Tell Me :
Talk
No, you won't! Hey at least I didn't start the thread with the word "PERV".
Nothing like it...
I think its already turned out. And pretty much in line with my initial guesswork.
She owns the stuff, the contents of the house, as part of the divorce
settlement. What did Ronnie think she was gonna do with it, start a Ronnie museum?
And just how "staggered" and "shocked" can he really be when his statement
includes the fact that he turned down an invitation to participate in the
auction?
I guess Ronnie was hoping that she would sell the rock memorabilia more
discretely, piece by piece quietly to dealers. But obviously its been decided
to go for the publicity value of running a Rolling Stone rummage sale, to
hopefully boost the value of the non-rock collectibles. If there's something
in the sale Ronnie wants back, he's just gonna have to buy it.
The only action she took that was nasty was implying that her and Ronnie were
selling the stuff jointly. But she and the auctioneers figured correctly that
that would get a rise out of Ronnie and therefore extra publicity.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-27 01:13 by superrevvy.
I agree with you on all counts. Why should she want to have a house full of stuff that reminds her of a bygone era? She can't even be accused of profiteering since the proceeds are going to charity.
No. Some small percentage will go to the designated charity, but this is mostly
for Jo. Money she needs, I'm guessing. And whether she needs it or not, its hers.
"portion"
Ahhh shucks! I'm just 'working my little patch of it'.
Hope someone tells Ronnie quick enough about that Strat.
A '55 Fender Strat alone is worth a small fortune today.
Then owned and played by Ronnie Wood of Stones/Faces fame it would sell for big bucks.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-27 16:03 by Phil Good.
Yep, quite aware....but
was Jo aware what this guitar is?
perhaps she thought it was just another guitar that Ron was going to paint on.
or similar to her pink ESP Strat that Ron gave her.
since the '55 Strat doesn't have it's original case, it could have been mis-represented or wasn't looked at properly until auction listing.
looks more like a working tool to me.
I wasnt aware of much of it, except I knew she was his wife and life partner for a long long time, and knowing that is enough for me to being careful about what I posted here regarding all of this. I am not worthy to make a judgement about what she can/should/might do, or about what he did, or any of it. It is their business... and they sure are not the first (or last) couple to get a divorce. Anyway... It all just seems kind of sad.
Absolutely true and understandable. But there are several ways to get rid of that stuff. One of them is giving it back to Ronnie.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Agree totally.
Ronnie used to be "organized" by his ex-wife and now she does what she used to do....
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Cocaine Eyes
()
Date: September 26, 2012 23:05
[www.bbc.co.uk]
Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood has said he is "staggered" and "shocked" by a sale of art and memorabilia, organised by his former wife Jo.
Rolling Stones tour outfits and a custom Fender Stratocaster are among the lots being offered at auction in Los Angeles next month.
Wood said some of the items were "clearly his personal belongings" and that he had no involvement in the sale.
The couple's divorce was finalised in 2011, after 24 years of marriage.
They had separated three years earlier, after Ronnie's widely reported relationship with waitress Ekaterina Ivanova.
Julien's Auctions in Beverly Hills announced on Wednesday that Jo was putting band memorabilia, which she had collected over the years, under the hammer as part of the sale, which is expected to raise up to $500,000 (£388,000).
Should it go ahead, the auction will benefit MusiCares, the Grammys charity that offers recovery to people in the music industry.
The collection features memorabilia spanning four decades, from the guitarist's work with the Rolling Stones, his earlier association with Faces and his solo career.
Items include worn leather jackets, backstage passes from various Rolling Stones tours, and portraits of Keith Richards, Eric Clapton, and Bob Dylan.
Antiques, furniture and art from the Woods' former home in Surrey will also be included in the forthcoming sale.
An Erard harp is expected to raise up to $5,000 (£3,884), while a bronze jockey statue by Dame Elisabeth Frink could fetch as much as $85,000 (£66,000).
'Outrageous sale'
Darren Julien of Julien's Auctions announced the sale, saying: "They are still very good friends and they just decided it was time to simplify and sell some of their property."
But Ronnie Wood later released a statement through his publicist, saying he had declined the offer to participate.
"He is therefore shocked and disappointed that this auction is being misrepresented as a joint sale. This is not the case."
The statement continued: "Ronnie feels saddened that Jo has taken this course of action and wants the public to know he has not teamed up with Jo on this outrageous sale."
Jo Wood and her representatives were not immediately available to respond to the statement.
Wood, 65, has been focusing on his art career of late and opened an art show in April entitled, Faces, Time and Places in New York.
