Editorial reviews
5 stars out of 5 - What makes A BIGGER BANG so terrific is the Stones turning the clock back to the raw bravado of their prime and partying like it's 1972.
Uncut

4.5 out of 5 stars - ...A BIGGER BANG is just a straight-up, damn fine Rolling Stones albums, with no qualifiers or apologies necessary...
Rolling Stone

3 stars out of 5 - [A]rguably their most satisfying work since 1978's SOME GIRLS....[With] more spontaneous-sounding numbers that thrive on Charlie's authoritative tub-thumping and Keith and Ronnie's raucous, dovetailing guitars.
Mojo

"4.5 out of 5 stars - ...A BIGGER BANG is just a straight-up, damn fine Rolling Stones albums, with no qualifiers or apologies necessary...
Rolling Stone "

Gotta agree there, although I think I'd give it a 4 instead of 4.5

I give it a 4 out of 5.

One way I can tell it's good is that it feels shorter to me than SW, VL & B2B even though it is actually longer. When ABB hits Infamy I still want more as opposed to those others where I'm ready for them to be done by the last 3 or 4 songs or else I just skip through for the few I like.

Mojo should shut the @#$%& up! All this crap about "best work since Some Girls". Forget about the past already! You can't compare them. I'd be more likely to put on A Bigger Bang but if I'd make a top 10 of Stones albums Some Girls would end up allot higher. Just rate the music!