looks like 77 to me, Curt - by 79 that prayer-flag scarf was no longer with him

yes..i would say 77 too, especially looking at his hair-cut

Quote
with sssoul
looks like 77 to me, Curt - by 79 that prayer-flag scarf was no longer with him

Thank you so much for the ID
BTW we need to talk, I have a new email, which has sent you a couple, have you gotten them ?

Headway has been made on the project...

curt, you have email :E

Quote
with sssoul
looks like 77 to me, Curt - by 79 that prayer-flag scarf was no longer with him

I never cease to be amazed at your attention to detail.

Quote
Edith Grove

Quote
with sssoul
looks like 77 to me, Curt - by 79 that prayer-flag scarf was no longer with him

I never cease to be amazed at your attention to detail.

I must agree: The absolute best, almost supernatural !!!!!

Quote
with sssoul
curt, you have email :E

Much thanks for sending...though I may have a NEW issue with how the folks in new delhi set it up in that NOW it aint receivin' ?????

Perhaps the addy at my gallery will do it right, can you give it a ring ?

otherwise my option is using smoke signals to reach the windy city...

smile: thanks gentlemen! but it's not supernatural - it's love :E

A bit of historical note: The image was shot by Keith's Blind Angel.

A blind photographer?!!!

Quote
curt
A bit of historical note: The image was shot by Keith's Blind Angel.

I don't understand. Could you elaborate on this please?

I've always assumed that the "Blind Angel" was literally blind.

Quote
Stones Blah
A blind photographer?!!!

I suppose he/she could be "legally blind," just barely able to take a snapshot from close range.

Quote
Edith Grove

Quote
curt
A bit of historical note: The image was shot by Keith's Blind Angel.

I don't understand. Could you elaborate on this please?

I've always assumed that the "Blind Angel" was literally blind.

Actually quite well beyond legally blind, yet able to distinquish form.
The two prints she gave me of her work in '79 are most amazing.
And highly treasured.

Quote
Stones Blah
A blind photographer?!!!

Just as amazing was the blind print collector I hung with in N.J. late in '76, he would spend some ten or fifteen minutes with a high powered magnifying glass before deciding on a print. Only had 10% of normal vision !!!!!

Quote
curt

Quote
Edith Grove

Quote
curt
A bit of historical note: The image was shot by Keith's Blind Angel.

I don't understand. Could you elaborate on this please?

I've always assumed that the "Blind Angel" was literally blind.

Actually quite well beyond legally blind, yet able to distinquish form.
The two prints she gave me of her work in '79 are most amazing.
And highly treasured.

Thanks for explaining, curt !

Any more cool stories to share ?

Quote
Edith Grove

Quote
curt

Quote
Edith Grove

Quote
curt
A bit of historical note: The image was shot by Keith's Blind Angel.

I don't understand. Could you elaborate on this please?

I've always assumed that the "Blind Angel" was literally blind.

Actually quite well beyond legally blind, yet able to distinquish form.
The two prints she gave me of her work in '79 are most amazing.
And highly treasured.

Thanks for explaining, curt !

Any more cool stories to share ?

Aye...yet insufficient space exists in this place, and there be no right of campaignin'...

its 77 by 79 he had that pseudo perm going on

When did he bust up his beak? I thought he passed out into the amp in 1979.

ahhh - it's one of Rita's shots? and i gather she gave it to you in or after 79.
so: are you sure it's not from 78? Keith was of course in Toronto for court stuff in 78,
and i'd say 78 is at least as good a candidate as 77, going by the details in the photo -
but you didn't give 78 as an option :E

Another vote for 78. He looks healthy so it cannot be 77...

Quote
Edith Grove

Quote
Stones Blah
A blind photographer?!!!

I suppose he/she could be "legally blind," just barely able to take a snapshot from close range.

Consider the following:

1. A person with 20/20 vision.
2. This person runs from daylight into an underground, dimly lit structure.
3. The "moment" presents itself within seconds of arrival.
4. A fixed focus, automatic flash "point and shoot" is brought up to eye level and the button clicked. ( Zero control of subject, lighting, composition or anything that rationally appliesto good images.)

Those were the conditions when this was shot on 4/23/79:




Which photographer was shooting blind ??

First thought is that it looks like 1977 but also 1978 when they played with Muddy Waters.