Very good Interview with Jagger in the Chicago Tribune today in which he admits that a lot of the new tracks were pretty skeletel and that the Stones added a lot when they reworked them. Disappointing but we all knew this anyway.


[leisureblogs.chicagotribune.com]

I thought the article was very good in that it is critical of the Stones for rereleasing Exile with really no new material. Exactly how I feel.

MIck: "But “Following the River” was originally called “Wally’s Whistling Saw.” I wasn’t going to stick with that title for a romantic ballad."




IORR............but I like it!

HEY!!! Cooooooooooooool read thanks stonesseventytwo...........



ROCKMAN

Good God, Jagger must be talking to every media outlet in the civilized world. I next expect to see an interview with him in my old junior high school paper.

Quote
71Tele
Good God, Jagger must be talking to every media outlet in the civilized world. I next expect to see an interview with him in my old junior high school paper.

well..Chicago is a major city.

it's too bad he didn't ask (& clear up) the Mick Taylor rumor.
MJ didn't volunteer that info either.
[www.iorr.org]


IORR............but I like it!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-05-13 02:10 by sweet neo con.

Thanks for posting that interview, stonesseventytwo.
was a good read.

Open g- Hey no prob. I also thought it was very good. The one with Keith is also good. Seems that Keith didn't want to mess with any of the original material but I guess Jagger overrode him. It would be a nice package if they had just included the book and the DVD without adding these 1972/2010 hybrid songs. Oh well.

When you go on the Chicago Tribune web site click 'entertainment' and then 'theater'. Scroll down and on the right hand side you will see a link for a new play in Chicago called "Aftermath" about the early Rolling Stones.

Rob