Tell Me :
Talk
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
RocksOff!
()
Date: January 12, 2007 04:21
Please be sincerely , it will look coward to see that the stones won on a stones board,so, please invite friends to write here
The Stones will be the BIGGEST band on world , Beatles are fags and ''putos'' (gay in spanish)
The stones are rough guys , the Beatles are Mother's Little Helpers
ok , this is my opinion , please write your opinions here
Luis from Mexico
''Let's Do Some Living , Before We Die''
The Stones will be the BIGGEST band on world , Beatles are fags and ''putos'' (gay in spanish)
The stones are rough guys , the Beatles are Mother's Little Helpers
ok , this is my opinion , please write your opinions here
Luis from Mexico
''Let's Do Some Living , Before We Die''
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Koen
()
Date: January 12, 2007 04:26
The Who is better 
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 04:26 by Koen.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 04:26 by Koen.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
ryanpow
()
Date: January 12, 2007 04:41
I think you should go back into the hole your crawled out of...
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
stoned_in_dc
()
Date: January 12, 2007 04:43
"better" is such a stupid word...
just like "winning"...
the stones are a great band...i just got the rolling stones now lp ffrr label..sounds great!
just like "winning"...
the stones are a great band...i just got the rolling stones now lp ffrr label..sounds great!
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
whitem8
()
Date: January 12, 2007 05:02
Jezz,
They are both great for different reasons....
Your homophobic machismo posturing is so tiresome and stereotypical...
They are both great for different reasons....
Your homophobic machismo posturing is so tiresome and stereotypical...
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Jumpin'JackFrash
()
Date: January 12, 2007 05:04
This question, if asked on a Rolling Stones fan board, causes a self-destruct sequence to initiate.
I would advise the editors of IORR to halt the sequence before a hole in the space-time continuum is ripped, and existence as we know it, is destroyed.
I would advise the editors of IORR to halt the sequence before a hole in the space-time continuum is ripped, and existence as we know it, is destroyed.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
soundcheck
()
Date: January 12, 2007 06:10
...... quick, , finish the 700 mile fence and gun towers.............
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 06:59 by soundcheck.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 06:59 by soundcheck.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
cirrhosis
()
Date: January 12, 2007 06:12
-
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-12-29 08:56 by cirrhosis.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-12-29 08:56 by cirrhosis.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
bigbang
()
Date: January 12, 2007 06:18
ryanpow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think you should go back into the hole your
> crawled out of...
I agree with you on that.... Offensive.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think you should go back into the hole your
> crawled out of...
I agree with you on that.... Offensive.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Beelyboy
()
Date: January 12, 2007 06:26
**edit:
in the interest of sensitivity after reading below post, i am removing my carefully worked out stones/beatle individual puto ratings: (sigh...)
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 07:06 by Beelyboy.
in the interest of sensitivity after reading below post, i am removing my carefully worked out stones/beatle individual puto ratings: (sigh...)
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 07:06 by Beelyboy.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
jumpinjackgreg
()
Date: January 12, 2007 06:50
I like the Stones better, but calling the Beatles "fags" and "putos" is incredibly offensive, immature, and in my opinion, grounds for getting the hell out of here. I can almost say that I know for a fact that none of the Stones would use words like that, nor the Beatles. It's just as bad as the "N" word.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Beelyboy
()
Date: January 12, 2007 07:02
"...I remember you in Hemlock Road in nineteen fifty-six.
You're a faggy little leather boy with a smaller piece of stick.
You're a lashing, smashing hunk of man;
Your sweat shines sweet and strong.
Your organs working perfectly, but there's a part that's not screwed on..."
m. jagger
memo from turner
You're a faggy little leather boy with a smaller piece of stick.
You're a lashing, smashing hunk of man;
Your sweat shines sweet and strong.
Your organs working perfectly, but there's a part that's not screwed on..."
m. jagger
memo from turner
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
loog droog
()
Date: January 12, 2007 07:08
jumpinjackgreg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like the Stones better, but calling the Beatles
> "fags" and "putos" is incredibly offensive,
> immature, and in my opinion, grounds for getting
> the hell out of here. I can almost say that I know
> for a fact that none of the Stones would use words
> like that, nor the Beatles.
Ever read "Lennon Remembers", the book that reprinted John Lennon's 1970 Rolling Stone interview? When John talks about the Stones he says he doesn't care much for Mick's "fag dancing."
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like the Stones better, but calling the Beatles
> "fags" and "putos" is incredibly offensive,
> immature, and in my opinion, grounds for getting
> the hell out of here. I can almost say that I know
> for a fact that none of the Stones would use words
> like that, nor the Beatles.
Ever read "Lennon Remembers", the book that reprinted John Lennon's 1970 Rolling Stone interview? When John talks about the Stones he says he doesn't care much for Mick's "fag dancing."
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
stonesfrk
()
Date: January 12, 2007 07:48
stoned_in_dc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "better" is such a stupid word...
>
> just like "winning"...
>
>
> the stones are a great band...i just got the
> rolling stones now lp ffrr label..sounds great!
At least the Stones are Winning Ugly!
-------------------------------------------------------
> "better" is such a stupid word...
>
> just like "winning"...
>
>
> the stones are a great band...i just got the
> rolling stones now lp ffrr label..sounds great!
At least the Stones are Winning Ugly!
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
jamesjagger
()
Date: January 12, 2007 10:17
I do prefer Burger King!
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Svartmer
()
Date: January 12, 2007 10:32
What a brilliant thread! Innovative! I´m really impressed, keep working on the good ideas, we really need them...
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: January 12, 2007 10:34
I bought Beatles-singles back there in 1964, but when I heard 'Little Red Rooster' with Stones that stopped.
2 1 2 0
2 1 2 0
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
schillid
()
Date: January 12, 2007 14:56
Addams Family or Munsters ?
Ginger or Marianne ?
Chocolate or Vanilla ?
Squares or triangles ?
Ginger or Marianne ?
Chocolate or Vanilla ?
Squares or triangles ?
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
JumpingKentFlash
()
Date: January 12, 2007 15:03
Addams Family
Ginger
Chocolate
Triangles
To set the record straight.
JumpingKentFlash
Ginger
Chocolate
Triangles
To set the record straight.
JumpingKentFlash
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
rlngstns
()
Date: January 12, 2007 15:05
i am
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
keefstheman
()
Date: January 12, 2007 15:11
since the beatles don't exist anymore, it must be the stones...
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
reg thorpe
()
Date: January 12, 2007 15:14
the stones were better musicians...beatles better songwriters
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: January 12, 2007 16:53
Beatles was very tight...I think they were the better musicians and songwriters...but Stones had a style that was cooler...
2 1 2 0
2 1 2 0
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
jamesfdouglas
()
Date: January 12, 2007 16:56
The Beatles.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
schillid
()
Date: January 12, 2007 16:58
The Stones
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
jamesfdouglas
()
Date: January 12, 2007 17:00
Okay, you win. The Stones.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 17:01 by jamesfdouglas.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 17:01 by jamesfdouglas.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
schillid
()
Date: January 12, 2007 17:02
cool
my bag anyway
my bag anyway
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Elmo Lewis
()
Date: January 12, 2007 17:08
Am I in a time warp? Is this 1965?
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Chav Watch
()
Date: January 12, 2007 20:43
The Beatles - without doubt. Stupid question.
Re: Who is better , The Stones or The Beatles??
Posted by:
Erik_Snow
()
Date: January 12, 2007 20:46
Who's on first base ?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 20:47 by Erik_Snow.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-12 20:47 by Erik_Snow.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Guests:
2109
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10