For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
LieB
It seems like music overall took on a much more important role to youngsters from the '50s onward. I guess there were some jazz geeks before that, but they (the baby boomers' parents) never really built an identity or bonded around music as much as "we" do. Or am I wrong?
Quote
LieB
This thread is great fun to read!
I'm only 29, and my parents were born in the early 1950's, so the belong to the Stones generation themselves. In fact, my introduction to popular music as a kid was very much through my dad's copy of Deep Purple In Rock and my mom's Deep Purple Machine Head.
I remember my grandmother (1909-2007) kinda liked the Beatles, but I don't think she or my granddad ever really liked the Stones.
It seems like music overall took on a much more important role to youngsters from the '50s onward. I guess there were some jazz geeks before that, but they (the baby boomers' parents) never really built an identity or bonded around music as much as "we" do. Or am I wrong?
Quote
Brue
a Boy Named Sue because that pretty much summed up his relationship with his sons.
Quote
baxlap
Around the house, she listened regularly to WOR in New York, primarily talk shows and adult contemporary.
Quote
noughties
Don`t forget there was a 60s beyond The Beatles, Dylan and The Stones that didn`t reccessarily belong to our parents.
I`m thinking of the world of "Easy Listening". Many young adults were living in a paralell universe with Burt Bacharach, James Last, Tom Jones, Engelbert Humperdinck, Playboy and Ford Mustang...