Tell Me :
Talk
Yes he is .
I am always astonished -frighten - when I read stupid stories of nurses declaring having being @#$%& on the kitchen sink ....
while Jerry was playing with the children in the room next door...
I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
The Rolling Stones Blue Book
Jo Bergman's chronology (for the press?) of the Stones
from 1963 to 1969. Nice & unusual photo's, even if
everything is printed in a tasteful blue.
All text appears in English, French, German & Italian.
[www.amazon.com]
I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
Well...she is not the "worse "...
I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
It's my pleasure jlowe !
I always been interested in Stones books or magazines,but didn't found that one on ebay.uk .
85 dollars is a lot,it's also my opinion.
Although the value of the things is the price one is ready to buy it .
I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
VoodooLounge13
()
Date: April 22, 2009 18:44
Boy there are a lot of interesting people on that list. Interesting that some of them are now gay. LOL
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
jlowe
()
Date: April 22, 2009 19:36
I see his current girl is now "his main point of interest".
What about the Stones, then?
No mention of Bill's former "common law wife" = Astrid.
Perhaps the Mail ran out of space.
What about the Stones, then?
No mention of Bill's former "common law wife" = Astrid.
Perhaps the Mail ran out of space.
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
Pecman
()
Date: April 22, 2009 20:25
Seems like the only one he passed on was Bette Midler!
PECMAN
PECMAN
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
MKjan
()
Date: April 22, 2009 20:35
Some interesting choices, some very pretty, and some not so pretty. I am hoping there are many more, cause this list seems a lot less than what Mick Jagger could do.....
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
dougie
()
Date: April 22, 2009 23:21
And these are the ones the tabloids know about. How many more are there? What a guy. What else would you expect from the greatest rocker!
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
J.J.Flash
()
Date: April 23, 2009 03:30
ur right! u should be #1!!!!!!!!!!Quote
mickschix
Why was I left off the list????
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
hbwriter
()
Date: April 23, 2009 04:11
this thing is so rife with errors-met cyrinda foxe at studio 54 in 1971? it didn't open til 77
linda ronstadt never lived in mexico--and on and on
linda ronstadt never lived in mexico--and on and on
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
Bliss
()
Date: April 23, 2009 05:08
Why would Mick write 'Has Anybody Seen My Baby?'about Mary Badham, 27 years after he allegedly was involved with her? Even in her prime, no one could ever describe her as beautiful or ethereal, if that pic is anything to go by.
Lots left off that list...Janice Kenner, Catherine James, Bette Midler, not to mention David Bowie.
Lots left off that list...Janice Kenner, Catherine James, Bette Midler, not to mention David Bowie.
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: April 23, 2009 14:34
Well, isn't this a thin list of chics compared to Bills?
2 1 2 0
2 1 2 0
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
SwayStones
()
Date: April 23, 2009 14:36
I am sure that in almost every city, across every country, there is a woman who claims having in the past a "love story /bed story " to tell about Mick Jagger ! He remains relatively modest about his conquests .....
The following one (written by a man ) makes me smile .Enjoy !
I'm in a Love Triangle with Mick Jagger
Toby Young .
Two weeks ago a girl I'd been pursuing for a couple of months finally kissed me in a bar. In addition to being a sexy, dark-skinned beauty, she's difficult, complicated and something of a handful. In other words, totally irresistible. I couldn't believe my luck and, as it turned out, I was right. A couple of days later she gave me the bad news: She was involved with another man. He was a bit of a playboy, apparently, but all his friends assured her he was completely besotted. In fact, they'd never seen him like this with anyone before. So she was flying to London to spend some time with him. Maybe, if things didn't work out, she'd call me.
I found out the following day it was Jagger.
This is the second time I've lost a woman to the 55-year-old Rolling Stone and, frankly, I'm getting a little tired of it. To lose one woman to Mick Jagger may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose two looks like carelessness.
To tell the truth, the first time it happened I felt rather flattered. The woman in question was a gorgeous Chilian girl known-inevitably-as the Red Hot Chile Pepper. Okay, I didn't like being dumped for a married father-of-six but it did mean I was only two degrees of separation from some of the most beautiful women in the world. It was like a right of passage. I might have lost the game but I was playing in the big league now.