He also fronts programmes on Absolute Radio and the Sky Arts Channel that have him chatting and "jamming" with fellow musicians.
Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood has said he is "staggered" and "shocked" by a sale of art and memorabilia, organised by his former wife Jo.
Rolling Stones tour outfits and a custom Fender Stratocaster are among the lots being offered at auction in Los Angeles next month.
Wood said some of the items were "clearly his personal belongings" and that he had no involvement in the sale.
The couple's divorce was finalised in 2011, after 24 years of marriage.
They had separated three years earlier, after Ronnie's widely reported relationship with waitress Ekaterina Ivanova.
Julien's Auctions in Beverly Hills announced on Wednesday that Jo was putting band memorabilia, which she had collected over the years, under the hammer as part of the sale, which is expected to raise up to $500,000 (£388,000).
Should it go ahead, the auction will benefit MusiCares, the Grammys charity that offers recovery to people in the music industry.
The collection features memorabilia spanning four decades, from the guitarist's work with the Rolling Stones, his earlier association with Faces and his solo career.
Items include worn leather jackets, backstage passes from various Rolling Stones tours, and portraits of Keith Richards, Eric Clapton, and Bob Dylan.
Antiques, furniture and art from the Woods' former home in Surrey will also be included in the forthcoming sale.
An Erard harp is expected to raise up to $5,000 (£3,884), while a bronze jockey statue by Dame Elisabeth Frink could fetch as much as $85,000 (£66,000).
'Outrageous sale'
Darren Julien of Julien's Auctions announced the sale, saying: "They are still very good friends and they just decided it was time to simplify and sell some of their property."
But Ronnie Wood later released a statement through his publicist, saying he had declined the offer to participate.
"He is therefore shocked and disappointed that this auction is being misrepresented as a joint sale. This is not the case."
The statement continued: "Ronnie feels saddened that Jo has taken this course of action and wants the public to know he has not teamed up with Jo on this outrageous sale."
Jo Wood and her representatives were not immediately available to respond to the statement.
Wood, 65, has been focusing on his art career of late and opened an art show in April entitled, Faces, Time and Places in New York.
He also fronts programmes on Absolute Radio and the Sky Arts Channel that have him chatting and "jamming" with fellow musicians.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: September 26, 2012 23:07
will i get into trubble with the, 'a woman scorned' observation?
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Cocaine Eyes
()
Date: September 26, 2012 23:08
Quote
treaclefingers
will i get into trubble with the, 'a woman scorned' observation?
No, you won't! Hey at least I didn't start the thread with the word "PERV".
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
tumbled
()
Date: September 26, 2012 23:12
Ronnie shouldn't have left his stuff over there.
geesh.
geesh.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
latebloomer
()
Date: September 26, 2012 23:13
Quote
treaclefingers
will i get into trubble with the, 'a woman scorned' observation?
Nothing like it...
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 26, 2012 23:28
Wood said some of the items were "clearly his personal belongings" and that he had no involvement in the sale.
Sure looks like some of his personal items to me. I started to talk about it in the other the thread, but I stopped short, not knowing what the situation was... but it sure looks like his stuff to me.
Maybe he will have to buy his own stuff back... who knows...
Sure looks like some of his personal items to me. I started to talk about it in the other the thread, but I stopped short, not knowing what the situation was... but it sure looks like his stuff to me.
Maybe he will have to buy his own stuff back... who knows...
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 27, 2012 00:00
Thank you Cocaine Eyes for being such a good/often
finder of Stones related news and sharing it with us
finder of Stones related news and sharing it with us
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
latebloomer
()
Date: September 27, 2012 00:01
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Thank you Cocaine Eyes for being such a good/often
finder of Stones related news and sharing it with us
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 27, 2012 00:02
It will be intersting to see how this all turns out.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-27 00:08 by Max'sKansasCity.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-27 00:08 by Max'sKansasCity.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: September 27, 2012 00:55
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
It will be intersting to see how this all turns out.
I think its already turned out. And pretty much in line with my initial guesswork.
She owns the stuff, the contents of the house, as part of the divorce
settlement. What did Ronnie think she was gonna do with it, start a Ronnie museum?
And just how "staggered" and "shocked" can he really be when his statement
includes the fact that he turned down an invitation to participate in the
auction?
I guess Ronnie was hoping that she would sell the rock memorabilia more
discretely, piece by piece quietly to dealers. But obviously its been decided
to go for the publicity value of running a Rolling Stone rummage sale, to
hopefully boost the value of the non-rock collectibles. If there's something
in the sale Ronnie wants back, he's just gonna have to buy it.
