Perhaps the vocal from Jumping Jack Flash over the instrumental track from She's A Rainbow. It could be huge.

I leave it to Mickscary

__________________________

ROCKMAN

Ok I'm seriously........No........don't mess with songs

__________________________

Dunno what anybody thinks, but I don't

-------------------
Keep On Rolling

I'd love to hear some studio stuff in 5.1.

Quote
Sir Craven of Cottage
Perhaps the vocal from Jumping Jack Flash over the instrumental track from She's A Rainbow. It could be huge.

IMO, the only way the Stones will sell records in huge quantities again, unfortunately, will be if Mick or Keith die.

Copying the Beatles? Bad idea on so many levels. 'LOVE' was a surprisingly great CD though.

I dunno - I never got it. I only have The Cult's Love album.

Quote
Gazza

Quote
Sir Craven of Cottage
Perhaps the vocal from Jumping Jack Flash over the instrumental track from She's A Rainbow. It could be huge.

IMO, the only way the Stones will sell records in huge quantities again, unfortunately, will be if Mick or Keith die.

Copying the Beatles? Bad idea on so many levels. 'LOVE' was a surprisingly great CD though.

Everything the Beatles did or do was/is great

__________________________

Remixing some songs in 5.1 - interesting, but not essential. (SFTD is the only 5.1 stones track I am aware of)

A "Love" style production, with people in long underwear running around, dancing to medleys of Stones tracks. Absolutely not.

Indeed Sympathy for the Devil is the only one.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-03-26 00:38 by FreeBird.

no

I don't think even the Beatles should have done a Beatles Love style album.

NO! They should do NOTHING that the beetles do

I knew it I knew it .......thanks mickscary

__________________________

Quote
tatters
I don't think even the Beatles should have done a Beatles Love style album.

i like it. some songs are better mixed together than the originals.

to do that with stones songs would be great too.

Yes. It should be called "HATE".

Just what exactly is The Beatles' Love anyway? Is it even The Beatles?

Yes.

Quote
skipstone
Just what exactly is The Beatles' Love anyway? Is it even The Beatles?

Of course it's the Beatles.

Yup more words of wisdom from meekscary...
But I agree no. Love is a great album and very interesting, but the Stones should release a new album while they are still working together.

COPYCAT EFFECT... alright. Always seems to be alot of that in the music industry.I dont know now many out there who fancy themselves as another Mick Jagger.

"Does anybody think that the Stones should do a Beatles Love style album?"

I try to avoid thinking about such things at all costs.

I think it would be fun to hear what could be done with some Stones tracks especially when remixed in 5.1 sound, but I would prefer to hear some of the original albums remixed at least in Stereo, and a few in 5.1,
Mats

Quote
Sir Craven of Cottage
Perhaps the vocal from Jumping Jack Flash over the instrumental track from She's A Rainbow. It could be huge.

They allready did it on the last tour : Keith playing the chords of a song and Mick singing the lyrics of another one

Perhaps a better question would be - "should the Stones collaborate with Cirque Du Soleil to produce a stage show"? The answer is probably NO!
It worked for The Beatles as the imagery of their pop songs lends itself to being brought to life on stage. That and the genious of George and Giles Martin makes the LOVE show well worth seeing, a very trippy and surreal experience. On at The Mirage in Las Vegas.

No, leave the songs alone please!

Quote
Manofwealthandtaste
Perhaps a better question would be - "should the Stones collaborate with Cirque Du Soleil to produce a stage show"? The answer is probably NO!
It worked for The Beatles as the imagery of their pop songs lends itself to being brought to life on stage. That and the genious of George and Giles Martin makes the LOVE show well worth seeing, a very trippy and surreal experience. On at The Mirage in Las Vegas.

I think there was a musical/stage show done on the songs of the Stones a couple of years ago.

It tanked.

You're right about the imagery in the Beatles songs and about the Martins however.

maybe