The second time around, it's not so much fun. 30 years ago, when Mick Jagger was still the Satanic Prince of the counter-culture, I might have understood. But he's a grandfather now, for heaven's sakes. What do women see in him? With his spindly little legs, oversized head and enormous lips he looks like a badly-drawn caricature. He has the face of a mummified horse.
He also exhibits all the 'bad' masculine traits that feminists have trained us to deplore. The girl I like has just flown to London to be with him, even though the Brazilian model who's carrying his love child has just flown to New York. The term 'love rat' doesn't begin to do him justice. He's the Bill Clinton of Rock 'n' Roll.
Yet women find him absolutely irresistible. What's going on?
Part of it, no doubt, is his considerable wealth. In addition to his estate in Richmond, he owns houses in the Loire Valley, Texas, Mustique and New York. According to the London Sunday Times, which produces an annual list of the 1,000 richest people in Britain, he's worth £150 million. That kind of money is guaranteed to impress even the most jaded supermodel.
There's also his image to contend with. Somehow, in spite of being the most commercially-minded Rock 'n' Roll figure since Colonel Tom Parker, Jagger has managed to cling on to his cool reputation. No one could seriously describe him as a rebel but some small, vestigial part of him remains untamed. As a result, he's as welcome in the Bowery as he is in the stately homes of England.
Above all, there's his sexuality. Jagger's hallmark as a performer has always been his pan-sexual eroticism. He has the louche manner of a jailhouse slut, the pouting coquettishness of a sex kitten, yet he's always been unmistakably heterosexual. He's able to incorporate aspects of feminine sexuality into his persona without seeming homosexual; he's camp without being a sissy. For some reason, women are powerless to resist this combination.
All this is complemented, of course, by his allegedly superhuman powers as a lover. You'd assume that his years of substance abuse would have taken their toll on his virility. Not a bit of it, apparently. When I asked his most recent conquest what on earth she saw in him, she told me he was the best lay she'd ever had.
"He's got the most incredible stamina," she panted. "We're talking five times a night."
"He must be on Viagra," I replied confidently.
"Absolutely not," she said. "The only things he takes are vitamins."
Whatever those vitamins are, I'd like to get hold of some.
I should point out here that I only have this woman's say so for any of this. It's possible that she was making it all up to spare my feelings. After all, if you're going to be passed over by a woman, it might as well be for the world's most notorious shagger. I would have felt a lot worse if she'd told me she was rejecting me for Harold Evans.
However, I'm inclined to believe she's telling the truth. Given the kind of life she leads, their paths would certainly overlap and, from what I know of him, she's very much his type. She's well-born, independently wealthy and a member of the Jet Set. The chances of her selling her story to the tabloids are pretty remote.
So, Jerry, if you're reading this, I'd call your divorce lawyer without delay. At this very moment, he's probably shacked up at Browns Hotel with my friend, throwing money away on baubles and champagne. Do I have to draw you a diagram? If I were you, I'd start proceedings straight away and screw the bastard for as much as you can get.
The New York Press
Tuesday 18th May 1999
I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
The following one (written by a man ) makes me smile .Enjoy !
I'm in a Love Triangle with Mick Jagger
Toby Young .
Two weeks ago a girl I'd been pursuing for a couple of months finally kissed me in a bar. In addition to being a sexy, dark-skinned beauty, she's difficult, complicated and something of a handful. In other words, totally irresistible. I couldn't believe my luck and, as it turned out, I was right. A couple of days later she gave me the bad news: She was involved with another man. He was a bit of a playboy, apparently, but all his friends assured her he was completely besotted. In fact, they'd never seen him like this with anyone before. So she was flying to London to spend some time with him. Maybe, if things didn't work out, she'd call me.
I found out the following day it was Jagger.
This is the second time I've lost a woman to the 55-year-old Rolling Stone and, frankly, I'm getting a little tired of it. To lose one woman to Mick Jagger may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose two looks like carelessness.
To tell the truth, the first time it happened I felt rather flattered. The woman in question was a gorgeous Chilian girl known-inevitably-as the Red Hot Chile Pepper. Okay, I didn't like being dumped for a married father-of-six but it did mean I was only two degrees of separation from some of the most beautiful women in the world. It was like a right of passage. I might have lost the game but I was playing in the big league now.
