For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
letitloose
Will.I.Am gonna stick with Keefs collaboration with Tom Waits. Thank you kindly
Quote
71TeleQuote
letitloose
Will.I.Am gonna stick with Keefs collaboration with Tom Waits. Thank you kindly
Yes, the contrast in choices for collaborators speaks volumes. Keith, all is forgiven. At least you don't give us this kind of shit.
Quote
nocommentQuote
71TeleQuote
letitloose
Will.I.Am gonna stick with Keefs collaboration with Tom Waits. Thank you kindly
Yes, the contrast in choices for collaborators speaks volumes. Keith, all is forgiven. At least you don't give us this kind of shit.
something amazing is that "bad as me" is tom waits first ever top ten album...
something even more amazing would be if will.i.am's forthcoming album does NOT
go top ten, which is suddenly a possibility, even if a remote one.
surprised no discussion yet on IORR about where "some girls" charts?
Quote
nocomment
immediately after the AMAs, the track peaked at number 13 on USA itunes,
which should be regarded as the least possible success a Will.iam & J.lo track
could possibly have with such huge fanbases. it has since sunk to 16.
yes, a killer video could still reverse the fortunes of this track, that's
how it works these days, but given the colossal visual miscalculation at the
AMAs, its difficult to imagine how the same minds could have invented anything
great in the music video department. we shall see...
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
"I went to play material for the label and Jimmy Iovine’s like, 'Yo, this is dope. Who are you gonna put on it?'," Will says. "I’m like, 'What are you talking about? It’s finished, it’s me.' So, he’s like, 'Oh, you don’t feature no one?'"
I guess that is what happens when crap sounds more like feces (will's own words) than music... it needs FAMOUS guest players, hype, paid viral posters etc etc..... I can remember when popular music, a song, a musical song was able to stand on its own, without the need for ""Who are you gonna put on it?""
Quote
lem motlow
there are few things funnier than a bunch of rolling stones fans bashing club music.
its not for us,its made for young people to dance to in clubs that most of us ,lets be honest,are too old for.
Quote
lem motlow
no,the point is nobody cares.
what you fail to understand is that most stones fans come from an era when music mattered.you're getting all wound up about "THE commercial disaster of the year" when you're talking about music that is as disposable as tissue paper.
mick knows this,j lo knows this and will.i.am knows it.they'll be on to another project next week and the song will be forgotten,or maybe get sold later to use for a car commercial.
Quote
lem motlow
i clearly got you upset and that wasnt my intention.i didnt say anything about the entire world of music,if you would calm down and stay on topic-i was referring to the record and the genre we are discussing.
dance music isnt supposed to be taken all that seriously and it never was.
i travel alot and am quite aware of music from around the world.i've been to all those places you mentioned and more so you really are just talking out of your ass about someone you've never met and no nothing about.
i wouldnt worry too much about will.i.am or mick jaggers career if i were you,they'll be just fine.
Quote
treaclefingers
I'm amazed that MJ went for it in the first place, and J LO for that matter...and the record company.
Is it just because Will.i.am had that sort of 'brand' that they blindly went along with it (or deafly is perhaps a better description).
This is empirically, a bad song. Why did no one catch that, along the way?
Human error prevails every time!
Quote
nocommentQuote
treaclefingers
I'm amazed that MJ went for it in the first place, and J LO for that matter...and the record company.
Is it just because Will.i.am had that sort of 'brand' that they blindly went along with it (or deafly is perhaps a better description).
This is empirically, a bad song. Why did no one catch that, along the way?
Human error prevails every time!
as lem pointed out, bad songs can still be successful, if they've got the right
beat, and the right singer(s), and these days, the right video.
as mentioned earlier, the Peas had a big hit with "bang bang pow" or whatever
it was called, even though musically it was as useless as this one. but
the track caught the public's fancy with an expensive special effects video.
and that's why this track can't be 100% counted out yet, even though all the
signs are bad. if the full official video, once released, catches on, the
track could still have significant success.
so that's undoubtedly what will.iam and his record company and j.lo and
mi.ck were thinking. that even without lasting musical merit, or even
a decent hook, a special effects video plus the instant-supergroup hype
would be enough to guarantee success.
remember, when will.ie first brought this track to the record company, their
immediate reaction was that he better get some other stars on it. so they
werent exactly overwhelmed by it either.
Quote
treaclefingers
can you give me any examples of songs, that have done well, that have no musical value, that ALSO don't have a 'hook'.
Quote
treaclefingers
I won't argue with you that this doesn't have lasting musical merit, or that songs without lasting musical merit can do well.
But...and I'm asking, because I can't think of any examples...can you give me any examples of songs, that have done well, that have no musical value, that ALSO don't have a 'hook'. It's the annoying hook that sells a lot of people. Case in point, 'Moves Like Jagger' is a ridiculous song, but it has a hook...so while I hate it, I can at least understand what people are attracted to it for.
Quote
nocomment
update: despite the video being previewed on Ellen, the single continues to
sink on itunes, now down to #25