Re: stones 1995 vs cream 2005
Date: January 10, 2006 11:24
RankOutsider Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cream had one hit, 'Sunshine Of Your Love'
So? Led Zeppelin didn't have any hits at all.
Still sold more records than the Stones, though.
Look at what they produced,it was good but does it compare to what The Stones
have done? Not Even, not even close.
A matter of opinion, of course, but they were only around for 3 years!
> I've only heard a few of the songs from RAH
Maybe you should hear a few more?
Watching a gig on TV is just a pale shadow of actually attending, I mean, seeing a Stones DVD is hardly as good as being there, is it?
> And if you want to talk about money, that's the
> ONLY reason Cream got back together, period.
Totally disagree. Clapton certainly doesn't need the money. No doubt they will get a good screw out of the DVD sales, but they could have really milked it with a tour, if they wanted....and done it a few years beforehand. 37 years between gigs, and money was the ONLY reason they got back together? For 7 gigs?
And if anyone thinks that's the ONLY reason The Stones
are still here you're out of your mind.
With you on that one...but it's still cost me more to see them at Wembley Stadium than it cost to see Cream from about 50 ft. away at the Albert Hall.
> The Stones have 'always' been a better live 'act'
> then Cream, and, they always will be, I don't care
> how many times Cream gets back together.
Again, a matter of opinion, but Jagger's always been one for flashy showmanship, big stage sets with lots of props, loads of redundant extra musicians on stage. Cream were formed for the musical aspirations, not so concerned with putting on a show. So it's hardly surprising that they draw a bigger crowd.
Rant over!
Lee