Well, I didn't see them live at Werchter, nor did I hear anything, but I saw some pictures, and...doesn't it start to look a bit, uhm, rediculous? Pathetic even maybe? I mean, Ronnie, Mick and Keith all dressed up in wigs and shiny jackets..it's not very rock and roll anymore is it? Charlie looks o.k., he looks his age, but the rest look a bit like dressed up clowns to me...

Mathijs
ps Ronnie: that wig is AWFULL!

Bad blend of pot last shippings to ol' Niederland?

You oughta see my hair. Damn, I wish I had a wig that looked like that.

"No Anchovies, Please"

Pretty sure those wear no wigs. There are some pics were you can clearly see that Mick's hair is getting much thinner. Ronnie's hair is definitely genuine, I'd say...


Belgrade-Bucharest-Budapest-Brno

Lorenz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pretty sure those wear no wigs. There are some
> pics were you can clearly see that Mick's hair is
> getting much thinner. Ronnie's hair is definitely
> genuine, I'd say...

Check that pic where he's laughing at Keith. If that's no wig, than I am a 6 foot five muscled-up basketbal player.

Mathijs

Baboon Bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bad blend of pot last shippings to ol' Niederland?

Nah, I grown my own.

Mathijs

Maggots ate'em?
The wig-thing is a bad trip, mate.

But Keef soon gotta let his thinnin' come out of the closet, thats fer sure.

I think it's very possible that ROnnie has a wig, but I don't think Mick has one, based on pictures.
Mick did use other forms of extras 30 years ago, I really don't mind, if they play well - that's the main part, and of course I wouldn't know about last night as I weren't there



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-06-07 00:43 by Erik_Snow.

That's no wig for sure.


And I don't think that's one either?

I'm not a wig expert. But those don't look like wigs to me...
What concerns me more is Keith's playing

With these fingers we should be glad he can manage to play at all.

What we basically deal with here is a thing called
"ageing"; and I assure ya lads here around 30 or even younger...
It's gonna cross yer way too!

"one way or another, its gonna get ya.... "

I must agree with Mathijs again ( wha't the matter.... with me boy) first thing that game up we me was is that Keith or Garry.

I love the Stones you know .......

__________________________

Pathetic old bunch then? What is it with ya people ?

Baboon Bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pathetic old bunch then? What is it with ya people
> ?


what has wigs has to do with pathetic ? I'd wear a wig if I was in the spotlight

Anyone can come and see my hair. I will be 44 and
I have till this day not seen any grey or white in my hair.
I say you envy these guys. Noone ever complains at Charlie,
who a-greyed at thoirty. Like that's the only acceptable way.

Ronnie Wood doesnt have a wig. No @#$%& way.

you mean that hair of yours is actually REAL?

Yes I envy their hair, I'm younger than them and I'm allready grey and blue

no wigs but plenty of dye for sure

Here is Pagey "au natreul"

Much classier than dye job/wig IMO

Yeah - now we know the real deal - pure & unblended envy
NO, Gaz, thazza wig

Classic Baboon Shot

Mathijs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, I didn't see them live at Werchter, nor did
> I hear anything, but I saw some pictures,
> and...doesn't it start to look a bit, uhm,
> rediculous? Pathetic even maybe? I mean, Ronnie,
> Mick and Keith all dressed up in wigs and shiny
> jackets..it's not very rock and roll anymore is
> it? Charlie looks o.k., he looks his age, but the
> rest look a bit like dressed up clowns to me...
>
> Mathijs
> ps Ronnie: that wig is AWFULL!

<<< I mean, Ronnie, Mick and Keith all dressed up in wigs and shiny jackets ..it's not very rock and roll anymore is it?

Firstly, they're not wearing wigs, they're just being a bit over-zealous with the bottles of dye, and secondly ... the shiny jackets are actually VERY rock n' roll and are perfectly OK with me.

jabhead Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here is Pagey "au natreul"
>
> Much classier than dye job/wig IMO
>
> [i26.photobucket.com]
> /pagey07.jpg


Wow

when did he start doing this? Is this recent? Is this how he looks now? I'm surprised....

jabhead Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here is Pagey "au natreul"
>
> Much classier than dye job/wig IMO
>
> [i26.photobucket.com]
> /pagey07.jpg

Here's Plant with son Logan and Plant's less classy, one presumes, red-ish color intact...

[www.afropop.org]

I've never seen Plant wearing that hat before....or with such dark hair

Its water combed.
Another: [k43.pbase.com]

Plant@Polar Music Awards, lady@his side & wig on [www.fastnews.se]

it's true, ron wears a wig.

lame post. Who bloody cares.

Keith's balding patch has clearly been covered over with a weave/hairpiece,
in the Werchter photos
- and Mick looks to have had a very successful appointment with a bottle
of hair-dye.

...however,they look good on it-
so i don't have a problem with the hair treatments
i'm less keen on the Vegas-style glittery jackets/shirts.

..it's not very Dartford.

I have always respected Mathijs’ opinions ’cause he’s very knowledgeable and frank when it comes to musicianship and music in general.
There for I’m surprised to read this thread. I thought focusing on wigs and shiny jackets would definitely be beneath your dignity, Mathijs.
The Rolling Stones have been your heroes, why torture yourself with this kind of posts?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-06-07 19:23 by Thommie.