For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
crawdaddy
Hope you have seen this Keith.
The Rolling Stones are even famous on Mars.
Quote
Lynd8
is it worth 2 Billion dollars to find out? We have kids not getting enough food in many states, infrastructure is falling apart everywhere. I grew up in the 60s and was fascinated by our landing on the moon and very proud of our country and accomplishments, but we have much bigger problems right now then determining what the hell is going on at Mars.
Quote
bitusa2012Quote
georgie48
With water found on Mars, it would be very strange if there would not be (would not have been) any life on it.
THIS is what I don’t get about our search for other life in the universe. Much as the old UFO that Will Smith used in Independence Day to infect the bad extraterrestrial mother ship with a virus by way of a computer and inbuilt USB port (IN the UFO - who would have thought an ancient UFO would have a USB port?) we seem to assume life on other planets would need water. OUR life does of course, but water may (MAY) be lethal to other forms of life in the universe. “They” may (MAY) thrive on, radioactivity or a form of material WE don’t even know about. It might not require water at all. Our assumption of other life needs our “life” giving source may be entirely wrong.
Quote
TorresQuote
Lynd8
is it worth 2 Billion dollars to find out? We have kids not getting enough food in many states, infrastructure is falling apart everywhere. I grew up in the 60s and was fascinated by our landing on the moon and very proud of our country and accomplishments, but we have much bigger problems right now then determining what the hell is going on at Mars.
I think it's worth a lot more, actually I think it's one of the best ways to invest money, in technology that will help our future generations move ahead with their lives and dreams. I am absolutely convinced once the pandemics is past, global warming and sustainability of our Planet will be the No.1 global concern. Humanity will eventually be forced to turn to space, somewhere in the future.
And if the 2 billion were not spent here, your much bigger problems wouldn't be solved anyway.
Quote
TIRED
Aren't there enough real problems on our home planet that could be fixed instead - with the same brains and the same funds?
Quote
IrixQuote
TIRED
Aren't there enough real problems on our home planet that could be fixed instead - with the same brains and the same funds?
Yep: tell the 1/3 of the world's population who do not have access to safe drinking water that science has found water on Mars instead - [www.WHO.int] . Nothing wrong with science but there're currently more urgent issues on Earth for the mankind than on Mars. Some say as excuse: 'science on Mars and solving issues on Earth can run parallel' - yes, but sometimes my impression is that they're more interested in Mars than on Earth. And if the mankind colonizes Mars (or a different Planet) then I afraid regarding negative things like e.g. war or crime that they won't be better there ....
Quote
Quote
bitusa2012
Quote
georgie48
With water found on Mars, it would be very strange if there would not be (would not have been) any life on it.
THIS is what I don’t get about our search for other life in the universe. Much as the old UFO that Will Smith used in Independence Day to infect the bad extraterrestrial mother ship with a virus by way of a computer and inbuilt USB port (IN the UFO - who would have thought an ancient UFO would have a USB port?) we seem to assume life on other planets would need water. OUR life does of course, but water may (MAY) be lethal to other forms of life in the universe. “They” may (MAY) thrive on, radioactivity or a form of material WE don’t even know about. It might not require water at all. Our assumption of other life needs our “life” giving source may be entirely wrong.
Quote
Re: O.T. Has there been life on Mars? new
Posted by: Torres ()
Date: February 20, 2021 18:57
Quote
Lynd8
is it worth 2 Billion dollars to find out? We have kids not getting enough food in many states, infrastructure is falling apart everywhere. I grew up in the 60s and was fascinated by our landing on the moon and very proud of our country and accomplishments, but we have much bigger problems right now then determining what the hell is going on at Mars.
I think it's worth a lot more, actually I think it's one of the best ways to invest money, in technology that will help our future generations move ahead with their lives and dreams. I am absolutely convinced once the pandemics is past, global warming and sustainability of our Planet will be the No.1 global concern. Humanity will eventually be forced to turn to space, somewhere in the future.
And if the 2 billion were not spent here, your much bigger problems wouldn't be solved anyway.
Quote
ProfessorWolf
europa be great but you'd have to drill through miles of ice to access the oceans plus you'd have to deal with the tremendous amount of radiation that juptier produces which can be hard to shield electronics from
titan would also be great for a colony because it has atmospheric presure similar to earths which means you could walk on its surface with basicly what people in antartica wear plus a source of oxygen and for the same reason a colony could be made inside an inflatable dome
and there is little wind or storms due to the lack of energy from the sun
and on top of that lets talk about resorces titan is basicly covered in petrolium and natural gas, has mountains made of water ice, & the organic matter its covered in can be made into fertilizer
now i know why colonize titan its cold and really far away
well one good reason is helium-3 its rare on earth and is necessary for nuclear fussion which is the only reasonable source of energy for near light speed ships that would be necsscary for interstellar travel and saturns atmosphere is full of it
it could be harvested and processed on titan and then sent to earth on robot ships
plus when the sun expand in a few billion years titan and saturn will be spared so a independent colony would great for the coutinuation of humanity
also as stones fans we should all know this mick explains it in great detail in 2000 light years if you listen closely
Quote
crawdaddy
Hopefully we will get some videos coming back from Mars fairly soon and when the drone/helicopter thingy gets up there will more to come.
Quote
ProfessorWolfQuote
Quote
bitusa2012
Quote
georgie48
With water found on Mars, it would be very strange if there would not be (would not have been) any life on it.
