T&A Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > i'm not sure how you'd evaluate it. would fans of > "pick a band" agree that IORR is a better site > than theirs?
Well it's pretty obvious isn't it. BV has done a lot of work for us all to enjoy and share. I'm not talking about the standard of the bands/artists work. We all listen to other music don't we. It's about the standard of the corresponding fan's site.
Springsteen and Dylan have got some great boards, but it's hard to compare. I like it best here. (if it wasn't for this #%*$@ computer, which is going mad, I have to buy a new one)
T&A Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > you mean it was a rhetorical question? oh - well, > then consider my answer to be ironic.
Silly question... Is there any alternative answer to "YES"?
Thank you Bjornulf for this great site, and all your work. I'm here since 1997, I entered during the B2B sessions, since then I'm up-to-date every minute. It's kind of bringing us much more nearer to the GREATEST ROCK BAND OF ALL TIME.
ohnonotyouagain Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ZZ Top's actual fan site is called > www.longbeardsexceptforfrankbeard.com
The RHCP site is awesome when the forum is working... redhotchilipeppers.com
The Motley Crue site is fantastic for us unapologetic Crue fans... motleycrue.com
John Fogerty's site is pretty good when he's touring.
These sites are ALL better when the band is touring, that's the key because alot of people are jumpin' on the forums then.
Also, IORR doesn't have any band input per-se... the other sites have alot of news directly from the band, e-mails from them from the road, alot of interviews, etc.
"It's just that demon life has got me in it's sway..."
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-02-18 08:12 by BornOnTheBayou.