"I told Mick it's a paltry honor ... It's not what the Stones is about, is it?"
I have to disagree with Keith's criticisms of Mick accepting the knighthood. Yes, it goes against the image of the Rolling Stones, but Mick Jagger is not the Rolling Stones, nor should he have to allow what the Rolling Stones are to define him as a person. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'v
Forum:
Tell Me