For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
dcba
Wouldn't CYHMK be a better choice than MR?
Sure but wouldn't it be a way to acknowledge MT's huge contribution to the song... a song credited Jagger/Richards!
So in order to not open a Pandora's box I guess Jagger will never ask MT to play on CYHMK or MMile.
Otoh MR is safe.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Quote
dcbaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Imagine he sues them (or theathens to do so) and after an out-of-court settlement he finally gets credits for these two tracks... with a reclaim on royalties back to 71 attached.
It's common knowledge Mick & Keith f@ckd Taylor over with these two songs.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
dcbaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Imagine he sues them (or theathens to do so) and after an out-of-court settlement he finally gets credits for these two tracks... with a reclaim on royalties back to 71 attached.
It's common knowledge Mick & Keith f@ckd Taylor over with these two songs.
No it isn't (CYHMK). As Taylor says himself, the ending was just a jam. And on half of that jam, Taylor plays Bobby's horn riff.
On Moonlight Mile, Taylor at least claims to have written the string riff, and not the rest of the song, as keith had written the first riff (aka "the japanese thing" ), and Mick J. the rest:
- I sort of had a hand in co-writing that, in a way. Or at least I wrote the riff the string part is based on.
Mick Taylor 2012
[www.timeisonourside.com]
Quote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
dcbaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Imagine he sues them (or theathens to do so) and after an out-of-court settlement he finally gets credits for these two tracks... with a reclaim on royalties back to 71 attached.
It's common knowledge Mick & Keith f@ckd Taylor over with these two songs.
No it isn't (CYHMK). As Taylor says himself, the ending was just a jam. And on half of that jam, Taylor plays Bobby's horn riff.
On Moonlight Mile, Taylor at least claims to have written the string riff, and not the rest of the song, as keith had written the first riff (aka "the japanese thing" ), and Mick J. the rest:
- I sort of had a hand in co-writing that, in a way. Or at least I wrote the riff the string part is based on.
Mick Taylor 2012
[www.timeisonourside.com]
Keith, Mick T and Mick Jagger have their own stories to tell about Moonlight Mile.
I doubt they remember it themselves.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
dcbaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Imagine he sues them (or theathens to do so) and after an out-of-court settlement he finally gets credits for these two tracks... with a reclaim on royalties back to 71 attached.
It's common knowledge Mick & Keith f@ckd Taylor over with these two songs.
No it isn't (CYHMK). As Taylor says himself, the ending was just a jam. And on half of that jam, Taylor plays Bobby's horn riff.
On Moonlight Mile, Taylor at least claims to have written the string riff, and not the rest of the song, as keith had written the first riff (aka "the japanese thing" ), and Mick J. the rest:
- I sort of had a hand in co-writing that, in a way. Or at least I wrote the riff the string part is based on.
Mick Taylor 2012
[www.timeisonourside.com]
Keith, Mick T and Mick Jagger have their own stories to tell about Moonlight Mile.
I doubt they remember it themselves.
They all agree, though. Why doubt them? Everybody says Mick Jagger wrote it, they all agree about Keith creating the opening (aka "the japanese thing" ) and Taylor says he wrote the motif for the strings.
The only thing they don't agree on, however, is whether the latter contribution was sufficient for a song writing credit...
Quote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
dcbaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Imagine he sues them (or theathens to do so) and after an out-of-court settlement he finally gets credits for these two tracks... with a reclaim on royalties back to 71 attached.
It's common knowledge Mick & Keith f@ckd Taylor over with these two songs.
No it isn't (CYHMK). As Taylor says himself, the ending was just a jam. And on half of that jam, Taylor plays Bobby's horn riff.
On Moonlight Mile, Taylor at least claims to have written the string riff, and not the rest of the song, as keith had written the first riff (aka "the japanese thing" ), and Mick J. the rest:
- I sort of had a hand in co-writing that, in a way. Or at least I wrote the riff the string part is based on.
Mick Taylor 2012
[www.timeisonourside.com]
Keith, Mick T and Mick Jagger have their own stories to tell about Moonlight Mile.
I doubt they remember it themselves.
They all agree, though. Why doubt them? Everybody says Mick Jagger wrote it, they all agree about Keith creating the opening (aka "the japanese thing" ) and Taylor says he wrote the motif for the strings.
The only thing they don't agree on, however, is whether the latter contribution was sufficient for a song writing credit...
