Re: AIR FRANCE PLANE went down @ PEARSON in TORONTO?
Date: August 4, 2005 21:28
TDZ is Touch Down Zone.
The glide path is a electronicly generated route (vertical) that places you on a path to the TDZ, a zone at the begining of the runway considered the optimum place to put your tires down if you want to stop in time (those heavily painted stripes you want to see just under your butt as you cross the threshhold).
"Witnesses nearer the airport
who saw them coming in said they thought the KLM pilot must
be crazy, it was quite harrowing, but he got down safely.
The Air France jet, by a few accounts, seemed to be
way to high for an approach."
Davido...I know it's just semantics but the biggest points to get out of your comments are " he got down safely".....wrong....folks were correct...he was crazy...this does not make it safe...it means he risked the flight and they were nothing more than lucky. Running off a runway usually means missing that TDZ so again the glide path would have to be too high.....time to back off then.
All the talk about a lightning strike and blackout before landings are misleading at that point. Lightning hit's aircraft daily and rarely creates life threatning conditions. As my previous point said there are usually several contributing factors, let your problems build up, like I'm too high, the last guy just made it, it's not looking good, Oh no the lights went out, Oh they are back on....not realy the time to think about extra problems.
"Pearson officials claim it was up to the pilots to decide
if they wanted to land at that point in time, but apparantly
nobody else tried it."
It is always the final decision of the PIC (pilot in command). The tower only passes on information. Given the advisories mentioned, the fact that the previous aircraft would have reported his difficulties, all others had declined......do you want to fly with this guy?
I hate to be negative and if one person had died I would have backed off out of respect and let Transport Canada define the incident, but this kind of blatant disregard for all that is good about flying ticks me off. So much focas is spent on the incidents and the few heroic victims that survive these things that we do not get to hear for a couple of years the official determination which in most cases is pilot error, the error that killed the others. The Canadian flight that glided to that island is a prime example, saved all these peoples lives, great, two years later it's pilot error that got them into it.
Classic case: worked with a South African airline pilot who worked with a national promoted because of race to fly 747. He was late for a flight to London and ordered the fuel crew to stop fueling so he could get going. All weather reports indicated London would be down for fog for the day...he left anyway. Got to London and he was declined planding because the visibility was "0". He declared an emergency because he did not have the required fuel on board to fly to the alternate, as required. He was declined because the airport can not clear you for disaster. The only saving grace is at the time the 747 was the only aircraft that could actualy land it'self minus retarding the throttles and applying the brakes. His instruments put the plane on the runway and he comes to a complete stop, but can not even see the ground from the cockpit so they stop dead in the middle of the runway. A truck is set out to guide him into the ramp but the truck runs into the nose gear due to the fog. The pilots hear a noise below and decide to drop a service hatch located above the landing gear to check out the noise and the hatch drops on the widsheild of the truck breaking it, the only damage. Now in South Africa the guy was declared a national hero for saving lives...he was banned from Europian airspace though.