Tell Me :
Talk
That is major wacky nutty writing there.
2000-2008,haha.
Implying that only the "other" party can be the voice of reason?
It is partisan thinking like this that gets everyone nowhere.
...sounds like the most reasonable explanation for everything to me too, Angee.
There was the economy, ànd the Live Nation battle (btw: still not over, I reckon?!), etc.
["I can hear the Bullfrog calling me..."]
Mickschix, I probably should have said he read it before it went to press, according to Keith. Approval is probably too strong a word, sorry.
According to Keith, he made it available to Mick, and the implication to me is, that Mick signed off on it, so to speak.
Of course, it is your choice whether to believe that or not. I do because (1) I don't think Mick would try to change Keith's/Fox's words, not
much, anyway, and (2), as I and others have guessed, Mick didn't predict all the attention to Keith's comments about him.
Keep that HATE percolating.
How old are you, 16? Duhhhh?
Apologies, you must be 13 or so. Explains a lot
Men don't think that way. If a guy calls another one fat, or has a small this or that, they usually go 'f*ck you' and laugh about it. If a woman says that to another female, they never forget about it.
Yup the Dow went from above 14,000 to below 7,000 under you know who. He even said it himself. "Why did the maket have to crash under my watch?"
Mitch, next time you feel the temptation to blame President Obama for he Stones not touring, or the sky falling, or the crops not coming in, or whatever, call Rush Limbaugh instead. This is a Stones forum. We discuss music. Politics are against the guidelines. You consistently ignore this to post your Obama-hatred and other rubbish here. Why?
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2011-06-20 21:27 by 71Tele.
As opposed to music sites where echoing idotic(sp) left wing talking points merely cement the perception that their purveyors are intolerant hypocrites.
As for the myth of the Clinton surplus, please see my post above.
A myth like Obama not being born in the U.S., which 50% of Rebublicans say they believe?
Racist????????????Where??????!
The point is, this is why there is no politics on this board. I do not respond to Stones-oriented posts with political commentary aimed at Republicans or anyone else. I cannot understand why Mitchflorida constantly feels the need to use this board for his bigoted anti-Obama rants and asides.
Also: Pointing out bigotry and ignorance is neither ignorant nor hypocritical.
Nope. Allow me to repeat myself...
The much vaunted $265 billion 'surplus' was merely a ten year projection itself based on the continued (unrealistic) growth of dot-com economy bubble. There was NEVER a surplus in the bank to "blow." It was always wishful thinking especially as the dot-com economy had already started to crumble when Clinton and the usual suspects started making the claim. But, feel free to keep believing in a lie if it makes you feel better.
there is a qualitative difference between a slip of the tongue (57 states comment) and something like committing the resources and lives of a country to fight a needless war based on a lie (or rather, series of lies). As for teleprompters, everyone uses one. So what?
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
MKjan
()
Date: June 19, 2011 07:55
Quote
mitchflorida
BLAME OBAMA . HE IS SCREWING EVERYTHING UP .
10 PERCENT UNEMPLOYMENT . FORECLOUSURES THROUGH THE ROOF
DUMP OBAMA, AND THE STONES WILL TOUR AGAIN
That is major wacky nutty writing there.
2000-2008,haha.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
Edith Grove
()
Date: June 19, 2011 14:34
Quote
bustedtrousersQuote
ineedadrink
yes mitch, the reason why the stones haven't toured Europe or South America or Asia is because of Obama. riiiiiiight.
Don't waste your time on him ineeda. There's no arguing with aretard. I mean arepublican. I mean there's no arguing with stupid.
They're all one in the same anyways.
Implying that only the "other" party can be the voice of reason?
It is partisan thinking like this that gets everyone nowhere.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
MississippiBullfrog
()
Date: June 19, 2011 15:06
Quote
angee
Looks to me like a few things held them up,
and now they're waiting until 2012.
...sounds like the most reasonable explanation for everything to me too, Angee.
There was the economy, ànd the Live Nation battle (btw: still not over, I reckon?!), etc.
