For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Hairball
The Stones were lucky to have Mick Taylor in the band.
I saw the Bluesbreakers reunion with Mick Taylor in 1982 at the Roxy in L.A., and the sheer quality of his playing was breathtaking.
Quote
TheflyingDutchmanQuote
Hairball
The Stones were lucky to have Mick Taylor in the band.
I saw the Bluesbreakers reunion with Mick Taylor in 1982 at the Roxy in L.A., and the sheer quality of his playing was breathtaking.
The man could play indeed, I mean really play. A great example below, 1982.
John Mayall's voice is not Jagger's of course.
[www.youtube.com]
Quote
TheflyingDutchmanQuote
Hairball
The Stones were lucky to have Mick Taylor in the band.
I saw the Bluesbreakers reunion with Mick Taylor in 1982 at the Roxy in L.A., and the sheer quality of his playing was breathtaking.
The man could play indeed, I mean really play. A great example below, 1982.
John Mayall's voice is not Jagger's of course.
[www.youtube.com]
Quote
HairballQuote
TheflyingDutchmanQuote
Hairball
The Stones were lucky to have Mick Taylor in the band.
I saw the Bluesbreakers reunion with Mick Taylor in 1982 at the Roxy in L.A., and the sheer quality of his playing was breathtaking.
The man could play indeed, I mean really play. A great example below, 1982.
John Mayall's voice is not Jagger's of course.
[www.youtube.com]
And yes of course Mayall's voice is not quite like Jagger's, but one could possibly say there's a bit more heart and soul, or even 'authenticity' with Mayall singing the blues vs. Jagger.
Can't say I would fully agree with that as I do prefer Jagger, but it could have something to do with Mayall's lifelong journey playing/singing the blues almost exclusively vs. Micks foray into multiple genres (pop, rock, disco, etc., etc., etc.)
Listening to video as I type, and that solo is smoking hot!