Ticket Trader :  Talk
Here you can trade your tickets. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.


Goto Page: PreviousFirst...8182838485...LastNext
Current Page: 83 of 117
Results 2461 - 2490 of 3505
13 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotemarko I would assume that non-paid taxes finally caught them. No, that's defintely not the case. TSP was an official company - remember, we are talking about legal bootlegs here - and of course, they paid all taxes. They even paid mechanical copyrights so Jagger/Richards had some nice extra income from the sales of TSP Stones releases. It came to an end when the international
Forum: Buy/Sell/Trade
13 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotesweetcharmedlife Sounds liek a song that can be played a lot of different ways. Absolutely. Plus, "All Down The Line" is one of the regular standarts in Jaggers pre-show warmup sessions with Chuck, and THAT version - just Jagger vocals and Chuck piano - is ABSOLUTE KILLER.
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotedcba "the TSP guy" do you mean the German one D.S.) or some other individual from Luxembourg? There was only one, and that was "the German one", other individuals from Luxembourg were employees only, handling the sales, but had nothing to do with the production.
Forum: Buy/Sell/Trade
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotemickscarey My INSIDE sources say DONE DEAL I am sure that the real Mick is pretty scared now.
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotedcba "is a special reason why this boot is called "Da Lapa incident"? Did something unusual happened or is it just like this." Iirc Jagger told the crowd "see you after the show at the De Lapa bar"? So the TSP guys pictured 70000 ppl crammed into a tiny place hoping to see MJ. Good and not too far off the mark! Da'Lapa was indeed the hotel where Ja
Forum: Buy/Sell/Trade
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
QuoteThe Joker Disregarding charismatic Keith, and Mick, X-Pensive Winos win against Brothers of Sodom, IMO I am not so sure. I think the Brothers drummer sucks - technically he is good, but he does not swing, he also plays too many stops, breaks and rolls for my taste. But listening to the Brothers club show, the blues numbers in particular, I would say they could really cook on occasion. All
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quoteskipstone It's always been my understanding that the ABKCO Music tracks were recorded for Sticky Fingers. As in, they were already finished, they just held them over for whatever reason. That does not mean that I am right, of course, but that's basically what the publishing says as well as comments from Mick over the years in various magazines. I think your understanding is
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotebassplayer617 The thing that strikes me is that Ronnie and Keith have a natural empathy, as demonstrated here. This is further proof that Ron was the obvious choice to join the Stones in 1975. So true! And it really showed in the music they produced on albums and on stage up until, let's say 1986. After that, Ronnie's role slowly faded, up to a point that on the ABB album, he w
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
It's one of those Stones songs that tends to get overlooked by fans and of course the band themselves, but also one that other bands would have built their careers on.
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Well, they played it live for TV, I think it was "Ready Steady Go". It was posted a while ago in the Hot Stuff forum, and this post finally ended up on the Animal Duds boot by Dog'n'Cat.
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
QuoteDeathgod so does that make Tim Ries the 11th Rolling Stone ? I prefer Ian McLagen over Chuck Chuck seems like a nice guy, but a 'nice guy' don't fit the Stones for me. Look, when the Stones go on tour, we fans think in terms of Rock'n'Roll and attitude, but on tour they are a multi million dollar corporation and they need a safety net, also for insurance re
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
5th Stone, 6th Stone - whatever. During rehearsals Jagger discusses the arrangements with Chuck, and not with Keith or Charlie, not to speak of Ronnie. In fact, if someone is treated like a hired hand it's Ronnie. Chuck is there for a reason. He gets the fire from a lot of fans who believe Keith and Ronnie are not actually dominating the band with their guitar sound anymore just because Chuc
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quoterootsman The 14 tracks recorded for Radio Luxembourg 1964-03-18: (18th March 1964) Bye Bye Johnny / I Wanna Be Your Man / Diddley Daddy / Little By Little / Look What You´ve Done / Mona / Not Fade Away / Now I´ve Got A Witness / PRETTY THING / Walking The Dog / You Better Move On / Reelin´ And Rockin´ / Roll Over Beethoven / Route 66. (Acetate owned by Bill Wyman) Now that's
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
QuoteLightnin' QuoteRingo Oh-kay, so according to Taylor's manager Jeff Allen "there's absolutely no animosity between Mick and the Stones". I hope so, but he doesn't say that they still pay Taylor for those six albums. And if they don't pay him, how can there be no animosity? Good questions. And at last someone who knows how to read between the lines. If
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotegripweed Quoteretired_dog Yes, ok, alright, but where is Lightnin', this board's member supposedly "in the know" about so many things Taylor to ecplain all this? I mean, he mentions contract details and other facts that, if true, only people very close to Taylor could know. How does he explain the public statement of Taylor's management? Lightnin's emal adres
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Yes, ok, alright, but where is Lightnin', this board's member supposedly "in the know" about so many things Taylor to explain all this? I mean, he mentions contract details and other facts that, if true, only people very close to Taylor could know. How does he explain the public statement of Taylor's management? Lightnin's email adress here is "micktaylor@lon
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
"Mick's got a very good relationship with the Stones" OK then, case c-l-o-s-e-d. Lightnin's story about the Stones ripping him off with unpaid royalities since 1982 is obviously total bullshit.
