Personally, I think they are too lazy to revamp the setlist. That's why they have become a nostalgia band. I'm sure they could play(JJF,HTW,SFTD,SMU,BS,IORR,MU,IORR,TD,YCAGWYW,Satisfaction,Bitch,ADTL,Angie, WH) to name a few in their sleep without any rehearsal. That basically leaves them with 12 songs to actually rehearse.

I think they forget it's their "senior fans" who made them what they are.

The Milan setlist was GREAT and that's that!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-07-13 12:17 by Niklas.

Lazy? The Stones..... name another band after 40 odd years staging a tour this big?? + a new album, biggests gig in Rio, Superbowl........

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lazy? The Stones..... name another band after 40
> odd years staging a tour this big?? + a new album,
> biggests gig in Rio, Superbowl........


Sam Spade is referring to what he considers, a lazy setlist-
which is a different interpretation to your understanding of lazy.

I don't think the Milan setlist was lazy- a full 2 hour show, with a good mix of ballads, and rockers- even an Italian language version of a classic song.
-Hope the momentum is kept up for the rest of the tour.

johang Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Swedish paper Aftonbladet states "A coward of
> a show" "Do we have to listen to Satisfaction one
> more time?". For a change I agree with the
> critics.


Hmmm. Maybe the Swedes are angry that their show got cancelled? Hmmm. That must be it. Horsens Folkeblad is overstatic, and says that the opening night was a true victory.

JumpingKentFlash

johang Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Swedish paper Aftonbladet states "A coward of a show" "Do we have to listen to Satisfaction one more time?". For a change I agree with the critics.


While the other major Swedish newspaper Expressen gave them 4 out 5, saying it was magic...

well a South Korean newspaper said NOTHING about it, not even knowing it happened! so there!