Quote
EddieByword
I download every source availabe (like most people I guess) and then listen to them all and keep the best. So far, Rskinno's have proved to be the best available except Houston where I preferred CaptainAcid's.

The Little tendies (don't touch me) New Orleans show was much improved by rsk's efforts. The original was dull and muffled compared to rsk's. (I've already said I didn't agree with him going against the tapers's wishes, nevertheless, he did improve it.....(imo...

Given that, I'm starting to think rsk is being stallked and bullied on this forum.

I do not say that rskinno's remasters sound bad. But if the tapers' wish is not to remaster and he does it nevertheless, the tapers will not share their recordings anymore and we have nothing. So a shared recording not remastered by him would be better than nothing at all. Just my opinion.
And that "remastering" is basically nothing else than equalizing the recording. Something that everyone could do himself quite easily.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2024-05-31 22:27 by wiredallnight.

Quote
wiredallnight

Quote
EddieByword
I download every source availabe (like most people I guess) and then listen to them all and keep the best. So far, Rskinno's have proved to be the best available except Houston where I preferred CaptainAcid's.

The Little tendies (don't touch me) New Orleans show was much improved by rsk's efforts. The original was dull and muffled compared to rsk's. (I've already said I didn't agree with him going against the tapers's wishes, nevertheless, he did improve it.....(imo...

Given that, I'm starting to think rsk is being stalked and bullied on this forum.

I do not say that rskinno's remasters sound bad. But if the tapers' wish is not to remaster and he does it nevertheless, the tapers will not share their recordings anymore and we have nothing. So a shared recording not remastered by him would be better than nothing at all. Just my opinion.
And that "remastering" is basically nothing else than equalizing the recording. Something that everyone could do himself quite easily.

As you can see above, I made that point myself and agree with you on that (even though it did sound better)...but there are some tapers who have stated here they don't mind their stuff being altered but then others (Holier than thou types) are coming in from the side and trashing rsk and trying to lay down their laws on recordings that are none of their business ....

Quote
EddieByword

Quote
wiredallnight

Quote
EddieByword
I download every source availabe (like most people I guess) and then listen to them all and keep the best. So far, Rskinno's have proved to be the best available except Houston where I preferred CaptainAcid's.

The Little tendies (don't touch me) New Orleans show was much improved by rsk's efforts. The original was dull and muffled compared to rsk's. (I've already said I didn't agree with him going against the tapers's wishes, nevertheless, he did improve it.....(imo...

Given that, I'm starting to think rsk is being stalked and bullied on this forum.

I do not say that rskinno's remasters sound bad. But if the tapers' wish is not to remaster and he does it nevertheless, the tapers will not share their recordings anymore and we have nothing. So a shared recording not remastered by him would be better than nothing at all. Just my opinion.
And that "remastering" is basically nothing else than equalizing the recording. Something that everyone could do himself quite easily.

As you can see above, I made that point myself and agree with you on that (even though it did sound better)...but there are some tapers who have stated here they don't mind their stuff being altered but then others (Holier than thou types) are coming in from the side and trashing rsk and trying to lay down their laws on recordings that are none of their business ....

Common courtesy is someone asks the tapers whether or not they mind before posting a remaster. The taper who posted the LittleTendies recording cannot post here but is well know and easy to ask. He was not asked where it was posted. Rskinno is also not transparent about what he does and put out a remaster of EdTyre's Philly recording a couple years ago and did not disclose it was a remaster. People downloaded the recording thinking it was Ed's recording and then contacted Ed to see if there was a problem with his gear. That and posting lossy stuff upsampled to Wav files is just not done. If it's a lossy source no reason to send out bloated lossy wave files. None of that really matters to some but most tapers are showing their feelings about it by keeping their recordings in a small circle. I guess you consider that holier than thou. Go enjoy your skinnoed recordings, I will listen to stuff that sounds good.

Quote
daspyknows

Quote
EddieByword

Quote
wiredallnight

Quote
EddieByword
I download every source availabe (like most people I guess) and then listen to them all and keep the best. So far, Rskinno's have proved to be the best available except Houston where I preferred CaptainAcid's.

