well if that were the case keith and ronnie would still do the backing vocals
like a real rock band does instead of hiding behind singers , brass and keyboards,
its a disgrace, it has become chuck and his rolling stones

I don't they'll play again past 2007. See 'em while and where you can.

Nikolai Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't they'll play again past 2007. See 'em
> while and where you can.

Oh yes they will play shows in 2007. Definitely.

Bjorn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Charlie and Mick work hard as hell. The other two will never grow up.
>
> Neither will some of you, obviously.
>

Oh my God, I'd overlooked that completely .... the need to grow up that is. I'll get onto it right away .......

Repeat after me ...

MUST GROW UP
...
MUST GROW UP
MUST GROW UP

How'm I doing ? Oh shit, still a child ....

MUST GROW UP
...
MUST GROW UP

Aaaaagh shite ... bloody hell I feel terrible. Must be all this growing up I've been doing ?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-09-03 02:34 by bv.

If you remember in the interviews from 25X5, Charlie even says "every time we finish a world tour, I say 'no @#$%& more' and I quit the band." So this is not unusual.

Got a feeling that this time he (Charlie) means it.

maybe - but it wont be in December 2006.

This is for those you who speaks Scandinavian:

[www.bt.no]

If you can translate ...would you be kind enough to do so for us?

undertheradar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can translate ...would you be kind enough
> to do so for us?

I had some Scandinavian lessons:

"Utter Bullshit

This story is utter bullshit. Tabloids.. boring! We @#$%& our grandma's in the bottom."
I think that was it.

It basically says nothing, as it is picking up a rumour of a rumour of a rumor of Charlie not touring anymore, so they make a story out of nothing.

Bjornulf

Ok....no probs, that story again!

I thought they had a real quarrell..like who's going to do the washing up :-)

bv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It basically says nothing, as it is picking up a
> rumour of a rumour of a rumor of Charlie not
> touring anymore, so they make a story out of
> nothing.

Thank you BV

bv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It basically says nothing, as it is picking up a
> rumour of a rumour of a rumor of Charlie not
> touring anymore, so they make a story out of
> nothing.



Well, that shows that tabloids are tabloids wherever you are.

In about 3 weeks, it will appear in some US publication.

BV: How firm are the 2007 rumours and what about India, Thailand, Hawaii and South America in December?

bv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It basically says nothing, as it is picking up a
> rumour of a rumour of a rumor of Charlie not
> touring anymore, so they make a story out of
> nothing.

Hope you are right because the stones without Charlie are NOT the Stones. Period.

dont worry they wont tour without him

BT has to fill up like 5-10 pages of Stones in their newspaper so no wonder they make any story they can. Rest assured BT is as far away from the sources as you can get. Who do you trust the most? BT or IORR? There will be a tour next summer in Europe. If they are still around and kicking that is - which we all hope and assume of course. Nobody have a guarantee they will wake up next morning or next year, remember... And... You ain't dead until it is declared by an official.

Bjornulf

BV never tries to mislead anyone over possible 'Stones' touring movements.
Undoubtably the information provided by BV is the most accurate possible before an official announcemount takes place.
If all goes well health wise with the skinny english cats i also am looking forward to seeing them in Europe in 2007.
Lets all hope that it all comes together to make it happen as 'Time Waits for No One and it Won't Wait for Me'.

please tell me. why can't you accept they will stop soon ? i love the Stones to bits (obviously) but their impending end doesn't bother me. why should it ? they've done their stint

ffs they've been around long enough!

let them go gracefully please

.... some of ya think that all the people in the stones have nothing better to do on this planet than play the same songs every three four days, every month of every dam year... geezz, would you want to do that unless you were gettin tons of money, and even that gets old,,
, and duh, people are gettin sick of seeing the same show thats basically been goin' on for years now and that the show really isnt very good if you break it down..
granted, there not completely embarrassing themselves, but if you back away and really look, there hangin on... look at the layout, the conservatism (cause they cant learn older songs well enough, they dont even know how to play bigger bang yet).. the massive stage help, ya dont think there not all covering up for them do ya.. and take a hear at the musicianship, let alone the shape a couple of the members are in... . etc etc... someone else take over now...

Thank you for telling me this 'Soundcheck'.


My God - I hadn't realised this - I must be really stupid.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-09-03 05:42 by turd.

From now on - I'm going to be a fan of............'SpongeBob' (and Patrick).

I am really tired of all the complainers and whiners on this board about the Stones, especially about the set lists, the greed, when they are going to hang it up, much more.

I love the Stones

I love the stadium shows as they add great theatrics (I also think their current light/ing show is the best ever)

I love the arena shows

I would love to see a club show

I enjoy most all the set lists, some more than others, and sure I would like to see them do a wider variety of both old and new songs, but I don't hate and abandon them for it

The possibility of retirement disturbs me, but I don't obsess on it

I think Ronnie's playing on this tour has been very good (perhaps his best ever), especially some of the solos (i.e. Sway at Twickenham I)

I think Mick Taylor was great, perhaps better technically than Ronnie (as Ronnie has said) but why go into a frenzy over this when he has been gone for a while (and don't forget when Ronnie first played with them how the other Stones said he gave them new life or new energy with his personality and this is perhaps still true)

I do have some standing to make these statements as, though not as much as some of you, I have seen them 30 times since 1975 and have been a big fan since 1971.

Anyway, I can add to this, but maybe later.

Now tear me apart. I will respond if I feel like it.

tim from montana (originally from California)

he always says that.

this will be their last large world wide tour IMO. i hope that they have the sense to put out CD's of unreleased material periodically.

Forget it, Mate...these guys will outlast us all...

JR

Midnight Toker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> this will be their last large world wide tour IMO.
> i hope that they have the sense to put out CD's of
> unreleased material periodically.


Maybe your last..time you..want to go.

The Worst. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nikolai Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I don't they'll play again past 2007. See 'em
> > while and where you can.
>
> Oh yes they will play shows in 2007. Definitely.


Yes they will, The Worst! And we'll deliver the BEST furniture... I think we're on. They were very satisfied. So don't make any silly plans for next summer, except going on tour with the Stones... I'll mail you some mor photos!

soundcheck Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .... some of ya think that all the people in the
> stones have nothing better to do on this planet
> than play the same songs every three four days,
> every month of every dam year... geezz, would you
> want to do that unless you were gettin tons of
> money, and even that gets old,,
> , and duh, people are gettin sick of seeing
> the same show thats basically been goin' on for
> years now and that the show really isnt very good
> if you break it down..
> granted, there not completely embarrassing
> themselves, but if you back away and really look,
> there hangin on... look at the layout, the
> conservatism (cause they cant learn older songs
> well enough, they dont even know how to play
> bigger bang yet).. the massive stage help, ya dont
> think there not all covering up for them do ya..
> and take a hear at the musicianship, let alone the
> shape a couple of the members are in... . etc
> etc... someone else take over now...


You! Get the @#$%& out of here!!!!