Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: slewan ()
Date: June 22, 2010 21:14

Recently I bought the remastered version of Let It Bleed. The back cover has a different running order of the tracks than the CD. Which one is the correct/original running order? And: why was is changed?

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: Koen ()
Date: June 22, 2010 21:22

So, what are the differences?

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: hockenheim95 ()
Date: June 22, 2010 21:24

on my CD and LP the tracklist is out of order...

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: skipstone ()
Date: June 22, 2010 21:25

The original record had them out of order. I've never seen it IN order except on the sleeve.

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: Koen ()
Date: June 22, 2010 21:33

Here's a possible explanation: [en.wikipedia.org]

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: hockenheim95 ()
Date: June 22, 2010 22:03

really? never heard that it was released in this order. is it hard to get?

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: His Majesty ()
Date: June 22, 2010 22:15

This bit true?

''When ABKCO first issued the album on CD in 1986, the CD track listing followed that of the LP sleeve, not the actual track order of the original album. This was corrected on the 2002 re-issues''

The earlier LIB CD I had had the same track order as has always been, ie not the back sleeves running order.

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: rootsman ()
Date: June 22, 2010 22:20

There is no (official, anyway) release with the sleeve running order.
All have the same/correct order.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-06-22 22:21 by rootsman.

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: R ()
Date: June 22, 2010 23:12

Try programming and playing it in the order from the back of the LP sleeve. Maybe there's a secret message.

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: rootsman ()
Date: June 22, 2010 23:56

I´ll let you in on a secret:

If you put Honky Tonk Women in the place of Country Honk - you can play it in whatever order - it´s their best album!cool smiley

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: skipstone ()
Date: June 23, 2010 00:49

The sleeve has the songs in order. Meaning, the actual vinly record sleeve and the inlay of the CD book.

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: rootsman ()
Date: June 23, 2010 10:00

The cake was made by Robert Brownjohn, and the sleeve design was by Victor Kahn.

On the back cover, the track titles are printed in a different order to the record, but Kahn says this is for aesthetic rewsons.
"I did it that way to get the right- and left-hand margins perfectly even.
Just (to show) the songs on there, not necessarily the order, because I put the correct order on the inner sleeve."


Taken from the book Rolling Stones And The Making Of Let It Bleed by Sean Egan.

Egan also says Keith´s preferred (working) title for the LP was Hard Knox And Durty Sox.

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: JJHMick ()
Date: June 23, 2010 15:50

The covers of both Through The Past Darklies also have different track listings than the actual records. Burn a cd with that order and you get a fresh new impression!

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: bolexman ()
Date: June 23, 2010 15:59

I have the 1970 "Let It Bleed" EP, released on the Mexican 'Peerless' label.
It has a great miniature version of the LP sleeve, in thick card. cat.no. EPP-1233

Worth mentioning here because it has an edited title track for 'Let It Bleed' that you can't find anywhere else.

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: skipstone ()
Date: June 23, 2010 18:02

The cake was made by a woman named Delia Smith, not Robert Brownjohn. He took the picture.

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: rootsman ()
Date: June 24, 2010 00:05

Quote
skipstone
The cake was made by a woman named Delia Smith, not Robert Brownjohn. He took the picture.

Thanks - it seems like Brownjohn took all credit for the cake...sad smiley

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: skipstone ()
Date: June 24, 2010 00:49

Maybe he or his people are just trying to take the 'Andy Warhol made the tongue for Sticky Fingers' route!

And I know Andy never said he did. It's similar to 'the Stones were playing "Sympathy For The Devil" when Meredith Hunter was murdered'. Just not true. And the people involved never said it to begin with.

So they mything continues...

Re: correct/original running order on Let It Bleed ?
Posted by: skl127 ()
Date: June 25, 2010 17:17

Would I be right in saying that Let It Bleed had no 'banding' between tracks, i.e. no 1 or 2 second gap between tracks - the remastered cd version plays one track right after the other with no pause between.

Cheers



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1540
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home