The Little tendies (don't touch me) New Orleans show was much improved by rsk's efforts. The original was dull and muffled compared to rsk's. (I've already said I didn't agree with him going against the tapers's wishes, nevertheless, he did improve it.....(imo...

Given that, I'm starting to think rsk is being stalked and bullied on this forum.

I do not say that rskinno's remasters sound bad. But if the tapers' wish is not to remaster and he does it nevertheless, the tapers will not share their recordings anymore and we have nothing. So a shared recording not remastered by him would be better than nothing at all. Just my opinion.
And that "remastering" is basically nothing else than equalizing the recording. Something that everyone could do himself quite easily.

As you can see above, I made that point myself and agree with you on that (even though it did sound better)...but there are some tapers who have stated here they don't mind their stuff being altered but then others (Holier than thou types) are coming in from the side and trashing rsk and trying to lay down their laws on recordings that are none of their business ....

Common courtesy is someone asks the tapers whether or not they mind before posting a remaster. The taper who posted the LittleTendies recording cannot post here but is well know and easy to ask. He was not asked where it was posted. Rskinno is also not transparent about what he does and put out a remaster of EdTyre's Philly recording a couple years ago and did not disclose it was a remaster. People downloaded the recording thinking it was Ed's recording and then contacted Ed to see if there was a problem with his gear. That and posting lossy stuff upsampled to Wav files is just not done. If it's a lossy source no reason to send out bloated lossy wave files. None of that really matters to some but most tapers are showing their feelings about it by keeping their recordings in a small circle. I guess you consider that holier than thou. Go enjoy your skinnoed recordings, I will listen to stuff that sounds good.

As I've said now three times, I agreed with you and wirdedallnight about 'remastering' stuff when specifically asked not to, if only because it reduces the amount of stuff available.....the rest of it, you seem to be a bit of a control freak. Who says it's not on, why is anyone obliged to comply with your sentiments about anything that doesn't involve your recordings? They're not.

As for rsk stuff versus yours, I've got quite a few of yours already, they are ok, some are quite enjoyable in fact but as there are some perfectly adequate alternates around I'm not going to cry about not having them and am certainly not going to metaphorically 'blow you' to get some more. F that for a game of conkers, as we say here in good ole blighty.

"Holier than thou"....I think I might have been too generous there. I honestly think you may be a love child of DJT, the way you have latched on to rsk like a corgi on a cow's heel banging on with the same old crap for literally years. "Nobody's ever seen anything like it"....

For someone who's into records (even if they are stolen records of other people's creativity from sneaking round pop concerts, you sure could do with changing yours. It is effing tedious beyond words and as far as rsk goes, I honestly think it's borderline psychotic. I take my leave. Ciao.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-06-01 06:08 by EddieByword.

Quote
EddieByword

As I've said now three times, I agreed with you and wirdedallnight about 'remastering' stuff when specifically asked not to, if only because it reduces the amount of stuff available.....the rest of it, you seem to be a bit of a control freak. Who says it's not on, why is anyone obliged to comply with your sentiments about anything that doesn't involve your recordings? They're not.

As for rsk stuff versus yours, I've got quite a few of yours already, they are ok, some are quite enjoyable in fact but as there are some perfectly adequate alternates around I'm not going to cry about not having them and am certainly not going to metaphorically 'blow you' to get some more. F that for a game of conkers, as we say here in good ole blighty.

"Holier than thou"....I think I might have been too generous there. I honestly think you may be a love child of DJT, the way you have latched on to rsk like a corgi on a cow's heel banging on with the same old crap for literally years. "Nobody's ever seen anything like it"....

For someone who's into records (even if they are stolen records of other people's creativity from sneaking round pop concerts, you sure could do with changing yours. It is effing tedious beyond words and as far as rsk goes, I honestly think it's borderline psychotic. I take my leave. Ciao.

You speak out of both sides of your mouth and are way way off base with that DJT comment. It sure seems like you are butthurt you can't always get what you want but with rsk you get what you need.

