Tell Me :
Talk
This is the very thing that has made me think that the Stones exists any longer just formally (in words and in abstract business contracts). The most shocking feature in LIFE was for me to realize that Keith Richards is not loyal to the band any longer. If we would he would never have published such tabloid-stuff gossips as he does there, and no to ridicule the guy who is the true leader of the band. It was just an ego play. it is not any longer "us", or The Stones, it is me and them, me and Mick. The band is not his prority any longer - it is just Keith Richards.
- Doxa
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2011-05-26 09:09 by Doxa.
Could be but I believe that Cohl has joined the privileged club of Eric Easton, Andrew Loog Oldham, Allan Klein, Bill Graham, etc. that only interests Stones historians nowadays. Well, at least I wish he did...
- Doxa
But at 4 years old, I'm not sure Keith had quite developed his guitar chops. Certainly was years from developing the Open G, 5 string stylings.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Interviews with Keith(about Mick, 2012 tour) and Mick(about Super Heavy)
Posted by:
Shawn20
()
Date: May 25, 2011 22:54
For many years Keith was the Stone who couldn't wait to get back on the road. I am certain he would not want to admit to any current physical limitations that would prevent a future tour. I also believe Jagger will never throw Richards under the bus by saying - "If not for Keef, we'd be out there - he just can't do it any more."
Re: Interviews with Keith(about Mick, 2012 tour) and Mick(about Super Heavy)
Posted by:
Rip This
()
Date: May 26, 2011 02:32
a sober and committed KR would be something to see.
Re: Interviews with Keith(about Mick, 2012 tour) and Mick(about Super Heavy)
Posted by:
Doxa
()
Date: May 26, 2011 09:05
Quote
Justin
Out of everyone, it seems Keith loves this band as strongly as he did 40 years ago...yet he's doing a good job of burning bridges with the one guy he needs to get the band active again...Jagger.
This is the very thing that has made me think that the Stones exists any longer just formally (in words and in abstract business contracts). The most shocking feature in LIFE was for me to realize that Keith Richards is not loyal to the band any longer. If we would he would never have published such tabloid-stuff gossips as he does there, and no to ridicule the guy who is the true leader of the band. It was just an ego play. it is not any longer "us", or The Stones, it is me and them, me and Mick. The band is not his prority any longer - it is just Keith Richards.
- Doxa
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2011-05-26 09:09 by Doxa.
Re: Interviews with Keith(about Mick, 2012 tour) and Mick(about Super Heavy)
Posted by:
Doxa
()
Date: May 26, 2011 09:18
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
Doxa
(after that it is up to the Big Guy - the one even bigger than Jagger).
- Doxa
ummm...Michael Cohl?
Could be but I believe that Cohl has joined the privileged club of Eric Easton, Andrew Loog Oldham, Allan Klein, Bill Graham, etc. that only interests Stones historians nowadays. Well, at least I wish he did...- Doxa
Re: Interviews with Keith(about Mick, 2012 tour) and Mick(about Super Heavy)
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: May 26, 2011 10:43
Re: Interviews with Keith(about Mick, 2012 tour) and Mick(about Super Heavy)
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: May 26, 2011 17:09
But at 4 years old, I'm not sure Keith had quite developed his guitar chops. Certainly was years from developing the Open G, 5 string stylings.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
2004Man , Asgard60 , Britney , bv , daspyknows , DiamondDog7 , gastonl74 , retired_dog , riccardo99 , rocknola , rstoned , Stilllife09 , stoned52 , stonesmuziekfan
Guests:
1412
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10