THIS is what I don’t get about our search for other life in the universe. Much as the old UFO that Will Smith used in Independence Day to infect the bad extraterrestrial mother ship with a virus by way of a computer and inbuilt USB port (IN the UFO - who would have thought an ancient UFO would have a USB port?) we seem to assume life on other planets would need water. OUR life does of course, but water may (MAY) be lethal to other forms of life in the universe. “They” may (MAY) thrive on, radioactivity or a form of material WE don’t even know about. It might not require water at all. Our assumption of other life needs our “life” giving source may be entirely wrong.
true life based on silcone or high energy plasma could and probaly does exist but the conditions for it to arise would be pretty rare however carbon based life (like us) would most likely be much more common according to most experts and such life would need water and such life arising on a planetary surface would still be subject to the same phsysical laws as us and would evolve into familiar forms in other words legs, fins, or wings to move, eyes to see and percieve the world, and some sort of brain or brains to control and recieve information from said eyes & legs
but that being said i would love to be suprisedQuote
Re: O.T. Has there been life on Mars? new
Posted by: Torres ()
Date: February 20, 2021 18:57
Quote
Lynd8
is it worth 2 Billion dollars to find out? We have kids not getting enough food in many states, infrastructure is falling apart everywhere. I grew up in the 60s and was fascinated by our landing on the moon and very proud of our country and accomplishments, but we have much bigger problems right now then determining what the hell is going on at Mars.
I think it's worth a lot more, actually I think it's one of the best ways to invest money, in technology that will help our future generations move ahead with their lives and dreams. I am absolutely convinced once the pandemics is past, global warming and sustainability of our Planet will be the No.1 global concern. Humanity will eventually be forced to turn to space, somewhere in the future.
And if the 2 billion were not spent here, your much bigger problems wouldn't be solved anyway.
i would like to point out that the space race led to (directly or indirectly) the developmet of the technolgy that gave us our modern world namely the computers where typing on and the internet we are connected to and that same technology has improved peoples live all around the world most notably those in the most need even when you consider the terrifying side of that technology
a return to that sort of mission for our species may lead to innovation to help the world now and help fix our current round of problems
also if where looking to cut wasteful spending out of our society i don't think nasa should be anywhere near first to the chopping block
i mean how much does the rock get paid flex and and look cool on screen (no offense mr. rock love you and the new show) or do networks spend making stupid reality shows where hollow useless fake people prance around and pretend to emote in ridiculous situations so they can find fake love with other hollow useless fake people
i would much rather see 20 billion a year go to explore our universe for the benifit of the collective whole then this nonsense
Quote
Re: O.T. Has there been life on Mars? new
Posted by: stickyfingers101 ()
Date: February 22, 2021 17:23
Quote
ProfessorWolf
Quote
Quote
bitusa2012
Quote
georgie48
With water found on Mars, it would be very strange if there would not be (would not have been) any life on it.
THIS is what I don’t get about our search for other life in the universe. Much as the old UFO that Will Smith used in Independence Day to infect the bad extraterrestrial mother ship with a virus by way of a computer and inbuilt USB port (IN the UFO - who would have thought an ancient UFO would have a USB port?) we seem to assume life on other planets would need water. OUR life does of course, but water may (MAY) be lethal to other forms of life in the universe. “They” may (MAY) thrive on, radioactivity or a form of material WE don’t even know about. It might not require water at all. Our assumption of other life needs our “life” giving source may be entirely wrong.
true life based on silcone or high energy plasma could and probaly does exist but the conditions for it to arise would be pretty rare however carbon based life (like us) would most likely be much more common according to most experts and such life would need water and such life arising on a planetary surface would still be subject to the same phsysical laws as us and would evolve into familiar forms in other words legs, fins, or wings to move, eyes to see and percieve the world, and some sort of brain or brains to control and recieve information from said eyes & legs
but that being said i would love to be suprised
Quote
Re: O.T. Has there been life on Mars? new
Posted by: Torres ()
Date: February 20, 2021 18:57
Quote
Lynd8
is it worth 2 Billion dollars to find out? We have kids not getting enough food in many states, infrastructure is falling apart everywhere. I grew up in the 60s and was fascinated by our landing on the moon and very proud of our country and accomplishments, but we have much bigger problems right now then determining what the hell is going on at Mars.
I think it's worth a lot more, actually I think it's one of the best ways to invest money, in technology that will help our future generations move ahead with their lives and dreams. I am absolutely convinced once the pandemics is past, global warming and sustainability of our Planet will be the No.1 global concern. Humanity will eventually be forced to turn to space, somewhere in the future.
And if the 2 billion were not spent here, your much bigger problems wouldn't be solved anyway.
i would like to point out that the space race led to (directly or indirectly) the developmet of the technolgy that gave us our modern world namely the computers where typing on and the internet we are connected to and that same technology has improved peoples live all around the world most notably those in the most need even when you consider the terrifying side of that technology
a return to that sort of mission for our species may lead to innovation to help the world now and help fix our current round of problems
also if where looking to cut wasteful spending out of our society i don't think nasa should be anywhere near first to the chopping block
i mean how much does the rock get paid flex and and look cool on screen (no offense mr. rock love you and the new show) or do networks spend making stupid reality shows where hollow useless fake people prance around and pretend to emote in ridiculous situations so they can find fake love with other hollow useless fake people
i would much rather see 20 billion a year go to explore our universe for the benifit of the collective whole then this nonsense
The Rock's TV program and/or Reality TV isn't funded by tax-dollars...big difference