Quote
daspyknows

Quote
EddieByword

As I've said now three times, I agreed with you and wirdedallnight about 'remastering' stuff when specifically asked not to, if only because it reduces the amount of stuff available.....the rest of it, you seem to be a bit of a control freak. Who says it's not on, why is anyone obliged to comply with your sentiments about anything that doesn't involve your recordings? They're not.

As for rsk stuff versus yours, I've got quite a few of yours already, they are ok, some are quite enjoyable in fact but as there are some perfectly adequate alternates around I'm not going to cry about not having them and am certainly not going to metaphorically 'blow you' to get some more. F that for a game of conkers, as we say here in good ole blighty.

"Holier than thou"....I think I might have been too generous there. I honestly think you may be a love child of DJT, the way you have latched on to rsk like a corgi on a cow's heel banging on with the same old crap for literally years. "Nobody's ever seen anything like it"....

For someone who's into records (even if they are stolen records of other people's creativity from sneaking round pop concerts, you sure could do with changing yours. It is effing tedious beyond words and as far as rsk goes, I honestly think it's borderline psychotic. I take my leave. Ciao.

You speak out of both sides of your mouth and are way way off base with that DJT comment. It sure seems like you are butthurt you can't always get what you want but with rsk you get what you need.

Yeah sure.........maybe I'll send rsk my copies of 'your' shows....



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-06-01 06:44 by EddieByword.

THX

Quote
EddieByword

Quote
daspyknows

Quote
EddieByword

As I've said now three times, I agreed with you and wirdedallnight about 'remastering' stuff when specifically asked not to, if only because it reduces the amount of stuff available.....the rest of it, you seem to be a bit of a control freak. Who says it's not on, why is anyone obliged to comply with your sentiments about anything that doesn't involve your recordings? They're not.

As for rsk stuff versus yours, I've got quite a few of yours already, they are ok, some are quite enjoyable in fact but as there are some perfectly adequate alternates around I'm not going to cry about not having them and am certainly not going to metaphorically 'blow you' to get some more. F that for a game of conkers, as we say here in good ole blighty.

"Holier than thou"....I think I might have been too generous there. I honestly think you may be a love child of DJT, the way you have latched on to rsk like a corgi on a cow's heel banging on with the same old crap for literally years. "Nobody's ever seen anything like it"....

For someone who's into records (even if they are stolen records of other people's creativity from sneaking round pop concerts, you sure could do with changing yours. It is effing tedious beyond words and as far as rsk goes, I honestly think it's borderline psychotic. I take my leave. Ciao.

You speak out of both sides of your mouth and are way way off base with that DJT comment. It sure seems like you are butthurt you can't always get what you want but with rsk you get what you need.

Yeah sure.........maybe I'll send rsk my copies of 'your' shows....

I believe you would so obviously you are not going to receive these.

Quote
daspyknows

Quote
EddieByword

Quote
daspyknows

Quote
EddieByword

As I've said now three times, I agreed with you and wirdedallnight about 'remastering' stuff when specifically asked not to, if only because it reduces the amount of stuff available.....the rest of it, you seem to be a bit of a control freak. Who says it's not on, why is anyone obliged to comply with your sentiments about anything that doesn't involve your recordings? They're not.

As for rsk stuff versus yours, I've got quite a few of yours already, they are ok, some are quite enjoyable in fact but as there are some perfectly adequate alternates around I'm not going to cry about not having them and am certainly not going to metaphorically 'blow you' to get some more. F that for a game of conkers, as we say here in good ole blighty.

"Holier than thou"....I think I might have been too generous there. I honestly think you may be a love child of DJT, the way you have latched on to rsk like a corgi on a cow's heel banging on with the same old crap for literally years. "Nobody's ever seen anything like it"....

For someone who's into records (even if they are stolen records of other people's creativity from sneaking round pop concerts, you sure could do with changing yours. It is effing tedious beyond words and as far as rsk goes, I honestly think it's borderline psychotic. I take my leave. Ciao.

You speak out of both sides of your mouth and are way way off base with that DJT comment. It sure seems like you are butthurt you can't always get what you want but with rsk you get what you need.