["I can hear the Bullfrog calling me..."]
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
angee
()
Date: June 19, 2011 18:47
Quote
mickschix
I don't think it can honestly be said that Mick gave his " approval" on Keith's manuscript. I find that very hard to believe.
Mickschix, I probably should have said he read it before it went to press, according to Keith. Approval is probably too strong a word, sorry.
According to Keith, he made it available to Mick, and the implication to me is, that Mick signed off on it, so to speak.
Of course, it is your choice whether to believe that or not. I do because (1) I don't think Mick would try to change Keith's/Fox's words, not
much, anyway, and (2), as I and others have guessed, Mick didn't predict all the attention to Keith's comments about him.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
phd
()
Date: June 19, 2011 19:42
Wall Street has nothing to do with the fact that Mick and Keith cannot play together anymore ( it seems so far), that each contract has to stipulate how each of those 2 should behave onstage with regard to one another. As to Wall Street, we did build it, subsequently we are responsible for its rip manner.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: June 20, 2011 00:34
On the contrary: We can probably thank Wall Street for all Stones activity since the late 80-ies. Without the big money involved I don't think they wouldn't have continued through the 90-ies and 00-ies.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
mickscarey
()
Date: June 20, 2011 01:13
Quote
bustedtrousersQuote
ineedadrink
yes mitch, the reason why the stones haven't toured Europe or South America or Asia is because of Obama. riiiiiiight.
Don't waste your time on him ineeda. There's no arguing with aretard. I mean arepublican. I mean there's no arguing with stupid.
They're all one in the same anyways.
Keep that HATE percolating.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
mickscarey
()
Date: June 20, 2011 01:14
Quote
mickschix
Should be screaming about BUSH not OPBAMA, and by the way,we once had a SURPLUS of $265 BILLION which Bush blew...so, ok, back to Mick approving of the Keith book, Angee, you may be right that Mick never dreamed it would have caused such a stir...the part about his anatomy.....but I still remain doubtful that he read it at all before it went to press.
Yes, it IS the econmoy, stupid, to some degree also, it can't be denied. I have said it before, but I haveless $$ these days to spend on luxuries. GAS TANK COSTS A FORTUNE TO FILL! DUH! Who's WINNING here except the oil companies!
How old are you, 16? Duhhhh?
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
mickscarey
()
Date: June 20, 2011 01:15
Quote
mickschix
Should be screaming about BUSH not OPBAMA, and by the way,we once had a SURPLUS of $265 BILLION which Bush blew...so, ok, back to Mick approving of the Keith book, Angee, you may be right that Mick never dreamed it would have caused such a stir...the part about his anatomy.....but I still remain doubtful that he read it at all before it went to press.
Yes, it IS the econmoy, stupid, to some degree also, it can't be denied. I have said it before, but I haveless $$ these days to spend on luxuries. GAS TANK COSTS A FORTUNE TO FILL! DUH! Who's WINNING here except the oil companies!
Apologies, you must be 13 or so. Explains a lot
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: June 20, 2011 01:36
To put this Bush/Obama thing into an international perspective. Obama was greeted with very much optimism but hasn't, perhaps,lived up to the expectations. On Bush there were no high expectations, but he managed to underachieve even from that position. W Bush is considered, even in the U.S., to be one of the worst presidents ever lived.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
Edith Grove
()
Date: June 20, 2011 01:45
Let's put this thread to rest.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: June 20, 2011 01:52
Agreed, EG. It's going nowhere... . End, finito, da capo.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
Brue
()
Date: June 20, 2011 03:26
Quote
mickschixI'm starting to really believe that Keith has caused the fracture that will not be repaired, not even for the millions that weigh in the balance. Even money won't mend the band this time. His need to put down his band mate because of petty jealousies will be why we may never see the Stones perform again. Very sad, and yet I understand Mick's stand on this completely. Maybe he is not willing to pretend that he's over it, and that the remarks meant nothing. I think Keith has pushed it way too far this time.
