Keith is a genius. I think he sings better than Mick (although Mick of course is the best frontman in the world). So Keith must sing some songs. Slow songs, fine with me, but he must sing.

The most people are going to a show because Mick is the singer.

no what I have always been thinking is that Mick and Keith should sing together : memory motel, 100 years ago, happy
Mick should help during Keith set (i know ! he gives a lot already)

55 Rusty Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The most people are going to a show because Mick
> is the singer.

Yeah, and most people get up in the mornin' because its bright.

tomcat2006 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'd vote for Keef losing a song and Ronnie doing
> Seven Days - how cool would that be!!


Let Dylan do the Dylan-songs ;-)

..but if Keith & Ronnie were to do Sure the One You Need, a few of us might be quite pleased !

Spud Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ..but if Keith & Ronnie were to do Sure the One
> You Need, a few of us might be quite pleased !

and the other 35,000 in attendance would be completely baffled and clueless ;-)

55 Rusty Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The most people are going to a show because Mick
> is the singer.

Really I guess I aint most people then.

Keep your hands off keiths set.

Its only two songs ffs.

You want to an acoustic set great idea, extend thye show.

Start earlier or finish later but leave Keith alone.

Very True...but many are probably baffled and clueless anyway ;^)

Spud Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Very True...but many are probably baffled and
> clueless anyway ;^)

touchez

Hell yeah! then make the setlist 21-23- songs....

forget Ronnie's solo material. what about Micks or Keith's?
Ain't going to happen either, so go acoustic. That would be a treat.

-



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-12-31 03:43 by cirrhosis.