I am referring to your first link [www.timeisonourside.com]. According to Keith It's all Mick's (Jagger). Keith claims he had nothing to do with MM at all. Who knows, maybe Keith's memories (if he has any at all) of a late night session with Jones: This "Japanese thing" is a terribly vague musical hint to me. The late 6-tees and early 7-tees were drenched in drugs. I doubt Taylor did the string arrangement btw, more likely Jim Price. Anyway, I haven't ever seen the score of the song written by the Stones yet. IMO it's basically Jagger having big guitar and vocals fun, so lets just enjoy the song. It's one of their best ever, a masterpiece actually.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
dcbaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Imagine he sues them (or theathens to do so) and after an out-of-court settlement he finally gets credits for these two tracks... with a reclaim on royalties back to 71 attached.
It's common knowledge Mick & Keith f@ckd Taylor over with these two songs.
No it isn't (CYHMK). As Taylor says himself, the ending was just a jam. And on half of that jam, Taylor plays Bobby's horn riff.
On Moonlight Mile, Taylor at least claims to have written the string riff, and not the rest of the song, as keith had written the first riff (aka "the japanese thing" ), and Mick J. the rest:
- I sort of had a hand in co-writing that, in a way. Or at least I wrote the riff the string part is based on.
Mick Taylor 2012
[www.timeisonourside.com]
Keith, Mick T and Mick Jagger have their own stories to tell about Moonlight Mile.
I doubt they remember it themselves.
They all agree, though. Why doubt them? Everybody says Mick Jagger wrote it, they all agree about Keith creating the opening (aka "the japanese thing" ) and Taylor says he wrote the motif for the strings.
The only thing they don't agree on, however, is whether the latter contribution was sufficient for a song writing credit...
I am referring to your first link [www.timeisonourside.com]. According to Keith It's all Mick's (Jagger). Keith claims he had nothing to do with MM at all. Who knows, maybe Keith's memories (if he has any at all) of a late night session with Jones: This "Japanese thing" is a terribly vague musical hint to me. The late 6-tees and early 7-tees were drenched in drugs. I doubt Taylor did the string arrangement btw, more likely Jim Price. Anyway, I haven't ever seen the score of the song written by the Stones yet. IMO it's basically Jagger having big guitar and vocals fun, so lets just enjoy the song. It's one of their best ever, a masterpiece actually.
He talks about the recording of MM there. He correctly states that he didn't play on the track, but that they used his idea "the japanese thing (Jagger on acoustic) on the recording. I've seen several interviews where he's been saying that.
It is indeed one of their best ever, my favourite Stones track
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
dcbaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Imagine he sues them (or theathens to do so) and after an out-of-court settlement he finally gets credits for these two tracks... with a reclaim on royalties back to 71 attached.
It's common knowledge Mick & Keith f@ckd Taylor over with these two songs.
No it isn't (CYHMK). As Taylor says himself, the ending was just a jam. And on half of that jam, Taylor plays Bobby's horn riff.
On Moonlight Mile, Taylor at least claims to have written the string riff, and not the rest of the song, as keith had written the first riff (aka "the japanese thing" ), and Mick J. the rest:
- I sort of had a hand in co-writing that, in a way. Or at least I wrote the riff the string part is based on.
Mick Taylor 2012
[www.timeisonourside.com]
Keith, Mick T and Mick Jagger have their own stories to tell about Moonlight Mile.
I doubt they remember it themselves.
They all agree, though. Why doubt them? Everybody says Mick Jagger wrote it, they all agree about Keith creating the opening (aka "the japanese thing" ) and Taylor says he wrote the motif for the strings.
The only thing they don't agree on, however, is whether the latter contribution was sufficient for a song writing credit...
I am referring to your first link [www.timeisonourside.com]. According to Keith It's all Mick's (Jagger). Keith claims he had nothing to do with MM at all. Who knows, maybe Keith's memories (if he has any at all) of a late night session with Jones: This "Japanese thing" is a terribly vague musical hint to me. The late 6-tees and early 7-tees were drenched in drugs. I doubt Taylor did the string arrangement btw, more likely Jim Price. Anyway, I haven't ever seen the score of the song written by the Stones yet. IMO it's basically Jagger having big guitar and vocals fun, so lets just enjoy the song. It's one of their best ever, a masterpiece actually.
He talks about the recording of MM there. He correctly states that he didn't play on the track, but that they used his idea "the japanese thing (Jagger on acoustic) on the recording. I've seen several interviews where he's been saying that.
