For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
24FPS
The real question is WHO WOULD CARE ABOUT A NEW LIVE ALBUM? By who, the Stones? Live Albums used to be special, and the first chance to hear your favorite group in a different setting. Maybe the songs sounded a little different, a little sped up. There's no one out there now with a catalogue of music begging to be heard live. What? You want Taylor Swift LIVE!
With the advent of the DVD as a music delivery device, most groups are now on film/video doing all their hits. And if their lucky they actually have some archival films to sell, like the Stones. And archival is about all there is demand for. I don't want to see the Allman Brothers circa 2014, but I sure as well want to see the film of them Live At The Fillmore East FINALLY on DVD. Or Bowie at the Tower in 1974 was secretly filmed.
Quote
HearMeKnockin
So it's all going digital? Time to learn to hack...
Aww, thanks Turner.Quote
Turner68Yes. I'll send you a memo.Quote
HearMeKnockin
So it's all going digital? Time to learn to hack...
Quote
Turner68Quote
24FPS
The real question is WHO WOULD CARE ABOUT A NEW LIVE ALBUM? By who, the Stones? Live Albums used to be special, and the first chance to hear your favorite group in a different setting. Maybe the songs sounded a little different, a little sped up. There's no one out there now with a catalogue of music begging to be heard live. What? You want Taylor Swift LIVE!
With the advent of the DVD as a music delivery device, most groups are now on film/video doing all their hits. And if their lucky they actually have some archival films to sell, like the Stones. And archival is about all there is demand for. I don't want to see the Allman Brothers circa 2014, but I sure as well want to see the film of them Live At The Fillmore East FINALLY on DVD. Or Bowie at the Tower in 1974 was secretly filmed.
breaking news: DVDs are pretty much defunct. there was a 28% drop in sales last year of DVDs. this year more money will be spent streaming movies than on DVD. in 2016 DVDs will be as dead as VHS.
Quote
24FPSQuote
Turner68Quote
24FPS
The real question is WHO WOULD CARE ABOUT A NEW LIVE ALBUM? By who, the Stones? Live Albums used to be special, and the first chance to hear your favorite group in a different setting. Maybe the songs sounded a little different, a little sped up. There's no one out there now with a catalogue of music begging to be heard live. What? You want Taylor Swift LIVE!
With the advent of the DVD as a music delivery device, most groups are now on film/video doing all their hits. And if their lucky they actually have some archival films to sell, like the Stones. And archival is about all there is demand for. I don't want to see the Allman Brothers circa 2014, but I sure as well want to see the film of them Live At The Fillmore East FINALLY on DVD. Or Bowie at the Tower in 1974 was secretly filmed.
breaking news: DVDs are pretty much defunct. there was a 28% drop in sales last year of DVDs. this year more money will be spent streaming movies than on DVD. in 2016 DVDs will be as dead as VHS.
So....I should turn in my new Hampton '81, L.A. Forum '75, and upcoming Marquee '71, and possibly Hyde Park '69 DVDs? My Blu Ray player rocks on Saturday night.
Quote
Turner68Quote
24FPSQuote
Turner68Quote
24FPS
The real question is WHO WOULD CARE ABOUT A NEW LIVE ALBUM? By who, the Stones? Live Albums used to be special, and the first chance to hear your favorite group in a different setting. Maybe the songs sounded a little different, a little sped up. There's no one out there now with a catalogue of music begging to be heard live. What? You want Taylor Swift LIVE!
With the advent of the DVD as a music delivery device, most groups are now on film/video doing all their hits. And if their lucky they actually have some archival films to sell, like the Stones. And archival is about all there is demand for. I don't want to see the Allman Brothers circa 2014, but I sure as well want to see the film of them Live At The Fillmore East FINALLY on DVD. Or Bowie at the Tower in 1974 was secretly filmed.
breaking news: DVDs are pretty much defunct. there was a 28% drop in sales last year of DVDs. this year more money will be spent streaming movies than on DVD. in 2016 DVDs will be as dead as VHS.
So....I should turn in my new Hampton '81, L.A. Forum '75, and upcoming Marquee '71, and possibly Hyde Park '69 DVDs? My Blu Ray player rocks on Saturday night.
Not at all - just saying that just as DVDs changed the game as you pointed out, the game is changing again.
Quote
Happy JackQuote
Tate
To the contrary, I think the "live album" is going through a sort of renaissance-like transformation. There has been a huge amount of live material released in recent years-- from the Stones, from Dylan, from loads of other bands... Live archives, new live material, and yes, there are those bands out there releasing every show. Dylan's bootleg series is absolutely brilliant, and the '75 set from that series is one of the best "live albums" I have ever heard. I think what we will be seeing less and less of is the live album that has been tinkered with, overdubs and extra crowd noise, etc, and more performances with blemishes intact. That is not to say the Rolling Stones will not tinker with future live releases, especially those that are from recent tours, but the live recordings we're getting these days are pretty fantastic. The Dead has an 80-disc/ 30-show retrospective coming in Sept! Soon the Stones will have nearly enough official material to assemble a show-from-each-tour box set... and I don't think that is a bad thing. Change is good!
But these are all archival releases. The Stones aren't going to release a live album in the spirit of Ya-Ya's. The last Stones live album, IMO, that was like Ya-Ya's was No Security and that was because it focused on rarities rather than war horses which made a unique album. Again, NEW liver albums are not being released for the same reasons they once were.
Quote
GasLightStreet
There is a divide in the entire industry. It's called the 1980s, the latter part of the decade anyway, when some bands/artists started using studio recordings and their own samples to support the live show. Aerosmith is the most perfect example of that - to which they have done for years.
To get a live album from Janet Jackson or Taylor Swift or loads of other pop acts is hilarious. All the vocals for the concert are studio recordings already. So they wouldn't need to do overdubs...
As bad as some of the Stones' live albums have been they're almost necessary to have as a fan. FLASHPOINT is worth it for Start Me Up, regardless of the solo being an overdub, and Sad Sad Sad. The rest sucks and is necessary to listen to once in a while understand the band's timeline. LOVE YOU LIVE is just horrible - even entertaining at times, like Brown Sugar and JJF - and awesome: horrible is just about everything except Honky Tonk Women and side 3. STILL LIFE is excellent as is GYYYO! and now, fortunately, LIVE IN TEXAS. NO SECURITY is pretty good and LIVE LICKS is worth it only for disc 2.
Is the live album dead? I doubt it. People still buy old albums. Just because they didn't chart or sell X amount upon release doesn't mean there isn't interest.
Quote
Tate
No, I mentioned Flashpoint as the first album that was absent of that energy the pre-90's albums had. By pre-90's, I meant 'Got Live..', Ya Ya's, LYL, and Still Life.
Quote
tomcasagranda
80 CDs of The Grateful Dead coming out in September 2015, by Rhino. I'd say very much alive.
Quote
Stones50Quote
tomcasagranda
80 CDs of The Grateful Dead coming out in September 2015, by Rhino. I'd say very much alive.
Now THAT is frightening