Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: KeithRichards ()
Date: February 18, 2005 11:10

Apologia pro The Sideman

By Scott Galupo
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

"Whaaaat?" Chuck Leavell, longtime keyboardist for the Rolling Stones, reacts to an astonishingly unartful edit on the Stones' most recent release, the concert tour souvenir "Live Licks."
The band is transitioning out of the slinky, half-time bridge of the song "Rocks Off." The rhythm goes wobbly and then " "Whaaaat?" " mix-man Bob Clearmountain sends at least 30 seconds of the original recording down a memory hole.

How could product like that, in this day and age of slick digital airbrushing, be rushed so carelessly out the door?
Such is the plight of the proverbial sideman: He's always the last to know.
Of course, there's the corollary silver lining: It's never his fault.
Mr. Leavell is the definitive sideman, having played piano and organ for the likes of the Allman Brothers, George Harrison and countless other artists over 30-plus years in the business. He landed, and has maintained, his role within the Stones by effortlessly amalgamating the styles of Stones piano men past " the boogie-woogie of founding member Ian Stewart, the melodicism of Nicky Hopkins and the bluesy gospel of Billy Preston.

His playing graces songs you've heard a hundred times " Eric Clapton's "Unplugged" version of "Layla," the Black Crowes' "She Talks to Angels," Train's "Drops of Jupiter" " without ever having given a second thought to their recording personnel.

Like the perfect White House speechwriter, the perfect sideman has a passion for anonymity.

"I've always just wanted to be a guy in the band," Mr. Leavell says. "I've never really wanted to be a leader. I've been forced into that position a few times in my career" " most notably with the critically appreciated but commercially luckless Sea Level " "but my preference is to work behind the artist, with the artist."

The face of rock music wouldn't look much different without sidemen such as Mr. Leavell, but it sure would sound a lot different. In the sideman business, "you have input," Mr. Leavell explains with a kindly Alabaman drawl, "but it's their record. It's their name."

Some of rock's most indelible moments are the work of sidemen, most of whom stay in the shadows, some of whom go on to achieve fame of their own. Sidemen have been around for as long as bands have been around; they're part of the warp and woof of modern popular music.

Jazz guitar pioneer Charlie Christian was a prodigy within the Benny Goodman stable. Funk bassist Bootsy Collins was stuck behind James Brown, a notorious credit-hogger, before George Clinton gave him a more prominent role in Parliament.
A key test of an indelible sideman contribution is this: You shouldn't be able to imagine a song without it.

Think of Al Kooper's Hammond B-3 organ on Bob Dylan's "Like a Rolling Stone." Listen to an early, waltz-like version of the song on Mr. Dylan's "Bootleg Series" boxed set; it sounds emasculated without Mr. Kooper's touch.
Think of every Chuck Berry song on which pianist Johnnie Johnson played.
What would Neil Young's "Southern Man" be without Nils Lofgren's chugging piano chords? The Beatles' "Get Back" without Mr. Preston's electric piano solo? John Lennon's "Jealous Guy" and the Who's "Getting in Tune" without Mr. Hopkins' gentle tunefulness? The Stones' "Brown Sugar" without Bobby Keys' wonderfully sloppy saxophone solo? Or Stevie Nicks' "Edge of Seventeen" without Waddy Wachtel's propulsive staccato guitar riff?

The great sideman pitch-ins should be so gigantic as to nearly warrant a co-compositional credit, as with Mr. Leavell's galloping piano solo on the Allman Brothers Band's instrumental hit "Jessica." Mr. Leavell recounts in his recently published memoir "Between Rock and Home Place" that Allman Brothers' singer-guitarist Dickey Betts once sent word through a mutual friend: "Tell Chuck that 'Jessica' is as much his song as mine."

(By the same token, a sideman who starts snagging partial writing credits " as, for example, legendary Stax house guitarist Steve Cropper did on classics such as Otis Redding's "(Sittin' On) The Dock of the Bay" and Wilson Pickett's "In the Midnight Hour" " passes beyond the status of true sideman into another category, populated by mixed types such as renowned blues composer and Chess session musician and producer Willie Dixon.)

Certain sidemen, read drummers, play parts that may not immediately pop out in high relief, but their stamps are singular nonetheless. Jim Keltner was the go-to drummer for artists such as Mr. Dylan, Ry Cooder and the Traveling Wilburys. Kenny Aronoff's drumming galvanized many of John Mellencamp's early hits.
The downside of being a sideman is manifold: less fame, less cash, less job security.

Mr. Leavell nearly gave up on music in the early-'80s, after the demise of Sea Level and all manner of difficulties with the Macon, Ga., label Capricorn Records. He briefly considered farming full time, as he and his wife had acquired a tree plantation outside Atlanta.