It is indeed one of their best ever, my favourite Stones track
Quote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
dcbaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Imagine he sues them (or theathens to do so) and after an out-of-court settlement he finally gets credits for these two tracks... with a reclaim on royalties back to 71 attached.
It's common knowledge Mick & Keith f@ckd Taylor over with these two songs.
No it isn't (CYHMK). As Taylor says himself, the ending was just a jam. And on half of that jam, Taylor plays Bobby's horn riff.
On Moonlight Mile, Taylor at least claims to have written the string riff, and not the rest of the song, as keith had written the first riff (aka "the japanese thing" ), and Mick J. the rest:
- I sort of had a hand in co-writing that, in a way. Or at least I wrote the riff the string part is based on.
Mick Taylor 2012
[www.timeisonourside.com]
Keith, Mick T and Mick Jagger have their own stories to tell about Moonlight Mile.
I doubt they remember it themselves.
They all agree, though. Why doubt them? Everybody says Mick Jagger wrote it, they all agree about Keith creating the opening (aka "the japanese thing" ) and Taylor says he wrote the motif for the strings.
The only thing they don't agree on, however, is whether the latter contribution was sufficient for a song writing credit...
I am referring to your first link [www.timeisonourside.com]. According to Keith It's all Mick's (Jagger). Keith claims he had nothing to do with MM at all. Who knows, maybe Keith's memories (if he has any at all) of a late night session with Jones: This "Japanese thing" is a terribly vague musical hint to me. The late 6-tees and early 7-tees were drenched in drugs. I doubt Taylor did the string arrangement btw, more likely Jim Price. Anyway, I haven't ever seen the score of the song written by the Stones yet. IMO it's basically Jagger having big guitar and vocals fun, so lets just enjoy the song. It's one of their best ever, a masterpiece actually.
He talks about the recording of MM there. He correctly states that he didn't play on the track, but that they used his idea "the japanese thing (Jagger on acoustic) on the recording. I've seen several interviews where he's been saying that.
It is indeed one of their best ever, my favourite Stones trackQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
VT22Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
dcbaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why on earth should they be afraid of acknowledging his contributions?
Imagine he sues them (or theathens to do so) and after an out-of-court settlement he finally gets credits for these two tracks... with a reclaim on royalties back to 71 attached.
It's common knowledge Mick & Keith f@ckd Taylor over with these two songs.
No it isn't (CYHMK). As Taylor says himself, the ending was just a jam. And on half of that jam, Taylor plays Bobby's horn riff.
On Moonlight Mile, Taylor at least claims to have written the string riff, and not the rest of the song, as keith had written the first riff (aka "the japanese thing" ), and Mick J. the rest:
- I sort of had a hand in co-writing that, in a way. Or at least I wrote the riff the string part is based on.
Mick Taylor 2012
[www.timeisonourside.com]
Keith, Mick T and Mick Jagger have their own stories to tell about Moonlight Mile.
I doubt they remember it themselves.
They all agree, though. Why doubt them? Everybody says Mick Jagger wrote it, they all agree about Keith creating the opening (aka "the japanese thing" ) and Taylor says he wrote the motif for the strings.
The only thing they don't agree on, however, is whether the latter contribution was sufficient for a song writing credit...
I am referring to your first link [www.timeisonourside.com]. According to Keith It's all Mick's (Jagger). Keith claims he had nothing to do with MM at all. Who knows, maybe Keith's memories (if he has any at all) of a late night session with Jones: This "Japanese thing" is a terribly vague musical hint to me. The late 6-tees and early 7-tees were drenched in drugs. I doubt Taylor did the string arrangement btw, more likely Jim Price. Anyway, I haven't ever seen the score of the song written by the Stones yet. IMO it's basically Jagger having big guitar and vocals fun, so lets just enjoy the song. It's one of their best ever, a masterpiece actually.
He talks about the recording of MM there. He correctly states that he didn't play on the track, but that they used his idea "the japanese thing (Jagger on acoustic) on the recording. I've seen several interviews where he's been saying that.
It is indeed one of their best ever, my favourite Stones track
Pfffffff.. "I remember Mick Taylor playing that song. Real dreamy kind of semi-Middle Eastern piece. Yeah, that's a real pretty song - and a nice string arrangement". Mick Jagger, 1995.
Seemingly Japan is located in the Middle east. Your guess is as good as mine, let's leave it at that.
Quote
VT22
No, I don't know what you're talking about. Would be great to hear that.