Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: marko ()
Date: July 28, 2011 12:54

Mine is very thin sounding,distant,,,i want to know whats the best one?

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: Amarant ()
Date: July 28, 2011 13:27

I have 2 versions:

The silkcut version Wav (thin sound) and the Bol version MP3 256 much better sound.

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: marko ()
Date: July 28, 2011 14:02

can you post the better one?

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: Amarant ()
Date: July 28, 2011 15:04

There is also :

Download Here "LONDON CALLING Vol.2" London O2 08-23-2007 Falo MATRIX CD 1
Download Here "LONDON CALLING Vol.2" London O2 08-23-2007 Falo MATRIX CD 2


Artwork
Download Here Art Zip-Files
Gigasize still available!

Quality same as the silkcut version.

I shall upload the Bol version.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2011-07-28 15:31 by Amarant.

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: Bol ()
Date: July 28, 2011 15:53

Should I re-post this one in FLAC (now I know how to convert the original files)?

I have been experiencing problems uploading to Megaupload and MediaFire recently, so any advice would be appreciated.

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: marko ()
Date: July 28, 2011 16:10

Megaupload,if you can make it work,i don´t have any problems with mega.

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: Bol ()
Date: July 29, 2011 10:53

I won't be able to post this for about a week (if I have no trouble with Megaupload).

I see that Amarant has posted an mp3 version. Will this do or do you still want it in FLAC?

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: marko ()
Date: July 29, 2011 11:44

Thanks! i´m fine with Mp3,because i will remaster this anyway,so it´ll be in flac after all

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: bigtyke66 ()
Date: July 30, 2011 21:58

Marko, Do you mean you go MP3>wav>remaster>Flac? Surely it would be better to remaster the lossless files to retain as much audio quality as possible. Not knocking--Just wondering.

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: marko ()
Date: July 30, 2011 22:05

I burn files on Re-writable cdr,then on i remaster thru nakamichi tapedeck and harman&kardon 20 channel equalizer.And burn music on Audio CDR.Theres no diference in quality,is it MP3 or Flac.But,MP3´s has lot more these digital noises sometimes,aka burning errors.

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: vancouver ()
Date: July 30, 2011 22:32

Quote
marko
I burn files on Re-writable cdr,then on i remaster thru nakamichi tapedeck and harman&kardon 20 channel equalizer.And burn music on Audio CDR.Theres no diference in quality,is it MP3 or Flac.But,MP3´s has lot more these digital noises sometimes,aka burning errors.

if it is converted to mp3 .it is already destroyed.

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: marko ()
Date: July 30, 2011 23:26

i know what you mean,i thinksmiling smiley

but these london o2 files were fine.

Re: London 23.8.2007 best recording?
Posted by: bigtyke66 ()
Date: July 31, 2011 02:48

Flac compresses whatever you feed into it. If it's Mp3 quality, it compresses at Mp3 quality; if it's 24/96 hi res audio, it compresses that. For this type of editing etc. it really is best to work with at least 16/44 audio files--or at least the highest res files that are available.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1723
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home