The second time around, it's not so much fun. 30 years ago, when Mick Jagger was still the Satanic Prince of the counter-culture, I might have understood. But he's a grandfather now, for heaven's sakes. What do women see in him? With his spindly little legs, oversized head and enormous lips he looks like a badly-drawn caricature. He has the face of a mummified horse.
He also exhibits all the 'bad' masculine traits that feminists have trained us to deplore. The girl I like has just flown to London to be with him, even though the Brazilian model who's carrying his love child has just flown to New York. The term 'love rat' doesn't begin to do him justice. He's the Bill Clinton of Rock 'n' Roll.
Yet women find him absolutely irresistible. What's going on?
Part of it, no doubt, is his considerable wealth. In addition to his estate in Richmond, he owns houses in the Loire Valley, Texas, Mustique and New York. According to the London Sunday Times, which produces an annual list of the 1,000 richest people in Britain, he's worth £150 million. That kind of money is guaranteed to impress even the most jaded supermodel.
There's also his image to contend with. Somehow, in spite of being the most commercially-minded Rock 'n' Roll figure since Colonel Tom Parker, Jagger has managed to cling on to his cool reputation. No one could seriously describe him as a rebel but some small, vestigial part of him remains untamed. As a result, he's as welcome in the Bowery as he is in the stately homes of England.
Above all, there's his sexuality. Jagger's hallmark as a performer has always been his pan-sexual eroticism. He has the louche manner of a jailhouse slut, the pouting coquettishness of a sex kitten, yet he's always been unmistakably heterosexual. He's able to incorporate aspects of feminine sexuality into his persona without seeming homosexual; he's camp without being a sissy. For some reason, women are powerless to resist this combination.
All this is complemented, of course, by his allegedly superhuman powers as a lover. You'd assume that his years of substance abuse would have taken their toll on his virility. Not a bit of it, apparently. When I asked his most recent conquest what on earth she saw in him, she told me he was the best lay she'd ever had.
"He's got the most incredible stamina," she panted. "We're talking five times a night."
"He must be on Viagra," I replied confidently.
"Absolutely not," she said. "The only things he takes are vitamins."
Whatever those vitamins are, I'd like to get hold of some.
I should point out here that I only have this woman's say so for any of this. It's possible that she was making it all up to spare my feelings. After all, if you're going to be passed over by a woman, it might as well be for the world's most notorious shagger. I would have felt a lot worse if she'd told me she was rejecting me for Harold Evans.
However, I'm inclined to believe she's telling the truth. Given the kind of life she leads, their paths would certainly overlap and, from what I know of him, she's very much his type. She's well-born, independently wealthy and a member of the Jet Set. The chances of her selling her story to the tabloids are pretty remote.
So, Jerry, if you're reading this, I'd call your divorce lawyer without delay. At this very moment, he's probably shacked up at Browns Hotel with my friend, throwing money away on baubles and champagne. Do I have to draw you a diagram? If I were you, I'd start proceedings straight away and screw the bastard for as much as you can get.
The New York Press
Tuesday 18th May 1999
I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
SwayStones
()
Date: April 23, 2009 14:38
To lose one woman to Mick Jagger may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose two looks like carelessness.
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: April 23, 2009 14:52
Well Mick's just straight out lucky he can find dolls that wanna do it 5 times a night ....
ROCKMAN
ROCKMAN
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
Doxa
()
Date: April 23, 2009 15:42
One can put it this way: if some day Mick finally decides to write autobiography, and using the example of Bill Wyman, and makes it a kind of scoring history a'la Bill - it will be MUCH more interesting to read than Bill's stories of those young nameless groupies all over the world. Perhaps he could name it STONE NOT SO ALONE...
But of course, Mick will not to do it. He is a gentleman and keeps private affairs behind the curtains.
- Doxa
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009-04-23 15:44 by Doxa.
But of course, Mick will not to do it. He is a gentleman and keeps private affairs behind the curtains.
- Doxa
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009-04-23 15:44 by Doxa.
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
SwayStones
()
Date: April 23, 2009 15:53
Quote
Doxa
.