The only action she took that was nasty was implying that her and Ronnie were
selling the stuff jointly. But she and the auctioneers figured correctly that
that would get a rise out of Ronnie and therefore extra publicity.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-27 01:13 by superrevvy.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
rebelrebel
()
Date: September 27, 2012 12:05
Quote
superrevvyQuote
Max'sKansasCity
It will be intersting to see how this all turns out.
I think its already turned out. And pretty much in line with my initial guesswork.
She owns the stuff, the contents of the house, as part of the divorce
settlement. What did Ronnie think she was gonna do with it, start a Ronnie museum?
And just how "staggered" and "shocked" can he really be when his statement
includes the fact that he turned down an invitation to participate in the
auction?
I guess Ronnie was hoping that she would sell the rock memorabilia more
discretely, piece by piece quietly to dealers. But obviously its been decided
to go for the publicity value of running a Rolling Stone rummage sale, to
hopefully boost the value of the non-rock collectibles. If there's something
in the sale Ronnie wants back, he's just gonna have to buy it.
The only action she took that was nasty was implying that her and Ronnie were
selling the stuff jointly. But she and the auctioneers figured correctly that
that would get a rise out of Ronnie and therefore extra publicity.
I agree with you on all counts. Why should she want to have a house full of stuff that reminds her of a bygone era? She can't even be accused of profiteering since the proceeds are going to charity.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: September 27, 2012 12:58
Quote
rebelrebel
She can't even be accused of profiteering since the proceeds are going to charity.
No. Some small percentage will go to the designated charity, but this is mostly
for Jo. Money she needs, I'm guessing. And whether she needs it or not, its hers.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 27, 2012 13:10
Quote
superrevvyQuote
rebelrebel
She can't even be accused of profiteering since the proceeds are going to charity.
No. Some small percentage will go to the designated charity, but this is mostly
for Jo. Money she needs, I'm guessing. And whether she needs it or not, its hers.
"portion"
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Cocaine Eyes
()
Date: September 27, 2012 14:02
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Thank you Cocaine Eyes for being such a good/often
finder of Stones related news and sharing it with us
Ahhh shucks! I'm just 'working my little patch of it'.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 27, 2012 14:05
Quote
Cocaine EyesQuote
Max'sKansasCity
Thank you Cocaine Eyes for being such a good/often
finder of Stones related news and sharing it with us
Ahhh shucks! I'm just 'working my little patch of it'.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Wizzard
()
Date: September 27, 2012 14:13
I am sure the guy left their former home, leaving his ex wife all the stuff and she had to take care of it and now he's disappointed the she would like to get rid of all his belongings...><
<Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
open-g
()
Date: September 27, 2012 15:00
I don't care much about the auction but one item, # 609 strikes as a 'could-be-mistake' ???
Ronnie was in a bad state when he left the house.
perhaps he didn't remember that he left a....
1955 Fender Stratocaster in sunburst finish with a maple neck and black dot inlays. Serial number 6634.
Not original case.
there's still 29 days to go.
maybe/hopefully that item won't be up for grabs.
Go Ronnie, go!
Ronnie was in a bad state when he left the house.
perhaps he didn't remember that he left a....
1955 Fender Stratocaster in sunburst finish with a maple neck and black dot inlays. Serial number 6634.
Not original case.
there's still 29 days to go.
maybe/hopefully that item won't be up for grabs.
Go Ronnie, go!
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Phil Good
()
Date: September 27, 2012 15:31
Quote
open-g
Ronnie was in a bad state when he left the house.
perhaps he didn't remember that he left a....
1955 Fender Stratocaster in sunburst finish with a maple neck and black dot inlays. Serial number 6634.
Not original case.
there's still 29 days to go.
maybe/hopefully that item won't be up for grabs.
Go Ronnie, go!
Hope someone tells Ronnie quick enough about that Strat.
A '55 Fender Strat alone is worth a small fortune today.
Then owned and played by Ronnie Wood of Stones/Faces fame it would sell for big bucks.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-27 16:03 by Phil Good.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Cocaine Eyes
()
Date: September 27, 2012 15:38
Just to play devil's advocate here for a moment - are you guys aware of the fact that for MANY years Jo was Ronnie's manager/handler? She basically was his 'Jane Rose'.
She was on the RS payroll. She helped create an organic line of products which Keith uses as well as Ronnie. She was WELL ACCEPTED as Ronnie's 'Jane Rose'.
