I would say in 1980?

November 18, 2005

and March 4, 2006



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-04-10 15:35 by nikkibong.

It's a slow train....but it's getting closer and closer to the station...

<I would say in 1980?>

Watch your Hampton 81-DVD and say that again

Yawn, thud, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Never muppet!

Johang and nikkibong, maybe you would be happier over at the Osmonds messageboard or something? Because you´re both negative about the Stones most of the time, so I don´t know what you´re doing here really.
I thank the almighty, or whoever is in charge, for everyday my favorite band is still around. Negativity at this point of their career is meaningless and boring.

Vilhelm
Nordic Stones Vikings

One day (soon) there is no Rolling Stones. Then many people would pay 100$/warhorse.

And your point is?......

It's not something I've ever thought about, but I'll join in and say 1989.

Since when was a Vegas act banned in both ends of the world? The Rolling Stones are hard hitting and razor sharp and no Vegas act will ever do that.

Bjornulf

They started in 1981 and fulfilled their mission in 89.

Since when did the Stones play more than one week in a row in Las Vegas, like Elvis, Celine, Elton or other so-called Vegas acts?

Las Vegas is for stars that gets lazy. The Stones are not lazy. They could have cashed in, but they do still take their show all over the world, even to small places like Sweden, where Elvis never went, and where Celine hardy gets.

Bjornulf

I wouldn't bite.... ridiculouse thread.

mickijaggeroo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Johang and nikkibong, maybe you would be happier
> over at the Osmonds messageboard or something?
> Because you´re both negative about the Stones most
> of the time, so I don´t know what you´re doing
> here really.

don't really get your point - i jokingly referred to the dates that they played Vegas this tour . . .

nikkibong Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> don't really get your point - i jokingly referred to the dates that they played Vegas this tour . .

They didn't play in Vegas on March 6.

you're right - should have said march 4th.

And THAT would have made the joke funny?

i don't know erik, that's for my adoring fans to decide . . .

although i'm very curious as to how my comment was "negative" . . . perhaps you can shed some light on what your fellow Viking said?

bv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Since when was a Vegas act banned in both ends of
> the world?

I did'nt know they were. Where exactly?

Vegas act...

Gimme a break!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1989 with that team of back-up singers and 5 piece horn section. Be a rock band again! Just the boys plus a keyboardist and a horn player.

Can't wait for them to follow in Celine's foot steps. I would move out there hit the tables every day just hoping to win enough to see them once a week!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-04-10 19:25 by fv.

bv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Since when was a Vegas act banned in both ends of
> the world? The Rolling Stones are hard hitting and
> razor sharp and no Vegas act will ever do that.


I beg to differ. I saw Engelbert Humperdinck in Vegas years ago - it was a biting, riveting, bracing and hard-hitting razor sharp performance.

when Mick borrowed Liberace's costumes

Leonard Keringer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> when Mick borrowed Liberace's costumes


those weren't costumes

Some folks complain and cry when they do the junkie shuffle...than they get clean..more or less and its Vegas!!!pfffffYou dont want them to die now do you!!

T&A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Leonard Keringer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > when Mick borrowed Liberace's costumes
>
>
> those weren't costumes


lol!.......you're right.....that's casual wear for him

Leonard Keringer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> T&A Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Leonard Keringer Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > when Mick borrowed Liberace's costumes
> >
> >
> > those weren't costumes
>
>
> lol!.......you're right.....that's
> casual wear for him



Yeah - and you should SEE his costumes!