But of course, Mick will not to do it. He is a gentleman and keeps private affairs behind the curtains.
- Doxa
Yes he is .
I am always astonished -frighten - when I read stupid stories of nurses declaring having being @#$%& on the kitchen sink ....
while Jerry was playing with the children in the room next door...I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
jlowe
()
Date: April 23, 2009 20:15
Ironic really , Mick is sort of admired for his roll call of women.
Ronnie on the other hand finds his marriage of 20+ years has run out of steam , so he hooks up with a 20 year old and is promptly castigated by some and accused of "losing his marbles".
Strange days, indeed.
Ronnie on the other hand finds his marriage of 20+ years has run out of steam , so he hooks up with a 20 year old and is promptly castigated by some and accused of "losing his marbles".
Strange days, indeed.
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
KSIE
()
Date: April 23, 2009 21:54
Quote
Bliss
Why would Mick write 'Has Anybody Seen My Baby?'about Mary Badham, 27 years after he allegedly was involved with her? Even in her prime, no one could ever describe her as beautiful or ethereal, if that pic is anything to go by.
Mick Jagger DID Scout????? And SHE dumped him??? Absolutely the funniest thing I've heard in a long time..........
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009-04-23 22:18 by KSIE.
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
Marmalade
()
Date: April 24, 2009 04:19
>>To lose one woman to Mick Jagger may be regarded as a misfortune;
to lose two looks like carelessness.<<
That's a modification of an Oscar Wilde quote. Wilde said:
"To lose one parent, Mr Worthing, may be regarded as a misfortune;
to lose both looks like carelessness."
- from "A Woman of No Importance"
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009-04-24 04:19 by Marmalade.
to lose two looks like carelessness.<<
That's a modification of an Oscar Wilde quote. Wilde said:
"To lose one parent, Mr Worthing, may be regarded as a misfortune;
to lose both looks like carelessness."
- from "A Woman of No Importance"
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009-04-24 04:19 by Marmalade.
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
jlowe
()
Date: April 24, 2009 15:39
The article suggests that Jo Bergman, Stones Manger and Mick's PA from around 1967/72 has written a book.
I've checked Amazon - no trace.
Has anyone seen it?
I've checked Amazon - no trace.
Has anyone seen it?
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
SwayStones
()
Date: April 24, 2009 16:49
Quote
jlowe
The article suggests that Jo Bergman, Stones Manger and Mick's PA from around 1967/72 has written a book.
I've checked Amazon - no trace.
Has anyone seen it?
The Rolling Stones Blue Book
Jo Bergman's chronology (for the press?) of the Stones
from 1963 to 1969. Nice & unusual photo's, even if
everything is printed in a tasteful blue.
All text appears in English, French, German & Italian.
[www.amazon.com]
I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
dcba
()
Date: April 24, 2009 16:55
Annie Leibowitz...? Oh my god!
As they say "a d!ck has no eyes"
As they say "a d!ck has no eyes"
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
jlowe
()
Date: April 24, 2009 16:57
Hey, thanks. I had done a search, but nothing came up.
$85 seems a lot of dosh, although (for me)its their most interesting period (1967/72).
Perhaps I should try my local Library - or EBay.
$85 seems a lot of dosh, although (for me)its their most interesting period (1967/72).
Perhaps I should try my local Library - or EBay.
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
SwayStones
()
Date: April 24, 2009 17:58
Quote
dcba
Annie Leibowitz...? Oh my god!
As they say "a d!ck has no eyes"
Well...she is not the "worse "...
I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
Re: Mick's Chics
Posted by:
SwayStones
()
Date: April 24, 2009 18:04
Quote
jlowe
Hey, thanks. I had done a search, but nothing came up.
$85 seems a lot of dosh, although (for me)its their most interesting period (1967/72).
Perhaps I should try my local Library - or EBay.
It's my pleasure jlowe !
I always been interested in Stones books or magazines,but didn't found that one on ebay.uk .
85 dollars is a lot,it's also my opinion.
Although the value of the things is the price one is ready to buy it .
I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
dadrob , fareastlansingman , hockenheim95 , hot stuff , joguema , MonkeyMan2000 , NoPanic , SoulSurvivor1990 , TooTight
Guests:
1729
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10