Re: Isle of wight length of show
Posted by:
retired_dog
()
Date: March 20, 2007 20:10
paulywaul Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I suppose ... it COULD mean that we get hit by a barrage of
> greatest hits; their thinking perhaps being that
> seeing as the audience is younger and likely to be
> less familiar with their material, the only thing
> to do is blitz them with a set of warhorses that
> they're more likely to have heard before and/or be
> familiar with ? How's that for a possible scenario?
Exactly. I honestly don't expect anything, at least not much, unusual. They'll play for a crowd which is not a Stones-crowd, so they'll do their best to convince them... And in the Stones way of approaching thing nowadays, they won't take any risks. I expect a setlist full of warhorses. This is not like Knebworth 1976 when a good portion of rock fans were also Stones fans who enjoyed their longest set with welcome surprises like Route 66, Little Red Rooster, Around And Around, Dead Flowers, Stray Cat Blues, Wild Horses and the like.
BUT I am pretty sure they will play their asses off. With this audience, they've got something to prove. And everytime the Stones had something to prove, they were extremely good!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-03-20 20:11 by retired_dog.