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotenanker's phelge The stones have no reservation paying hubert sumlin's bills or donating to countless charities so at this point wouldn't it stand to reason that they could share something for MT's retirement? The difference is that people like Sumlin admit that they are broke. But whenever stories pop up that Taylor is broke, can't pay his bills and lives in a d
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotevancouver the stereo recordings chess june 11-13 1964,,are in good stereo mix, why listen to these in mono... ???? Just listen to Around And Around or If You Need Me in mono from the singles box set and you know why! They sound much tighter and more powerul than their stereo counterparts. And I say this as a stereo fan in general!
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
QuoteCBII Like I said before, WE don't know what the exact details of this situation really is. The Legal system is the place to find truth since that's where something like this will really be determined. Yes, that's my opinion too. We could discuss this endlessly, but in the end, we don't know the facts or if the facts mentioned here are really true. At court, one can�
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
QuoteLightnin' Quoteretired_dog It's all about internal and external agreements/deals. Record companies usually don't pay the individual artists, they pay to the band as a whole on the grounds of a recording or licensing contract - which are external deals. How the incoming royalities are divided between the individual band members is always fixed in an internal agreement betwee
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
It's all about internal and external agreements/deals. Record companies usually don't pay the individual artists, they pay to the band as a whole on the grounds of a recording or licensing contract - which are external deals. How the incoming royalities are divided between the individual band members is always fixed in an internal agreement between the band members. The internal agre
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quoteopen-g Oh heck, here we go around and round again - this is making me dizzy the 4 w's must be asked. who? when? where? what? any chance on expanding on that, retired_dog? Sorry for not replying sooner, open-g! There's one thing that is making me dizzy: As I understand my source, the whole thing is still an ongoing process which means there are no final decisions yet - s
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
edithgrove666 is no idiot. Something is cookin'. This does not come out of nowhere. However, it is not Charlie's decision if he is out. He just made clear that he does not want any more large scale tours. If they want to do it, he is out. If they scale it down, he is in. Simple as that. In a way, it is in the hands of the other band members if Charlie is in or out. That is what I heard
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
QuoteMathijs It's actually quite amusing to read all these hateful remarks by people who do not have the faintest idea about Klein and his publishing business, or the music business in general. Mathijs Yep, exactly. Klein "stole" the song and recording rights from the Stones? He bought them from Oldham. So did the Stones ever own them? You can't steal from the Stones what t
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotewith sssoul >> I knew this type of archive release would be possible now that the ABKCO and post ABKCO stuff are unified under the same enterprise (Universal) << well ... like i said i'll be keeping the incense lit for these cooperative efforts to go forward smoothly and fruitfully. the fact that ABKCO and the Stones currently share the same distributor doesn't &qu
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotebigmac7895 His name is Chris M. He is a very private man and I don't believe you will receive access to the soundboard. I have often wondered if the "M" stood for Maysles... you know the family that taped this tour! In case he continues releasing small snippets every now and then, it is very well possible that we will be able to put a complete soundboard together in a coup
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
Quotetatters Quotealimente Of course your example would be a travesty, but repairing a vocal is not the same thing. Lets say they want to include Prodigal Son and they have three recordings from three different shows. They would not use the version thats on the Criterion release because there, Keiths guitar is badly out of tune. So there are two versions left. One is an overall lacklustre perform
Forum: Tell Me
14 ***years ***ago
retired_dog
QuoteJumpingKentFlash One question regarding the 60s stuff: Paul McCartney says that his stuff will be coming back to him from Michael Jackson (Dead or not I guess) soon, so he didn't want to re-buy it. He'd get it automatically. Doesn't the same apply for the Stones? Klein had the 60s stuff for many years, but shouldn't it go back to the Stones at some point, or is it a comp
Forum: Tell Me
Goto Page: PreviousFirst...8182838485...LastNext
Current Page: 83 of 117

Previous page Next page First page IORR home