For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
whitem8
Good piont about the Stones possibly missing an oppotunity with their older fan base, who also have the most expendable income to boot!
Quote
deadegad
They have played so below par for so long.
Quote
Filip020169Quote
deadegad
They have played so below par for so long.
That is just downright rude, and simply not true. Sure, they don't sound like the 1972 Stones anymore, nor like the 1966 or the 1981 Stones for that matter; ànd there is much to say about the line-up of the backing band etc. ... but they have never, NEVER played "below par"- not by general (contemporary) and/or historic rock'n'roll standards, and not even by their own.
Quote
Loudei
I really like to know what you people think is in the vaults? The last few vault openings: Metamorphosis, Tattoo You, R&R Circus, what else? Rarities does not qualify. What else could be out there? Beatles Anthology part II? DREAM ON.
The Stones are done.
you dont have a clue talking about the police reunion tour.it was magnificent .i caught the police live at madison square garden on halloween and the blew the roof off the dump .a true musical highlight in my rich concert history with all three founding members .Quote
Filip020169Quote
deadegad
They have played so below par for so long.
That is just downright rude, and simply not true. Sure, they don't sound like the 1972 Stones anymore, nor like the 1966 or the 1981 Stones for that matter; ànd there is much to say about the line-up of the backing band etc. ... but they have never, NEVER played "below par"- not by general (contemporary) and/or historic rock'n'roll standards, and not even by their own.
I do not understand the world...
We stand in line with millions for a Led Zeppelin reunion that’s never gonna happen; we rave at a ‘comeback’ tour of the Police that, musicwise, was one of the poorest things in rock’n’roll history; we smile broadly at the “Filthy Lucre” tour of the Sex Pistols, that gave us exactly what its title had promised; we bow our heads everytime sir Paul McCartney (not a ‘decent’ album since the early eighties… Wait! Where did we hear that before??) decides to gracefully come & play all his warhorses again; we enthusiastically applaud when Neil Young releases a new album with all new versions of his 3 archetypical songs for the umpteenth time again; ...
In 2011-2012 the Rolling Stones will celebrate 50 years of maximum rock’n’roll live on stage. And they will do so, of that we can be sure, in their best tradition.
To answer that quesion that one of you 'superfans' recently posed, and for which it was too late to put in my dime (thread has already been closed): sure I’ll be there.
Quote
nonfilter
Something tells me that they don't want to become relics, but furthermore don't want to compete with the 1972 Stones.
Quote
loog droog
They just released another live Sinatra box.
The only problem is, the original fan base is DEAD, or at least dying.
The young generation that was put down in the liner notes of the original pressing of Strangers In the Night are in their 60's now. They don't care much for Frank. That was their parents music.
What they'd like is the Stones.
If the Stones keep waiting, their original fans will either be dead as well, or they will be retired and won't have the disposable income to buy all the new unreleased stuff.
If you have to choose between medicine or the Stones, what do you choose?
(I know, I know...the Stones are your medicine )
But you see what I mean.
Quote
behroez
Who wants the vaults? There are enought boots out there. i much more prefer a new Stones album.
Quote
georgelicks
If we see their record sales during the last 4-5 years, it seems that the only fan base available is here on IORR.
The Stones' catalog was outsold by THE RAMONES last year, the new Exile release could be an epic flop.
Quote
mr edwardQuote
Filip020169Quote
deadegad
They have played so below par for so long.
That is just downright rude, and simply not true. Sure, they don't sound like the 1972 Stones anymore, nor like the 1966 or the 1981 Stones for that matter; ànd there is much to say about the line-up of the backing band etc. ... but they have never, NEVER played "below par"- not by general (contemporary) and/or historic rock'n'roll standards, and not even by their own.
Quote
behroez
Who wants the vaults? There are enought boots out there. i much more prefer a new Stones album.