Then he got a call from the Stones camp; full-time farming could wait.
Is it possible that sidemen " with exposure to a variety of professional stimuli, but few of the personal hassles that come with celebrity " have more fun than rock stars themselves?

"Absolutely," Mr. Leavell says. "I've got no complaints. It's been a heck of a ride so far, and it ain't over yet."


Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Rorty ()
Date: February 18, 2005 13:40

Thanks KeithRichards for typing this!

Very interesting to read - not about just Leavell himself (I wonder if he is also referring to the Stones about being "forced" to take the leadership..), but about the role of sideman in general, and their contribution to the final output of songs (the examples are good also).

I mean, as we know, there are a lot of controversies around the Stones compositions, namely over of credition of Jagger-Richards material. At least Brian Jones, Bill Wyman, Mick Taylor, Ron Wood, Ry Cooder and Dr. John have publicly more or less complained about the Twins if not stealing their ideas but neglecting their role in the progress of songs. Maybe some of their whining is justified, some not - there does not seem to be exact borders or even rules to settle the issue - when you should be credited and when not. The Stones organisation seem to have a quite clear politics in this one.

The examples of Cropper (never heard that before) and Willie Dixon are from the the other end of the spectre. I read from Muddy Waters biography that there were some doubts and complaints of Dixon's way to take almost all the credits of the released songs around the time - other artists seem to be okay and didn't mind, others not - the point was that the origins of classical material released at the time were sort of "in the air", the main phrases (that mostly constituted the essence of those blues songs) were invented by almost anyone, and the songs around those phrases and themas were built as collaborations, but after hitting the studio, very disciplined and determinate Dixon was the master to take the songwriting credits (and the money). At least Muddy seemed to "suffer" this, but other guys, I think Howling Wolf was one, had a harder attitude against the rights of leading sideman in the Chess studio (Dixon) and didn't allow the credition so easily slip out of their hands.

- Doxa



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2005-02-18 13:51 by Rorty.

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: KSIE ()
Date: February 18, 2005 14:53

Interesting article. See Chuck ain't that bad, he's horrified about the Rocks Off edit! Thanks Lorenz, glad to see you're reading the Washington Times. Good rag.

I agree with you Doxa, he does pick out some good examples of sidemen who made large contributions. Al Kooper is the perfect example.

And Bootsy Collins!!

Your love is kinda sweet
Sweet enough to eat
I'm hooked on your chocolate stuff
I got the munchies for your love..

Ah Bootsy Baby!!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2005-02-18 15:31 by KSIE.

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Date: February 18, 2005 15:57

that was a good article. kinda surprised it was in the Washington Times. thouht it was a right wing paper, a 'balance' to the W. Post....

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 17:43

I thought the beginning of that article was a joke with the Rocks Off edit... Then I realized it wasn't. Wonders never cease!

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Milo Yammbag ()
Date: February 18, 2005 17:54

Maybe Chuck is not the annoying @#$%& that many of us (me included) feel that he is. He still plinks WAY too much during concerts.
Chuck should be allowed only so many plinks per show, which could be counted on the "Plink-O-Meter", which Keith unwittingly somehow created using a bong, a guitar string, a wristwatch and Crazy glue. Charlie was the one who realised the usefullness of Keiths gadget and named it.

Milo, NYC
Everythings' turning to gold

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 18:26

Hey, I'm plinking right now. Don't knock it.

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: MCDDTLC ()
Date: February 18, 2005 22:35

Hey G.W. - Let's PLINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MLC

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 22:43

Alright. I'm ready.

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: February 18, 2005 22:45

Honey I'm home...!!

ROCKMAN

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 22:47

My darling! I'm in the kitchen plinking!

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: February 18, 2005 22:55

Well ya can turn that thing off now

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 22:56

Can't you turn it off for me...

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:03

hang on keep it running while I lock the door........rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr....
davido and bassplayer followed me home again...cant we get them a blow up doll?

ROCKMAN

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:04

Oops... I sort of invited them to dinner. I thought tonight was the night you were going out with your mates.

And it is still going... I can't turn this thing off... rrrrrrrrrr... What will our guests think?

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: MCDDTLC ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:13

GW - your too much!!!! MLC

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:18

I am too much. Most men can't handle it. 'cept Rockie!!

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:21

I do like to have my clothes on for at least one hour a day though!!

ROCKIE

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:25

Yeah, but that's the ''foreplay hour'' anyway!

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:26

"SLAVE"....but I like it!

Rockie

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:27

Wouldn't have it any other way, come on!

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Cafaro ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:29

Yes, yes.....Boosty Collins..........Rag Popin'! Shine-o-mite!!

Re: Article about Chuck Leavell (he's horrified about the edit on Rocks Off)
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: February 18, 2005 23:30

Rag Popin'?!

Interesting term.



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1799
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home