An answer to an offensive post of Gazza. Sorry to make a new topic, but...
Date: September 11, 2005 06:28
...For technical reasons i cannot post anymore on Ket's topic "Could they possibly ever satisfy everybody?". But i cannot let unanswerable that post too. (Everyone can see the discussion on Ket's topic)
"You trot out the same tiresome meaningless statistics every time"
OK, Gazza i find tiresome and meaningless the 65% of your posts and the 99 % of your nagging. Can we discuss in this way? I mention again the statistics about the different songs on the past tours, in other words the variety of the lists, just because i am still waiting a clear answer and a clear comment from a "nagger" like you. You said "because is not 1981". Not a very smart answer...
Now i mention some OTHER statistics just because i don't want to "discuss" repeating boring clisse and being dogmatic, like you. You say: "In concert the band is going backwards in a creative sense. Anyone who cant see that is led by blind idolatry". What an "argument" !! What a democratic guy! Is a blind idolarty everyone who has the opinion that the band performs great on this tour? Is a blind idolatry everyone who asks you why is "boring" a list with 4 new songs, 2 new covers, 7-8 warhorses and some songs PARELY played on the previous tours?
OK, obviously you aren't able to answer but that's not a good reason to be so exasperated and impolite, OK?
PS 1: You know my opinion about the $ 450 so you say nothing once again.
PS 2: "Are you suggesting that if that was the case in 2005, youd be satisfied?"
Man, you understand nothing... I obviously mean exactly what i wrote. You can see it. Who is blind?
PS 3: "and how the f*ck can you ask a thousand different fans and have a billion different answers?". Another very "clever" question... OK, i see how many different opinions we have on this board and am speaking to 800 friends of mine who are fans. Are you satisfied now my old fart?