Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.


Goto Page: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 19
Results 1 - 30 of 554
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteJuanTCB QuoteYoungie QuoteJuanTCBBut yeah, the only person that could give Mick a run for his money was Elvis at his prime ('56-'58, '68-'70). How about Little Richard (who Jagger "borrowed" from) and a few rock gods - Plant, Daltry, Morrison, Hendrix and Mercury? Nope. James Brown and Otis are the only other ones that could come close. The guys you mentio
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteJuanTCBBut yeah, the only person that could give Mick a run for his money was Elvis at his prime ('56-'58, '68-'70). How about Little Richard (who Jagger "borrowed" from) and a few rock gods - Plant, Daltry, Morrison, Hendrix and Mercury?
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Before anyone did anything, Elvis did everything
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quote24FPSI'm happy with my Hampton DVD the way it is. Isn't all the LA Forum ('75) material videotape? Don't know but it was rare back then that a concert would be filmed rather than videotaped - because of cost. 99.8% of my concert DVD collection are concerts that have been videotaped...
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoterollingonDo you know if this is playable in Region B (Europe) blu-ray players? Unfortunately no it isn't. I'm from Ireland so am in the same boat as you. Maybe one day we'll get a Euro release of LSTNT...
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quote24FPS What's the big deal on whether something is videotape or film? I much prefer a good videotape image. It's more realistic. Well film is HD (and almost always widescreen) whereas videotape will only ever be SD. Blu Ray is no use for Standard Definition videotaped material.
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuotepietDid they use video screens as early as 82? I was at several shows but I can't remember any screens. But perhaps it is my memory that is failing me. Led Zeppelin used video screens in the mid-late 70's
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quotehockenheim95 Does anybody know if the original tapes from the LSTNT shows still exist? They could release these shows unedited and complete on blu ray Let's Spend the Night Together is out on Blu-Ray (Japan only). I assume the masters were used?
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quotebonddm Anyone know if this gig was shot on film or videotape? Videotape (unlike LSTNT)
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteMunichhiltonLes Paul is over by the bar and he wants to kick your ass... I'm talking British not American...
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuotestoneheartedThe problem with that analogy is that the VU were groundbreaking, in that there was nothing like them before, whereas the Shadows were just another instrumental band whose name we know today primarily because they backed Cliff Richard Incorrect. Hank Marvin influenced all the mid 60's British electric guitarists that followed him (Richards, Clapton, Beck etc) - he was the
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quoteovalvox Brian beat Keith to the punch. And The Kinks beat The Stones "to the punch"..
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quoteab The Shadows were huge in Europe, but almost unknown in the States. The Velvet Underground weren't big in Europe or in the States. Quite the opposite. Does this mean VU influenced no-one? You know the answer.
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteBluzDudeNo, but his back up musicians form a band, regardless if they have a name or not. Cool. And who is talking about Elvis? I'm talking guitarists. Anyway If you want to think that Elvis' band was more well known or influential than the Shadows...that's your problem...
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteBluzDude He played for Elvis? According to you Elvis is a band?
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteBluzDude Who's Hank Marvin? One of the most influential electric guitarist's of all time and in a band which started it all (before the Beatles & Stones)...
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Yawn. He's only known by a few guys LOL. Whereas Eric Clapton & Hank Marvin are known by millions...
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteMel Belli Link Wray, maybe? Too bad no one's heard of him...
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quoterollmops Was Keith the first rock musician to be linked with the term "riff"? Probably Eric Clapton first (or Hank Marvin)
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteGasLightStreet Oh yeah - Keith said he's been thrown off that stage many times. Anyone know how many? I mean, other than the one time? It'd be kinda hard to throw Keith off stage.
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteDoomandGloomguitarist thing, many of us have this angry Montgomery Clift thing going on. My girlfriend now wife got me punched in the face by Dickey Betts for my birthday present long ago, that's why I married her.. Lucky you! Wonder how she managed that? Anyway I guess Chuck Berry didn't want to be "upstaged" by Keef. Chuck Berry was a pretty good guitarist - Ric
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteDoxa The always handy timeisonourside.com offers the following info: June 1981: Keith Richards checks out Chuck Berry perform at The Ritz in New York City. He visits him backstage and gets punched in the eye by Berry, who mistakes him for an eager fan. LOL total BS.
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
QuoteMKjan Is it true Chuck didn't know who it was? Of course Chuck knew it was Keith Richards. The guy was instantly recognizeable.
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
What do the experts here rate the 1970 Euro tour for the Stones? Any comparison to the out-of-this-world 1969 American tour?
Forum: Tell Me
10 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quotestoneman333 Just to say, following Youngie's lead I went back and searched my own DVD collection a bit more carefully, and realised I already have this documentary on a D-Stone double DVD set I got in a trade many years ago. Details are here: The documentary isn't brilliant quality, but seems to be more or less complete at about 27 minutes. It gives the impression of havin
Forum: Buy/Sell/Trade
11 ***years ***ago
Youngie
My guess is the $tones are still horny.
Forum: Tell Me
11 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quotemidimannz Glad I chipped in. I withdraw the previous remark. The blurry has 1080p def AND 480i def depending on your screen 16:9 or 4:3 playback. Thanks for the heads up, its a great pic! Looks better than "Live in Texas '78" Blu-Ray to me. Shame it's not available in Europe
Forum: Tell Me
11 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quotemidimannz I agree with the above, having recently purchased "lets Spend The night together" on Bluray from Japan, sound is better than the DVD - but the quality of the picture is not ??? on the previews the picture looked amazing
Forum: Tell Me
11 ***years ***ago
Youngie
Quotekowalski QuoteYoungie Quotejamesfdouglas He is 100% correct. a 4:3 ratio (can't change that) and video-taped instead of filmed (can't change that either) make a blu-ray release unecessary Not really. One of the main advantages of a Blu Ray release would be the uncompressed/lossless audio. That's the most interesting feature of blu-ray for music videos IMO. Some Girls in
Forum: Tell Me
Goto Page: 12345...LastNext
Current Page: 1 of 19

Previous page Next page First page IORR home