For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Title5Take1
They just haven't done enough live renditions of HONKY TONK WOMEN and TUMBLIN' DICE.
I'd prefer a new studio album by a mile.
Quote
Rockman
...Studio album ...and make it a double
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
If you had to choose one, what would it be?
Difficult choice, but I think I would choose a new album with all new songs.
Of course we are going to get both at some point, but which one would mean more to you as a fan?
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
If you had to choose one, what would it be?
Difficult choice, but I think I would choose a new album with all new songs.
Of course we are going to get both at some point, but which one would mean more to you as a fan?
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
Neither.
Box set, unreleased material.
Quote
StonesTodQuote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
Neither.
Box set, unreleased material.
new or old mick vox?
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
Neither.
Box set, unreleased material.
Quote
GazzaQuote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
Neither.
Box set, unreleased material.
Nice idea if enough of the songs are a) finished and b) good.
I'd take it a bit further and suggest that more preferable to any new album, new tour or boxed set would be an onging series of multiple disc live releases from the archives a la the Dead's "Dick's Picks" series........
'Gazza's Picks' has a nice ring to it.
Quote
Justin
If we're getting an archive box set it's no wonder they're back in the studio...they're adding new vocals and music to the 30 year old, unfinished songs!
If they can release untouched outtakes without any 2012 overdubs...I'm for it. But if they (Mick) has to resort to filling in the gaps with modern overdubs...forget the whole damn thing.
Quote
SweetThingQuote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
If you had to choose one, what would it be?
Difficult choice, but I think I would choose a new album with all new songs.
Of course we are going to get both at some point, but which one would mean more to you as a fan?
I don't imagine them sustaining even the quality of the last tour, and no bad feelings on that; as others have said they don't "owe" anyone anything at this point, and they shouldn't be faulted for simply aging.
So I would say a genuinely "new" album (not a compilation) would be the best choice from my point of view. I see it as getting something that might still have a chance of being "great" - if they look at it the same way that is, as a memorable swan song and do justice to their legacy. However unlikely that may be, it is at least possible. Something that isn't true of a live performance any longer I don't believe.
Now, if they in fact choose to do a handful of gigs and HBO special, festival or whatever, of course it would be wonderful to see them on stage together again.
If I really had my way, silly as it may be to indulge such fantasy, the Glimmers would lean heavily on Mick Taylor and Ronnie Wood on the creative for whatever might be squeezed out of those two at this late date, because I just feel the Jagger/Richards creative relationship is likely very stale, albeit I am reasonably sure they've let bygones be bygones on a personal level. But I don't think their craftsmanship at working a recording is stale at all. Just that they would benefit from a few more sources of inspiration - as Keith did with the Winos and Mick did with Superheavy.
Of course they could do a "Last Waltz" type of thing with two dozen A or B list near contemporaries - but they won't.