Men don't think that way. If a guy calls another one fat, or has a small this or that, they usually go 'f*ck you' and laugh about it. If a woman says that to another female, they never forget about it.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: June 20, 2011 03:42
Yeah, and I always thought size doesn't matter (well in my case it does 
)
__________________________
)__________________________
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
mickschix
()
Date: June 20, 2011 13:39
Amen Stoneage, Obviously we know YOUR age STONESCAREY based on your brilliant retort! You see, when someone decides to take an unfair shot at the prez, some of us are compelled to defend him. Others resort to calling names and hurling insults,separating the white hats from the black. Good night.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
More Hot Rocks
()
Date: June 20, 2011 14:28
Quote
Rip This
yes I blame the GOP
Yup the Dow went from above 14,000 to below 7,000 under you know who. He even said it himself. "Why did the maket have to crash under my watch?"
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
R
()
Date: June 20, 2011 15:12
Quote
mickscareyQuote
mickschix
Should be screaming about BUSH not OPBAMA, and by the way,we once had a SURPLUS of $265 BILLION which Bush blew...
Ah, another myth,
The much vaunted $265 billion 'surplus' was merely a ten year projection itself based on the continued (unrealistic) growth of dot-com economy bubble. There was NEVER a surplus in the bank to "blow." It was always wishful thinking especially as the dot-com economy had already started to crumble when Clinton and the usual suspects started making the claim. But, feel free to keep believing in a lie if it makes you feel better.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
More Hot Rocks
()
Date: June 20, 2011 16:02
If you bought any stock after Obama took over you would of at least trippled your money by now. Maybe more. It's been great making a killing over the last two years!! Bought Ford under Bush at $2.49 a share sold it at 16.00 a few months ago. Thank you Bush for crashing the market and giving the opportunity to have money like you rich scumbags.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2011-06-20 16:45 by More Hot Rocks.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2011-06-20 16:45 by More Hot Rocks.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
ChrisM
()
Date: June 20, 2011 18:53
An excellent example of selective blindness...Quote
Send It To me
Who the f**k are those bands? I'm only aware of one stadium act in the known universe.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: June 20, 2011 20:36
Quote
MKjanQuote
mitchflorida
BLAME OBAMA . HE IS SCREWING EVERYTHING UP .
10 PERCENT UNEMPLOYMENT . FORECLOUSURES THROUGH THE ROOF
DUMP OBAMA, AND THE STONES WILL TOUR AGAIN
That is major wacky nutty writing there.
2000-2008,haha.
Mitch, next time you feel the temptation to blame President Obama for he Stones not touring, or the sky falling, or the crops not coming in, or whatever, call Rush Limbaugh instead. This is a Stones forum. We discuss music. Politics are against the guidelines. You consistently ignore this to post your Obama-hatred and other rubbish here. Why?
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2011-06-20 21:27 by 71Tele.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
mickscarey
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:10
I think it is Bush's fault that Obama has to use a teleprompter for everything - including talking to 6 years old.
It is also Bush's fault that Obama thought the USA was composed of 57 states.
It is also Bush's fault that Obama thought the USA was composed of 57 states.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
runrudolph
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:10
somebody stop this Mitch guy... useless and utterly racist bullsit.
Please BV, take this guy out
byeee Jeroen
Please BV, take this guy out
byeee Jeroen
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
R
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:16
Quote
71Tele
Hey Mitch, what happened to the surplus left by Bill Clinton?
.... every single time you insist on posting one of your idotic right-wing talking points on this Board you merely cement the perception people have of you as a moron. There are plenty of right-wing internet discussion boards when people like you can post your bigotry and invective all day long to likeminded souls in the right-wing echo chamber where this stuff has resonance. Why don't you confine your political rantings to those worthy sites?
As opposed to music sites where echoing idotic(sp) left wing talking points merely cement the perception that their purveyors are intolerant hypocrites.
As for the myth of the Clinton surplus, please see my post above.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:22
Quote
RQuote
71Tele
Hey Mitch, what happened to the surplus left by Bill Clinton?