So......perhaps Jo thinks that she's entitled to this stuff as a RS (former) employee.
Just sayin'.
She was on the RS payroll. She helped create an organic line of products which Keith uses as well as Ronnie. She was WELL ACCEPTED as Ronnie's 'Jane Rose'.
So......perhaps Jo thinks that she's entitled to this stuff as a RS (former) employee.
Just sayin'.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
open-g
()
Date: September 27, 2012 16:00
Quote
Cocaine Eyes
Just to play devil's advocate here for a moment - are you guys aware of the fact that for MANY years Jo was Ronnie's manager/handler? She basically was his 'Jane Rose'.
She was on the RS payroll. She helped create an organic line of products which Keith uses as well as Ronnie. She was WELL ACCEPTED as Ronnie's 'Jane Rose'.
So......perhaps Jo thinks that she's entitled to this stuff as a RS (former) employee.
Just sayin'.
Yep, quite aware....but
was Jo aware what this guitar is?
perhaps she thought it was just another guitar that Ron was going to paint on.
or similar to her pink ESP Strat that Ron gave her.
since the '55 Strat doesn't have it's original case, it could have been mis-represented or wasn't looked at properly until auction listing.
looks more like a working tool to me.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: September 27, 2012 16:20
Quote
Cocaine Eyes
Just to play devil's advocate here for a moment - are you guys aware of the fact that for MANY years Jo was Ronnie's manager/handler? She basically was his 'Jane Rose'.
She was on the RS payroll. She helped create an organic line of products which Keith uses as well as Ronnie. She was WELL ACCEPTED as Ronnie's 'Jane Rose'.
So......perhaps Jo thinks that she's entitled to this stuff as a RS (former) employee.
Just sayin'.
I wasnt aware of much of it, except I knew she was his wife and life partner for a long long time, and knowing that is enough for me to being careful about what I posted here regarding all of this. I am not worthy to make a judgement about what she can/should/might do, or about what he did, or any of it. It is their business... and they sure are not the first (or last) couple to get a divorce. Anyway... It all just seems kind of sad.
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
varilla
()
Date: September 27, 2012 18:25
Can you imagine if someday Jane Rose puts Keith belongings to auction....
Micawber, the skull ring, the ratchet knife...
Micawber, the skull ring, the ratchet knife...
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Harm
()
Date: September 29, 2012 14:17
Some cool stuff though
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
runrudolph
()
Date: September 29, 2012 15:10
Ronnie better ask some friends with money to buy his stuff at the auction. that way he will get them back.
and.... with a few shows he can pay his friendswhou bought his stuff at the auction.
jeroen
and.... with a few shows he can pay his friendswhou bought his stuff at the auction.
jeroen
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: September 29, 2012 15:49
Quote
rebelrebel
Why should she want to have a house full of stuff that reminds her of a bygone era?
Absolutely true and understandable. But there are several ways to get rid of that stuff. One of them is giving it back to Ronnie.
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
ThroughTheLonelyNights
()
Date: September 30, 2012 07:02
Quote
tumbled
Ronnie shouldn't have left his stuff over there.
geesh.
Agree totally.
Ronnie used to be "organized" by his ex-wife and now she does what she used to do....
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
stonesnow
()
Date: September 30, 2012 09:16
UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Marriage
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
TE
()
Date: September 30, 2012 10:11
We should start collect money and send Matt over!
But guess he will be there anyway. Better he get some
of the stuff instead of a jerk with to much money, me think!
TE
Oslo
But guess he will be there anyway. Better he get some
of the stuff instead of a jerk with to much money, me think!
TE
Oslo
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
Harm
()
Date: September 30, 2012 14:15
Ronnie could easily buy all items that he wants back. It's just her way to say: Fuk you RQuote
TE
We should start collect money and send Matt over!
But guess he will be there anyway. Better he get some
of the stuff instead of a jerk with to much money, me think!
TE
Oslo
Re: UPDATE: Ronnie DENIES Involvement In Auction
Posted by:
1cdog
()
Date: September 30, 2012 15:54
My guess is that the only thing Ronnie's really pissed about with this auction is that some of the proceeds are going to Charity - instead of Ronnie himself.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-30 15:59 by 1cdog.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-09-30 15:59 by 1cdog.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
bv , Dan , edwinholland , eibert , GeirGG , Kobroo , MJAGGER123 , MonkeyMan2000 , NeddieFlanders , no stone unturned , RnT , straycatuk , walkingthedog , Whale , wupperstein , yyclassical
Guests:
963
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10