For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
stonesstein
Treacle, never got that email from you about working a deal for some US 7" promos & PS.
Also, please email me your Discogs moniker so I can see what all you have.
Quote
1963luca0
DISCOGS is ok for mediocre collections. Usually, top collection include records that DISCOGS ignores. On top of that, listings on DISCOGS are approximate and this means that what makes a record rare/valuable is not underlined. DISCOGS is ok only for low-profile Collectors, IMO.[/quote
There's probably a way to say what you wanted to say, and not have been quite so dismissive.
Quote
1963luca0
Not dismissive at all: I do appreciate DISCOGS as it helps, sometimes. But when one comes to details and comments he has to face a lot of mistakes. If one collects hi-end, DISCOGS can’t be his bible. On the contrary, Collectors who don’t care about details will feel at home.
I confirm that true rarities are not on DISCOGS. As well as for outtakes on tape, there’s an inner circle of record Collectors of The Rolling Stones where co-sharing is limited and does not include DISCOGS. I myself love to share my know-how. My collection is open to all those who visit Milan and sharing info is the main goal of the reference books I publish.
That said, every Collector sets his own level. When one adopts DISCOGS has standard he sets himself quite low, IMO.
On top of that, prices reported by DISCOGS are totally useless.
They don’t tell if the copy sold for Euro 39 was M/M, if it has all the due freebies etc etc
Should one Collector stick to these prices?
Should he value his own collection on these uncertain basis?
Not my cup of coffee…
Quote
1963luca0
No problem. I propose you to stand correct and stick to what you please most.
My knowledge is already available to those who care: web sites are not the only possible way to access to know-how.
That said, enjoy your time and DISCOGS.
Bye,