Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.


Goto Page: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3
Results 1 - 30 of 65
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
Quotewith sssoul as for your other assertion ... nah, never mind! suffice to say: the Glimmer Twins' collaboration has taken many forms. it seems like you might dig these pages, youlikemick: You are rigth, there were many forms and they changed a lot over the years. On the above mentioned page there is a quote about Happy, maybe that is, what you wanted me to read?! I was referrin
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
Quotewith sssoul >> we don't know of any songs that Mick wrote for Keith to sing, do we ... well, i believe Party Doll is one, but that's pure speculation. There is something else what i wanted to say: Don´t forget, that Mick co-wrote many songs that Keith sings, like You got the silver, Happy... In these days Keith still did not sing the lyrics that he wrote, but they cho
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
Quotewith sssoul >> Is there any evidence that Keith wrote the lyrics and that he wrote them about Mick? << yep - there are early takes of Keith working on the lyrics; and that quote is one of a few that make it clear what/who it's about. I don´t know these takes. Maybe if i would know them i believed it. About this quote: i think there are obviously differencies in
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
Quotewith sssoul >> ">> The same goes for Almost Hear You Sigh << yeah, that one - even though (as i've already noted) i reckon the Glimmer Twins generally do a fine job deciding who sings what, one can certainly wonder how it came to pass that Mick wound up singing that one. Fight is another like that, albeit for different reasons. and it's so hilariou
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
Keith says very often, that he wrote the song, even when he only helped arranging a song, like sympathy, which was written by Mick, but he does not even mention Mick. Same with Street fighting man. That does not help me believing his comments.
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
this is Victoria Pearman, Mick´s partner with his film company/buisness, or how that is called.
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuoteAddicted Dear Bianca and Ilikemick: Fatcs are - Mick has tried, on several occations, to make it on his own. The result? He could barely have made a living out of his record sales. this is what i mean. (though i know it is offtopic here). Mick has not "tried" - he has written so many songs for the Rolling Stones without Keith (on some great Mick songs Keith does not play on
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuotebiancaIt has got to kill Mick that Keith gets as much credit as he does. I don't know how he stands it. Hm? I don´t think that Mick gets the same credit as Keith. Mick is the one who gets very underrated as a songwriter. It has become en vogue somehow to believe that Keith is the songwriter and Mick is the singer/performer.
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuoteangeeFrom what I've read, the "incident" may well have happened. Does anyone have more evidence that one or the other wrote the lyrics? There's no reason either that personal and social reasons could both have motivated the song's music and words. IF it happened, than it didn´t bother Keith, in Keith´s own words. So I don´t believe the story of the "hea
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuoteAddictedQuoteAddictedI think I read in Christopher Sandford's Keith bio, that Keith sat outside the film studio in his Bentley while Mick and Anita were filming "Performance". Keith, sick with jealousy, totally heartbroken, felt what was going on, and also sent people in with messages. So, if at all "Gimme Shelter" is an anti war song, some also mean that it's a
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
Quotewith sssoulyes, 3 pound 10 please. it's an obscure Stones allusion that amuses me, but if a translation is needed: that's the fee for services rendered. oh, how silly, now the penny dropped...:-)
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
meanwhile, Main Offender wasn't a "failure"; and the present participle of to lie is spelt lying. 3 pound 10 please :E thank you, i will remember - lying. hm, 3 pound 10
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
i don´t think we can jugde Mick´s or Keith´s maturity by their behaviour from 20 years ago. if Mick´s weakness were women, than Keith´s weakness were drugs and alcohol. (i personally don´t find Keith´s sense of humor very mature). i would like to add something to Mick´s so called "insecurity": i don´t know, where you see that. he does not seem insecure to me, not on stage, not durin
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuoteBaboon BroIf sales would be te ultimate measure of success; we'd all be Michael Bolton fans, wont we ? but would you call Michael Bolton "not successfull" ? I am not a fan of Madonna´s music, but she certainly is everything else but "not successfull"
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
mick went solo to try and rid himself of the stones and he failed many seem to believe that, and i don´t know, why. i do not think one second that he wanted to rid himself of the stones. he wanted to make a solo record like all the other Stones did. nothing more, nothing less. breathing some fresh air. and looking at the sales, he did not fail at all. imo.