.... every single time you insist on posting one of your idotic right-wing talking points on this Board you merely cement the perception people have of you as a moron. There are plenty of right-wing internet discussion boards when people like you can post your bigotry and invective all day long to likeminded souls in the right-wing echo chamber where this stuff has resonance. Why don't you confine your political rantings to those worthy sites?
As opposed to music sites where echoing idotic(sp) left wing talking points merely cement the perception that their purveyors are intolerant hypocrites.
As for the myth of the Clinton surplus, please see my post above.
A myth like Obama not being born in the U.S., which 50% of Rebublicans say they believe?
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
mickscarey
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:22
Quote
corriecas
somebody stop this Mitch guy... useless and utterly racist bullsit.
Please BV, take this guy out
byeee Jeroen
Racist????????????Where??????!
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:24
Quote
RQuote
71Tele
Hey Mitch, what happened to the surplus left by Bill Clinton?
.... every single time you insist on posting one of your idotic right-wing talking points on this Board you merely cement the perception people have of you as a moron. There are plenty of right-wing internet discussion boards when people like you can post your bigotry and invective all day long to likeminded souls in the right-wing echo chamber where this stuff has resonance. Why don't you confine your political rantings to those worthy sites?
As opposed to music sites where echoing idotic(sp) left wing talking points merely cement the perception that their purveyors are intolerant hypocrites.
As for the myth of the Clinton surplus, please see my post above.
The point is, this is why there is no politics on this board. I do not respond to Stones-oriented posts with political commentary aimed at Republicans or anyone else. I cannot understand why Mitchflorida constantly feels the need to use this board for his bigoted anti-Obama rants and asides.
Also: Pointing out bigotry and ignorance is neither ignorant nor hypocritical.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
R
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:25
Quote
71TeleQuote
RQuote
71Tele
Hey Mitch, what happened to the surplus left by Bill Clinton?
.... every single time you insist on posting one of your idotic right-wing talking points on this Board you merely cement the perception people have of you as a moron. There are plenty of right-wing internet discussion boards when people like you can post your bigotry and invective all day long to likeminded souls in the right-wing echo chamber where this stuff has resonance. Why don't you confine your political rantings to those worthy sites?
As opposed to music sites where echoing idotic(sp) left wing talking points merely cement the perception that their purveyors are intolerant hypocrites.
As for the myth of the Clinton surplus, please see my post above.
A myth like Obama not being born in the U.S., which 50% of Rebublicans say they believe?
Nope. Allow me to repeat myself...
The much vaunted $265 billion 'surplus' was merely a ten year projection itself based on the continued (unrealistic) growth of dot-com economy bubble. There was NEVER a surplus in the bank to "blow." It was always wishful thinking especially as the dot-com economy had already started to crumble when Clinton and the usual suspects started making the claim. But, feel free to keep believing in a lie if it makes you feel better.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:26
Personally I don't mind political posts but since I know the rules here we should be a bit careful with them. We don't have to ban anyone for their political thoughts, even if they can be stupid. Just end the thread before it gets out of hand. Mickscarey is ok, you just have to take in to account that he is a devout right-winger. I can deal with that.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
ineedadrink
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:29
better send Obama to the Hague because he uses a teleprompter! unlike Bush, who didn't do anything illegal or anything...Quote
mickscarey
I think it is Bush's fault that Obama has to use a teleprompter for everything - including talking to 6 years old.
It is also Bush's fault that Obama thought the USA was composed of 57 states.
Re: Blame wall street for no stones activity
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: June 20, 2011 21:29
Quote
mickscarey
I think it is Bush's fault that Obama has to use a teleprompter for everything - including talking to 6 years old.
It is also Bush's fault that Obama thought the USA was composed of 57 states.
there is a qualitative difference between a slip of the tongue (57 states comment) and something like committing the resources and lives of a country to fight a needless war based on a lie (or rather, series of lies). As for teleprompters, everyone uses one. So what?
This Thread has been closed
Online Users
davidestrada , detroitken , Fuman2 , Greg44 , guyrachel , intinublado , stones94 , Tubeman , vibrolux
Guests:
1855
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10