For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Gazza
In a word - no.
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Just sayingQuote
nocommentQuote
Max'sKansasCity
c'mon Max, you too. Spill or speculate.
Quote
nocommentQuote
Gazza
In a word - no.
think at some point, you mentioned that some specifics might be forthcoming
shortly. do you have further info now, even if you can't share it?
Quote
GazzaQuote
nocommentQuote
Gazza
In a word - no.
think at some point, you mentioned that some specifics might be forthcoming
shortly. do you have further info now, even if you can't share it?
I dont recall saying THAT, to be honest!
My understanding is that the band have agreed to tour in 2012. However, I'd be a liar if I claimed to know any details beyond that.
Quote
bv
His smokescreen reason was Charlie... gives him some time...
Quote
nocomment
This question was asked on a related thread, and got zero replies.
1) Is there an offer from Cohl or LiveNation or both or someone else on the table?
2) If not, that is, if Mick is telling the truth, is it more a general economic
thing or specifically a "too risky" thing in terms of the health of some
of the members? remember, bono's back boo-boo has cost that tour almost all of
its profits, according to some reports.
3) assuming again that Mick truths when he says he doesnt know what will happen,
considering that the stones, if they want, have already gone out with a
considerable Bang, does it make any sense at all, from THEIR perspective, not
yours, to now instead go out with a whimper?
we know we are sometime fcukwits, but we are really trying to understand what
the fcuk is going on.
Quote
nocomment
This question was asked on a related thread, and got zero replies.
1) Is there an offer from Cohl or LiveNation or both or someone else on the table?
2) If not, that is, if Mick is telling the truth, is it more a general economic
thing or specifically a "too risky" thing in terms of the health of some
of the members? remember, bono's back boo-boo has cost that tour almost all of
its profits, according to some reports.
3) assuming again that Mick truths when he says he doesnt know what will happen,
considering that the stones, if they want, have already gone out with a
considerable Bang, does it make any sense at all, from THEIR perspective, not
yours, to now instead go out with a whimper?
we know we are sometime fcukwits, but we are really trying to understand what
the fcuk is going on.
Quote
DragonSky
You mean to tell me his cards aren't on the table? They usually are aren't they?
Quote
TeddyB1018
For those of you worried about Keith, the band hasn't toured without a safety net in 30 years.
Quote
Midnight Toker
I believe MJ. A horrible global economy that keeps getting worse, has caused MJ to think twice. He is such a a conservaive guy with money, I don't see him putting his financial ass on the line assuming such a huge risk like a huge stadium tour. IMO.
No big tour. Maybe a few arenas and a Pay per view event. That is how I see it. And the tiny todger incident, I dont have a warm and fuzzy feeling about MJ and KR ever writing together again. Time is not on their side.
Quote
aprilfool
Do you really want to go to a new tour, Mick talks of risks about money and profit but I'm talking about the ability of the band playing well. I HOPE there will be no new tour. Open the vaults. All the good years are behind them. When it's time to stop with "elegance", don't go to a catastrophic ending.