For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
schillid
I don't think I've ever heard them use that wacky phase sound on the guitar live.
Quote
skipstone
This version is supreme:
Quote
MathijsQuote
skipstone
This version is supreme:
But, there are no guitars!
About the Hampton version (which is the Still Life version): it's a train that starts rolling and never stops, it's aggressive, bold, punchy and punk.The guitars sound fabulous and are in my opinion true examples of 'weaving'. Jagger's vocals are fantastic too -low, mature, loud and strong.
As the the rest of the Hampton show: the Stones just do not get better than this.
Mathijs
Quote
StonesTod
well, we seem to have quite difference of opinion!!! what is it?
dog's bollocks?
tits?
balls?
can't we ever agree on anything here?
Quote
Paul KerseyQuote
MathijsQuote
skipstone
This version is supreme:
But, there are no guitars!
About the Hampton version (which is the Still Life version): it's a train that starts rolling and never stops, it's aggressive, bold, punchy and punk.The guitars sound fabulous and are in my opinion true examples of 'weaving'. Jagger's vocals are fantastic too -low, mature, loud and strong.
As the the rest of the Hampton show: the Stones just do not get better than this.
Mathijs
This version is embarrassing. Crap guitars, those horrible backing singers. Urgh!
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
Paul KerseyQuote
MathijsQuote
skipstone
This version is supreme:
But, there are no guitars!
About the Hampton version (which is the Still Life version): it's a train that starts rolling and never stops, it's aggressive, bold, punchy and punk.The guitars sound fabulous and are in my opinion true examples of 'weaving'. Jagger's vocals are fantastic too -low, mature, loud and strong.
As the the rest of the Hampton show: the Stones just do not get better than this.
Mathijs
This version is embarrassing. Crap guitars, those horrible backing singers. Urgh!
I kind of agree; it is a good version. I like the Stones on Gibsons.
Quote
StonesTodQuote
boston2006Quote
VoodooLounge13
God neither version please!
You're kidding me , right ?
Shattered is the balls !!
oh, please! everyone knows it's the tits.
Quote
VoodooLounge13
I wish I was but it's my 3rd least favorite Stones song.
agree hampton is the best. great guitar work on the solo by ronnie and i like the backup vocals by keith and ronnie .Quote
MathijsQuote
skipstone
This version is supreme:
But, there are no guitars!
About the Hampton version (which is the Still Life version): it's a train that starts rolling and never stops, it's aggressive, bold, punchy and punk.The guitars sound fabulous and are in my opinion true examples of 'weaving'. Jagger's vocals are fantastic too -low, mature, loud and strong.
As the the rest of the Hampton show: the Stones just do not get better than this.
Mathijs
well on the hampton version keith is playing a fender tele and so is ronnie .i like the twang of the fender guitars .i think it works well on stones songs .Quote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
Paul KerseyQuote
MathijsQuote
skipstone
This version is supreme:
But, there are no guitars!
About the Hampton version (which is the Still Life version): it's a train that starts rolling and never stops, it's aggressive, bold, punchy and punk.The guitars sound fabulous and are in my opinion true examples of 'weaving'. Jagger's vocals are fantastic too -low, mature, loud and strong.
As the the rest of the Hampton show: the Stones just do not get better than this.
Mathijs
This version is embarrassing. Crap guitars, those horrible backing singers. Urgh!
I kind of agree; it is a good version. I like the Stones on Gibsons.