Yeah sure.........maybe I'll send rsk my copies of 'your' shows....

I believe you would so obviously you are not going to receive these.

You know what, I believe that was always going to be the case anyway ...lol..>< ... that is funny....... (btw, I'm not that petty.......but, on reflection, that might be funny tooo



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-06-01 19:08 by EddieByword.

Well, are here some people acting like a little child, or is it toys for boys?
@ daspyknows; for the second time my question to you; will you be so kind to respond to me? Thanks in advance!

Quote
Racca1962
Well, are here some people acting like a little child, or is it toys for boys?
@ daspyknows; for the second time my question to you; will you be so kind to respond to me? Thanks in advance!

Reach out to me off of this site and let's chat.

Well Daspyknows, thanks for your reaction. You may contact me at ericar58@outlook.com

This is all very sad and the fair Stones fan has to suffer because of it, dear daspyknows. I only want to listen to a good sounded gig from the current US tour.
I need it only for private use.

Hello Daspyknows, please answer me. Thanx in advance

sway1971@freenet.de

Quote
wupperstein
This is all very sad and the fair Stones fan has to suffer because of it, dear daspyknows. I only want to listen to a good sounded gig from the current US tour.
I need it only for private use.

Dem kann Ich nur beipflichten, sehr traurig

This sounds INCREDIBLE, and I was there!! Thank you so much for this.

Hello,
Is it possible this is still on the table?? I would love the complete show for my own personal listening. Please let me know!!
Thank you.

Quote
buddywaters
Hello,
Is it possible this is still on the table?? I would love the complete show for my own personal listening. Please let me know!!
Thank you.

I’m reuploading the rsKinno “remaster” since this is the thread for that, but adding the following info:
-sbalde

[we.tl]
(Link good for 7 days)

The Rolling Stones
Sunday, 2024/05/26
MetLife Stadium
East Rutherford, NJ, USA
Section 126, Row 38

Recorded by: sbalde
iPhone 13 Pro > Internal Mics > iMovie 10.4.2 > Audacity 3.0.2

01 Intro
02 Start Me Up
03 Get Off Of My Cloud
04 Bitch (tour debut)
05 Angry
06 Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo (Heartbreaker) (tour debut; fan-voted song)
07 Wild Horses
08 Tumbling Dice
09 Whole Wide World
10 You Can't Always Get What You Want
11 Band introductions
12 Tell Me Straight (live debut)
13 Little T&A
14 Sympathy For The Devil
15 Honky Tonk Women
16 Midnight Rambler (tour debut; with a snippet of Robert Johnson's "Come On in My Kitchen")
17 Gimme Shelter
18 Paint It Black
19 Jumpin’ Jack Flash
20 Sweet Sounds Of Heaven
21 (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction


*Please note: this is NOT the same recording as the Midnight Rambler sample uploaded by dapsyknows, which sounds far superior.

Thank you so much!!!

I agree, Daspy's work is remarkable, and so is the song picked. That was the one I'd been waiting for all tour. I've listened to Daspy's remaster several times already.

Unfortunately, the best recording of this show is Daspy's but he won't share it for personal reasons of others pirating his work. Some of the recordings I have made I couldn't wait to share on this board as I know how much they are appreciated (especially by those who were there), as I appreciate other recorder's work.

The best circulating version is the Falo's audio used for MfG 164

Quote
buddywaters
Thank you so much!!!

I agree, Daspy's work is remarkable, and so is the song picked. That was the one I'd been waiting for all tour. I've listened to Daspy's remaster several times already.

My recording is not the remaster.

Where can I find Falo's?

Indeed, but it should be considered a masterful recording that I'd love to hear in full should you be feeling generous!!

Daspy, would you be more keen to share if it was sent privately? Your mix of Rambler is the best I have heard, and I was at the show. It's better than it was live.

Quote
buddywaters
Daspy, would you be more keen to share if it was sent privately? Your mix of Rambler is the best I have heard, and I was at the show. It's better than it was live.

I agree. I was at this show too and Daspy's MR recording is by far the best of the few recordings that I have heard.

I too would love a copy of the complete recording.