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
Thanks for your comments. To be sure I have always been quite critical of Brian's supposed leadership, or that the band was "Brian's baby" (that is a compliment from Keith Richards that is taken to be way too literal by many die-hard Brian Jones fans). I view the band more like getting formed from two components: Brian's willingness to form a band of which he had a sketch
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuotemelilloI think after micks not so great solo career he had no choice but to concentrate on the keith relationship and do the best he can with it, from what i hear they almost never see each other unless it is stones related, its not like they holiday together or go out to dinner hi! i think if Mick thought, his solo career was "not so great", i think he would not have continue
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
What is interesting is the reasons for Brian's choice; why would he let these more 'better' players and real blues purists as Geoff go, and instead took a rock and roller like Keith in. What I have heard is that Brian wanted to have Mick, but Mick insisted that they will come as package (Mick and Keith). So to get Mick, Brian should let Keith in (and Taylor came as a bonus, I think
Forum: Tell Me
15 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuoteDGA35From the news reports I heard, she was in a doctor induced coma but she said her favorite musician was Robbie Williams after she awoke. I didn't hear anything about her awakening because they had his music playing. exactly. i live in austria and that´s what i also heard. Among the things she wants to do now in her new life is going to a Robbie Williams concert.
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
[ "he has that peter pan syndrome. I don´t see the point in trying to be 25 when you´re not. all he needs to do is to get to that f-ng mike and sing" -Keith Richards, many years ago well, when i look at Keith nowadays, i think, that fits better for himself (sorry, but i had to say that, i think he is more the Peter Pan than Mick)
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
sorry, but i don´t understand some of you here. Everybody is entitled to have an opinion, and if someone does not like Mick´s voice anymore, fine. but some of you are somehow angry at him, that he does not sound anymore like he used to. But i think it is just a natural thing, every voice changes. And many reviews of the last tour said something like: Mick was good, as usual. though he had som
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuoteDoxa The Stones have created a 'finished' product that might roll on forever, if they want to. I can not resist the temptation, so to say (and Jagger knows that!). With those 'easy' products, The Stones know how to please you, those sirens, you know... - Doxa[/quote But it all starts with the discussion, if they are still able to make a good album. they made ABB, some
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
i stated that in a recent interview Mick said that that happens. which means he is conscious of it. i think being conscious of it is a necessary step toward controlling it, so ... good. yes, that is what i mean. that he does not do it deliberately, as you say, it happens.
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
[ í´m sorry, it´s me again. i understood that interview more like that, what you say in your 2. sentence. (excuse my english) As far as i remember, he said it more like that he has to take care of his energy on stage, because if he doesn´t, it can happen, that the singing gets sacrificed to the dancing. As far as i understood it, he does not consciously sacrifice the singing to the moving.
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
[it kind of fits in with Mick's own recent statement that he sometimes sacrifices the musical aspects of his job to the physical aspects of it. he didn't really state that he learned that about himself í´m sorry, it´s me again. i understood that interview more like that, what you say in your 2. sentence. (excuse my english) As far as i remember, he said it more like that he has t
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuoteryanpowIt is true that Mick is the one who's really kept it together financially, organizing everything, and being one of the greatest front men of all time but the fact is the stones of yesterday and today wouldn't be a band people cared about if it weren't for Keith. Never underestimate either glimmer twin's importance. If any of the four remaining stones can'
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
QuoteLA FORUMI dont think Mick needs Keith like Keith needs Mick. At the same time Keith can be more interesting, when you cut the oneliner-crap and ignore his outfits, kicking, laughing etc (1989-) he is still Keith. He has depth and darkness and probably could produce more. But Mick has always been independent, Keith hasnt. Brian couldnt take Keith (the Anita thing) but Keith wrote Gimme Shelte
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
[ He does acknowledge that the fusses with Mick are greatly exaggerated, no doubt they are. yes, but i don´t understand, why Keith does not understand, that his own coments are the ONLY reason for that.
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
Quotewith sssoul>> strange how he brought that up << mercy: did you read the interview? the interviewer asked him about it. i read this interview (but i read so many these days..). if i remember right, that was the interview, where he was asked about Anita, and he said, that they "stole" girlfriends, but this was no big deal between them. and he said about Anita , that
Forum: Tell Me
16 ***years ***ago
ilikemick
So...you're saying that if he were actually 6'5"...he'd still wear these high-heeled sneakers? Hmm..... And if his hair was still naturally brown he would still wear brown hair dye..just cuz he likes it? no, i just don´t see, why he suddenly should have a problem with his hight
Forum: Tell Me
Goto Page: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3

Previous page Next page First page IORR home