Hello!
Recently vancouver posted his source of the Stones Malmoe 70 show here.
Some people wanted a not eq. and speed-corrected version; vancouver couldn't do the speed-up, so I stepped in.
I will post three songs - JJF/DF/HTW - not eq., but speeded up at 6%, 5% and 4%;
please let us know, what you think might be the correct speed.

Mp.3 files 6%:
[www.sendspace.com]
[www.sendspace.com]
[www.sendspace.com]

Mp.3 files 5%:
[www.sendspace.com]
[www.sendspace.com]
[www.sendspace.com]

Mp.3 files 4%:
[www.sendspace.com]
[www.sendspace.com]
[www.sendspace.com]

This is a work in progress, the other links will follow soon!

Upload is now complete; if you want me to upload samples at a still different speed, please let me know



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2009-11-28 19:15 by Rank Stranger.

I tuned my guitar ans tried the two +5 and +6 JJF speed. My opinion the +5 is correct and no need to listen to the +4.

+6% imho. I find it more natural than +5...

the other source ? the speed faster or slower ?

Faster, the original drags somewhat

someone should do merge stereo of these two sources

straycat58 can you please check the other songs too?
Just in case the batteries decreased a bit?

Hi all,
Any news on a new definitive speed-corrected upload? Or: is this it.
Thanks for a reply and any help on this one.
Alex.

Quote
alexander paul
Hi all,
Any news on a new definitive speed-corrected upload? Or: is this it.
Thanks for a reply and any help on this one.
Alex.

if someone wanted ?? .i can reupload it again.

The 5% sounds like it still has a bit of a drag on HTW. The 6% sounds a bit better on both HTW and DF in my opinion.

One of the better tracks to test would be Love In Vain with it 'slower' notes. Stones less likely to do a rave up of it like on HTW for instance where the 6% sounds a hair too fast, but better than the 5%.


J

Here we go:
Love in vain
mp3 + 6%:
[www.sendspace.com]

mp3 + 5%:
[www.sendspace.com]

i post it later tonite'