For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
ABKCO's Entire Rolling Stones Remastered Series Now Available On HDtracks.com
Posted on Nov 9th, 2011
HDtracks.com Presents The Rolling Stones Hear and Win Sweepstakes
New York, New York - October 27, 2011 - HDtracks.com®, ABKCO Records® , Fender Musical Instruments®, Guitar Player Magazine®, along with Logitech®, IK Multimedia® and Alfred Music Publishing® today launched the Hear & Win Sweepstakes in celebration of the release of The Rolling Stones Remastered Series, high resolution digital downloads of original, classic Rolling Stones recordings available only on HDtracks.com from ABKCO Records
Fender Musical Instruments has created two amazing prizes to commemorate the release of these treasured Rolling Stones albums in stunning master-quality, high resolution formats. These include a custom-made Fender Telecaster® featuring The Rolling Stones Let It Bleed album artwork on the front and back of the guitar, along with a Gretsch® drum set that features the album artwork from The Rolling Stones Get Yer Ya-Ya’s Out! on the front bass drum head.
These are one-of-a-kind instruments and make up a total prize package that includes:
• Custom-designed Let it Bleed Fender Telecaster from Fender Musical Instruments
• Gretsch four-piece drum kit with custom-designed bass drum Get Yer Ya-Ya’s Out! artwork
• The AmpliTube 3 Pedal with Guitar & Bass Amp and FX modeling software + USB Wah Style Audio Interface and Controller
• Logitech Squeezebox which supports high resolution audio formats such as FLAC, WAV, AIFF, along with MP3, WMA, WMA Lossless, AAC, and Apple Lossless.
• Complete Collection of Rolling Stones songbooks from Alfred Music Publishing[...]
Quote
buffalo7478
Some help on this...maybe a really stupid question:
How does HD differ from a standard CD format? Does it have a higher bit rate and thereby more digital info captured?
Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
Before anyone makes an ignorant comment
Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
Music CD's have 16 bit / 44.1 kHz digital audio which is a substantial downgrade from the studio masters.
HD Tracks offers 24 bit / 88.2 kHz digital audio which is a more faithful representation of the studio masters.
Quote
NoCode0680Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
Before anyone makes an ignorant comment
My shoes hurt
Quote
gwenQuote
Winning Ugly VXII
Music CD's have 16 bit / 44.1 kHz digital audio which is a substantial downgrade from the studio masters.
HD Tracks offers 24 bit / 88.2 kHz digital audio which is a more faithful representation of the studio masters.
I wouldn't use the term downgrade as studio masters are analog and of course digital is just a representation of the analog anyway. Depending on the sound you are capturing, 16/44.1 can be as perfect a representation as 24/88.2 (for example for a pure, low frequency sine wave). The odds however are that 24/88.2 will be a better representation.
Probably going with today's trend of loudness and brickwalled CDs, only 2 bits will be needed in the future - translating either into silence or very loud sound.
Quote
nick
On HD's ABKCO page their is the following quote:
"Our 176.4kHz/24-bit FLAC files are virtual clones of the original master recordings, delivering the experience of sitting in the control room of the recording studio."
If this is true, does that mean we would never had to get anything else from that part of the Stones catalog again? If it's a clone I would think we have the Master Tapes ourselves?
[www.hdtracks.com]
Quote
nick
On HD's ABKCO page their is the following quote:
"Our 176.4kHz/24-bit FLAC files are virtual clones of the original master recordings, delivering the experience of sitting in the control room of the recording studio."
If this is true, does that mean we would never had to get anything else from that part of the Stones catalog again? If it's a clone I would think we have the Master Tapes ourselves?
[www.hdtracks.com]
Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
As far as I'm aware,in the case of analog studio masters,they take the analog master and make a digital master from it above 16 bits / 44.1 kHz .
Quote
kowalski
Note that you can apply until January 31, 2012 but it's only open to US residents.
...
As Beatles wowed us providing 24bit/44.1kHz FLAC files in USB, we'll see how the wind blows.Quote
donvis
Does anyone think these will be available in a physical media form or is that possible with the 176.4kHz/24-bit FLAC files?
Quote
Toru A
They also have 24bit/96kHz FLAC files for download.
Queen albums have been released on SACD(1bit/2822.4KHz) as well.
All of them are remastered by Bob Ludwig.
Do you have a link to this scientific paper? I highly doubt that 22 bits will give you anything useful when you're just digitizing analog recordings (or in general).Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
Before anyone makes an ignorant comment,it has been SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN that humans can perceive a difference up to approximately 22 bits / 96 kHZ audio under certain conditions depending on numerous variable factors. To be honest,I'm guessing from my recollection of the study on the exact # of kHz but,I am certain on the # of bits.
Quote
HonestmanQuote
kowalski
Note that you can apply until January 31, 2012 but it's only open to US residents.
...
Between the new Brussels Affair'73 not available in FLAC in the US,and these HD tracks contest not open for the non-US, sometimes I'm wonderin' who are these guys who works in the Business World, could you one day you All in the Business Ship, make somethin' for everyone Worldwide !!!!!!!
Quote
FreeBirdDo you have a link to this scientific paper? I highly doubt that 22 bits will give you anything useful when you're just digitizing analog recordings (or in general).Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
Before anyone makes an ignorant comment,it has been SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN that humans can perceive a difference up to approximately 22 bits / 96 kHZ audio under certain conditions depending on numerous variable factors. To be honest,I'm guessing from my recollection of the study on the exact # of kHz but,I am certain on the # of bits.
Quote
FreeBird
Do you know of any recording with an SNR of 124 dB? I don't. Certainly the ABKCO recordings needn't apply.
These real world issues don't just apply to playback. They're there in the studio as well. I honestly don't believe that you're ever going to get 124 dB in any kind of realistic setting. Yes, it may be possible in a research laboratory, but not with real musicians.Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
All 24 bit digital recordings have a S.N.R. of 144 dB but you will get a S.N.R. of 124 dB when playing 24 bit digital audio through your equipment with a 24 bit digital to analog converter chip because of "real world limitations in integrated circuit design".
Wait, are you saying that achieving 144 dB @ 24 bits is possible, but 96 dB @ 16 bits is not? Or is it something else you're trying to say?Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
This is still well above CD quality audio. I have never heard of any commercial digital recording mastered @ 16 bits with a S.N.R. of 96 dB. As far as I know,most (if not all) digital studio masters are degraded for CD release. Now,in some cases,there is a better option.
Maybe, maybe not. However, it's clear that none of these recordings have an SNR of more than 96 dB, so that can't be the reason the CD layer sounds worse - if it sounds worse at all.Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
As far as the Abkco '60's material goes,the studio masters are obviously analog - not digital. I believe that the 24 bit versions offer a better representation of the analog master tapes than the 16 bit versions do. I don't believe that I'm alone either. There are plenty of people with the 2002 hybrid CD / SA-CD discs who have posted that the SA-CD layer sounds better than the CD layer. SA-CD's use DSD instead of PCM but,the 24 bit PCM versions (HD Tracks) are sure to sound much more like SA-CD than the 16 bit PCM CD quality versions.