Re: Andrew Loog Oldham as producer: Good , Bad, Or, Ugly?
Date: April 23, 2005 04:27
Boy, what a great question, RO.
I'm gonna have to think aobut this one before I comment more but...
Part of me says he deserves a great deal of credit for the way
they sounded in the studio (later, that is, as AOL says when they
first entered the studio to record, he had no idea what mixing was).
However, I'm not sure how involved he was in the actual studio process,
That is editing songs (repeat this riff there, use this instrument,
lose the chorus here, fade it here, good guitar sound, lousy guitar soud, etc...),
or did he leave most of that to the band and just function as manager and all the other things he was involved in at the time. I haven't read 2Stoned yet.
Does he comment on this? I do believe AOL doesn't get the credit he deserves
for making the Rolling Stones what they are. My wife says she was "afraid" of
the Stones for years when she was growing up, and that's due to AOL's master plan.
The press picked up on it and...BOOM. The Rolling Stones we all know.
Also, does anyone listen to AOL being a DJ on Sirrius satellite radio
on the weekends? He's on the garage band station. I don't know if he picks the songs, but he tells some great stories using that wonderful use of language that he has.