For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
klrkcr
David Schneiderman.
Quote
Sleepy CityQuote
Come On
Anita controversial? Every chick hangin around rock-stars at 1967 would have done the same...
Shirley didn't...
Quote
stupidguy2
Anita. FOr all her legion of fan-girls, this woman was a toxic component to the Jagger/Richards dynamic, starting way before Bianca came into the picture - Bianca just became an easy, available and convenient target. (she also kept her life separate and didn't interfere with the Stones despite the myths)
Anita began the rivarlies, the resentments, the chasms between Mick vs Keith and Brian and then MIck and Keith vs Brian and then Mick vs Keith. She thrived on it, got off on it.
I don't care if she was a muse, she had too much power over both Brian and Keith, always more gullible than Jagger. She was also the main instigator in the 'who-can-handle-smack-better' contests with Keith.
Who is he? Never heard of him.Quote
Edith GroveQuote
klrkcr
David Schneiderman.
BINGO !
Who can be more controversial than a two-faced rat?
Quote
sweetcharmedlifeWho is he? Never heard of him.Quote
Edith GroveQuote
klrkcr
David Schneiderman.
BINGO !
Who can be more controversial than a two-faced rat?
Right,I looked it up. Thanks.Quote
Edith GroveQuote
sweetcharmedlifeWho is he? Never heard of him.Quote
Edith GroveQuote
klrkcr
David Schneiderman.
BINGO !
Who can be more controversial than a two-faced rat?
The "Acid King." The guy that ratted out Mick & Keith at Redlands.
Quote
stonesrule
Prince Rupert Lowenstein brought intelligence and experience and honesty regarding money into the Stones camp. Don't see him as "incongruous,"...
Quote
Bliss
So...you think Prince Rupert, with his three piece bespoke Savile Row suits, his gold pince-nez, his Oxford education, background in elite merchant banking, and his aristocratic clientele is a natural choice and logical member of the Rolling Stones inner circle, circa 1969?
Yes, obviously.
Quote
Bliss
no one's disputing Prince Rupert's integrity or value. I'm simply stating the most obvious fact - that the very large differences between him and the 1969 Stones in terms of image, background, education and taste - make him an unexpected choice as a financial manager.
Quote
sweetcharmedlife
Michael Cohl
Quote
Redhotcarpet
Forget David Schneiderman, we dont know what he did and did not, he could easily have been part of the News of the world or something. Big deal, they needed the media and the media needed them.