U2 PLEASE SPARE ME GREAT BUT NO STONES
Posted by:
dennysmith61
()
Date: July 24, 2005 03:30
Love U2 they are great but not legends nolearn Rock History
WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO BREAK THROUGH ROCK AND ROLL?
Sorry they are a foot note
To say they have been better since 89 no argument but that is like saying Larry holes was a better boxer then Ali after the Mid 8o's
Ali was the Greates compare the whole history
U2 has one sound a great one but where in diapers when the Stones were breaking Rock and Roll ground/History
When bands were afaid to sing that type of material
With out the Stones no U2
Wher is there Satisfaction You can't always get what you want wild horses Brown Sugar Jumping Jack Honky tonk Start me Up Paint it Black on and on.
Let it Bleed
Where is there Stairway to Heaven or Sgt Peppers? Or Dark side of the Moon
U2 IS A GREAT BAND BUT PLEASE LEARN ROCK HISTORY They haev no competetion and came out after all the legends peaked or were gone.
And write great Rock/POP
It took six Alblims for them Peak.
Learn History
They are the Larry Holmes to the Stones Ali
When they make 15 CD in 6 years like the Stones did in the60'S
And 13 good to great not including the first great Live Alblum Get yayya out
Not counting sticky Fingers Exile some Girls etc. In the 70's
Everything the Stones do now is Gravy
Everytime they do greatese songs of rock the legends have 10 or more U2 barely show up becaue nothing breakthrough nothing Classic
Just solid rock that I love
And write classic materia let me know
I maen Sting has wriiten deeper stuff and if the Police/Sting had stayed together that would be interesting I mean How Fragile we are WOW
Thatis who you need to compare to Police Duran Duran etc stay away from the legends
U2 great but not legenfs stay with the old ALI COMPARISONS IT SHOWS YOU KNOW YOUR WRONG
Lets see where U2 is after 40 years will they seel out stadiums?