote
Rockman
Beatles were Vaudeville...Stones Sexville

and then there's vaude!

Quote
NICOS

Quote
His Majesty

Quote
NICOS
Let it Be is one of the best recorded album.......and yes the Beatles were technically a bigger studio recording band but I still prefer Beggars, Bleed, Sticky and Exile because they never get bored ....because every time I listen to them I hear something new ...as with the Beatles great but if you know the song you know it

It's the other way around surely...

There are loads of little interesting things within Beatles mixes.

Name one Beatle song HM that got something interesting in the mix that I didn't hear before.................

I dunno what you hear.

Quote
Justin
It's still way too early to take this thread seriously enough to really join in but what the hell does this mean:

Quote
His Majesty
They aren't a rock and roll band though.

And God help you if you whip out the "they're a blues band who played rock music!" argument.

It means they aren't a rock and roll band.

This is painful.

Well pray tell, how do you classify them then? Polka?

Quote
Chris Fountain

Quote
His Majesty

Quote
Chris Fountain
the Stones the greatest Rock-n-Roll Band in the world.

They aren't a rock and roll band though.

I understand the point- I was trying to dilineate the comparisons. Trust me, I know the stones cross all landscapes of music. Fair enough?

Groovy.

Quote
StonesTod

Quote
texas fan
I haven't posted here in months, but this one got me, mate.

I assume you mean studio records, and I might give you that, but only through '67. The live stuff, we shouldn't even discuss.

Also, I'm going to report you to Tod. As you know, he has strict rules about what's an opinion and what's a fact.

i appreciate the business.

it's definitely a fact that the beatles were the best; although some don't share that opinion.

"
No worry. Glad to send the business, although I never really bought into the whole "it's a matter of taste, not a matter of fact" thing much... It's an ok general rule, but sometimes objective truth can masquerade as opinion, or something.

Quote
Erik_Snow

could RS write something like The Long And Winding Road? Nope!

I'm sure glad they didn't! But, if you want me to agree the Beatles had the upper hand on melody....ok, yeah, maybe.

Starting to get cold up in the north, Erik?

Quote
Erik_Snow

Quote
texas fan
I haven't posted here in months, but this one got me, mate.

I assume you mean studio records, and I might give you that, but only through '67. The live stuff, we shouldn't even discuss.

Also, I'm going to report you to Tod. As you know, he has strict rules about what's an opinion and what's a fact.

I'll be sending you new music soon. Check your e-mail from time to time.

Hi mate, yes of course I mean the studio releases. Beatles was a lousy live band.
BUT; could RS write something like The Long And Winding Road? Nope!

I am very happy the Stones didn´t write a crap like this song. I am really happy!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-08-25 00:55 by carlostones10.

Quote
Justin
This is painful.

Well pray tell, how do you classify them then? Polka?

lol

Quote
carlostones10



I am very happy the Stones don´t wrote a crap like this song. I am really happy!

Better to write far worse?

....image what woulda happened if Lennon married Anita and Keith got Yoko



ROCKMAN

Yahtzee

Quote
njlstones815
Piss off

Is that the name of a Russian Band ?

HMN

i liked both beatles and stones, but while the beatles were catchy tunes and easy on the ear, with some wonderful songs, they lacked the energy, aggression, beat and variety that the stones had and for much longer.

when i listen to the stones i can go from something beautiful like as tears go by, to citadel, to something as infectious as jigsaw puzzle to aggression like rocks off, back to catchy sound like shes a rainbow, then on to blues like i got the blues.

i then go through various levels of sounds, speeds, beat, variety, melody, aggression, beauty in all those sounds.

when i listen to the beatles, i dont go through such a wide scope of experiences.

Good news Erik. In october there will be a completely restaured version of Magical Mystery Tour

-------------------
Keep On Rolling

The Beatles have never written anything that comes close to Back to Zero, Let's Work, War Baby, or Streets of Love.

And now ladies and gentlemennnnnnnnnnnn....the quote of the day is...The Beatles were better than the Rolling stones....

so the beatles were better and lasted 9 years and john wanted to be a rolling stone that is reason he played in the rock-roll circus,come on get real both bands were good in their own way.
ITS ONLY ROCK_ROLL BUT I LIKE IT,KEEP ROCKING TO THE STONES.

they would have continued to be that, if not getting confidence through drugs in the 70s

..And
...Hank with a lil booze and pain-killers
...Elvis pills ... peanut butter and jelly
....Zimmerman ..Woody...Charlie Chaplin and alotta smoke
.....Beach Boys sand.. substances.. Duece coupes and Spector
.......Beatles musta copped a ton of LSD confidence for the Sgt



ROCKMAN