>
> i donĀ“t think, that Mick has ever thought, that
> "Mick Jagger" could be more interesting than the
> "Rolling Stones". I doubt, that this was
> something, that he wanted to achieve by making
> solo-records. Why should he? Why should he compete
> with himself? He is 50% of the Rolling Stones, so
> why should he want to become more interesting
Forum:
Tell Me